AMPHAR Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 22 hours ago, HoosierCat said: Stadium upgrade deal drops in Jax: Notable given that the Jags are down at the bottom of the revenue and profit lists with the Bengals, yet somehow have a spare $625 million laying around. Nah. He owns Premier League team, wrestling. Shad Khan has sports "investments" as hobbies. More interesting, IMO, is most thought the Jags would be the first team to jump at any London opportunity. Jags are staying for a while with local investment. Also interesting that Jags stadium was originally a highschool stadium then Gator Bowl etc. They tore down everything but a portion of the upper deck prior to Bengals moving into PBS/Paycore. They've done big renovations before that to that stadium to host a Superbowl. Yet, its 1.4billion to renovate again? Paycore is only $400m something. Those Florida/Georgia cocktail party games must really put stress on the stadium. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMPHAR Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 Hamilton County is fucked IF the Bengals leave, period. The half cent sales tax increase would not expire AND neither would the debt service. Somehow the Jags stadium built before PBS/Paycor and also received two major renovations prior to the recent $1.4 B project and that's 3 times more than Paycor projections. The Bengals could be dicks and put themselves out as Free Agents to get the biggest stadium possible and would probably come close to getting it. Their proposal put forward is quite reasonable don't fall for the County propaganda. The time to move on from the Bengals was 1995. County could have hedged their bets and tried to get UC or FC in PBS vs. investing in their own. Didn't happen. Sure anyone on the sidelines can make overtures about what is fair and what isn't. Hamilton county knows Bengals on the riverfront draws a ton of tax dollars to the county. Every other county in the country knows it too. Just save all the political BS and get it done because anyone with common sense knows the Bengals aren't losing this battle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 2 hours ago, AMPHAR said: Hamilton County is fucked IF the Bengals leave, period. The half cent sales tax increase would not expire AND neither would the debt service. Somehow the Jags stadium built before PBS/Paycor and also received two major renovations prior to the recent $1.4 B project and that's 3 times more than Paycor projections. The Bengals could be dicks and put themselves out as Free Agents to get the biggest stadium possible and would probably come close to getting it. Their proposal put forward is quite reasonable don't fall for the County propaganda. The time to move on from the Bengals was 1995. County could have hedged their bets and tried to get UC or FC in PBS vs. investing in their own. Didn't happen. Sure anyone on the sidelines can make overtures about what is fair and what isn't. Hamilton county knows Bengals on the riverfront draws a ton of tax dollars to the county. Every other county in the country knows it too. Just save all the political BS and get it done because anyone with common sense knows the Bengals aren't losing this battle. As much as I rail against public funds being used, I won't argue with the above. It's exactly why the Bengals won't be going anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 Bengals aren’t going anywhere because no other city would build them the stadium amphar thinks they would. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMPHAR Posted June 27 Report Share Posted June 27 1 hour ago, HoosierCat said: Bengals aren’t going anywhere because no other city would build them the stadium amphar thinks they would. Exactly what the thinking was in 1994/95. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 18 Report Share Posted July 18 Just want to pin this one for future reference: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40576732/packers-report-60-million-profit-24-fiscal-year Quote The Packers and the rest of the NFL's 32 teams for the first time received more than $400 million from the league. With the team getting $402.3 million in national revenue, that means the NFL split nearly $13 billion among the teams. Last year (fiscal 2023) was the first time over $12 billion; the year before was the first time over $10 billion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 28 Report Share Posted July 28 Oh for Pete’s sake. Look I get it but unless you can also pass a law to make grass grow in December you will only make things worse. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/i-support-it-new-ohio-bill-would-ban-artificial-turf-on-all-professional-sports-fields/ar-BB1qAh8l Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted July 28 Report Share Posted July 28 Guess they never heard of government overreach. I could be wrong but something tells me there is something more pressing than artificial turf for our elected official to be spending time and money looking into. And they wonder why the average person hates politicians. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted July 28 Report Share Posted July 28 not sure which I hate more, politicians or lawyers I think SoaG tips the scales towards lawyers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted July 28 Report Share Posted July 28 My hatred of Mike Brown has dwindled over the last 5 years. Not because he’s done so many great things, but rather he’s fucking old. I find it hard to get upset with people that are lucky to remember their name. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 2 hours ago, ArmyBengal said: My hatred of Mike Brown has dwindled over the last 5 years. Not because he’s done so many great things, but rather he’s fucking old. I find it hard to get upset with people that are lucky to remember their name. Same. I love having a little fun at his expense, but at the same time there’s just an odd feeling I have. Kind of a combination of pity, empathy, and I’m also a little dumbfounded. Mike is a bit of a marvel to be getting around as well as he does. If you know many 88 year old men you know what I mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 I was fortunate to have all of my grandparents live into their 90’s. We’ve been care givers to my mother in law for 18 years and due to Alzheimer’s is now in a home at 85. It’s both hilarious and sad at the same time. I can’t find a way to bring anger into that scenario. That’s where the soft spot for the elderly comes from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 while I get all that to an extent, someone in such a state should remove themselves from roles like GM of an NFL football team and then they can spout off willy nilly at their leisure without bringing down the team like he does on the daily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 Yeah, my MIL is in her late 80s and last year the family got together and basically moved her at gunpoint from NC up by us in northwest Indiana. Now she has a nice apartment in a senior community and we can get her to doctors and the grocery store without a two day drive first. She is still sharp mentally but it’s getting increasingly hard for her to get around. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 3 hours ago, TJJackson said: while I get all that to an extent, someone in such a state should remove themselves from roles like GM of an NFL football team and then they can spout off willy nilly at their leisure without bringing down the team like he does on the daily He hasn’t done anything “GM” in quite a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 he spoke at the luncheon and did more damage with his "willy nilly" statement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 Eh, Mike just said what we already knew. The Bengals do business their way and don’t much care what the fans, the media or, for that matter, the players, think. In the case of Chase, it’s clear he’s going to get paid, but on their timeline, not his. T’was always thus, in Cincinnati. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 "it always has been this way" does not mean it always has to be this way Hopefully, he dies soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 3 hours ago, HoosierCat said: Eh, Mike just said what we already knew. The Bengals do business their way and don’t much care what the fans, the media or, for that matter, the players, think. In the case of Chase, it’s clear he’s going to get paid, but on their timeline, not his. T’was always thus, in Cincinnati. True. But imagine Chase and his situation. They are costing him very real money by making him play out his deal. Almost every other team would pay him this year. They absolutely can do it. But there is a risk of alienating your player, and be aware your younger players are watching this. “We’re the bengals and this is how we do things,” can be followed by “I’m Jamarr Chase and this is how I do things (fakes a hamstring injury through his franchise tag year then signs with someone else).” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 29 minutes ago, COB said: Almost every other team would pay him this year. Not true. For example, Jefferson’s deal came after his 4th year. That’s pretty standard. Chase is going into year 4 this season. The argument for signing him is that it won’t get any cheaper, but like I said before the Bengals don’t really care about that since it’s not their money. I agree they should do a deal but not doing one wouldn’t be unusual. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted July 29 Report Share Posted July 29 I stand corrected. I was under the impression guys at Chase’s level got extended before they played that 4th year on their rookie deal. I went looking - from Chase’s ‘21 draft class a grand total of one player has had his deal extended, Rashod Bateman from Baltimore. And there are very good to great level players in that class. Devontae Davis, Penei Sewell, Chase, Trevor Larence, Micah Parsons, and Jaylen Waddle. all those guys are playing their 4th year on their price controlled rookie deal. You win again, Mike Brown!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted July 30 Report Share Posted July 30 We’re still waiting on Lamb, and he came a year before Chase. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 30 Report Share Posted July 30 Anyhow, back on stadium-related topics, new locker reveal today. Looks pretty sweet. https://www.bengals.com/photos/new-locker-room#ae5cff84-f71d-4fda-99ce-dda53ebed831 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted August 27 Report Share Posted August 27 Quote The NFL's most exclusive club is about to let in new members. At a special league meeting in Eagan, Minnesota, on Tuesday, the National Football League's 32 owners are expected to vote in favor of allowing select private equity firms to buy up to a 10% stake of a team. Each fund or consortium will be able to do deals with up to six teams. The initial approved firms will include Ares Management, Sixth Street Partners and Arctos Partners, in addition to a consortium nicknamed "The Avengers" that includes Dynasty Equity, Blackstone, Carlyle Group and CVC Capital Partners, people familiar with the matter told CNBC. The firms collectively have $2 trillion in assets and intend to commit $12 billion of capital to be raised (inclusive of leverage) over time, the people said. With at least four investor groups able to invest in up to six teams each, that works out to $500 million of added capital on average for each team that receives an investment. As the NFL opens its doors to new capital, the money will also free up funding for new stadiums and related projects. The Buffalo Bills and Tennessee Titans are both currently in the process of building a new stadium, while the Cleveland Browns, Chicago Bears and Washington Commanders are actively pursuing new stadiums in the future. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/nfl-private-equity-ownership-vote.html It will be interesting to see if Mike is willing to sell a piece of the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted August 27 Report Share Posted August 27 Interesting for sure. Will be interesting to see how that shakes out for the league and Bengals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.