ArmyBengal Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 With their 2nd pick in the 2013 NFL Draft, the Cincinnati Bengals select:Giovani Bernard, RB, North Carolina Quote
HoosierCat Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Woo-hoo, I'm 2 for 2. Who you guys want next? Quote
Stripes Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 I called for Lacy, but I can dig Bernard too. So glad to see RB addressed.DON'T GET INJURED. ALLOW US TO GET OVER THE SPECTRE OF CARTER/PERRY/IRONS. Quote
UK Bengal Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Geno smith he will still be there lol Quote
HoosierCat Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwkk8N9Yd5s Quote
membengal Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Stripes and I seem to be in lockstep this year. Was fine with Lacy, but also very fine with Bernard. Happy to see RB addressed in this round.Thrilled to see the offense getting weapons. With Andre signing apparently done, bengals crossing over to having a good off-season again. Quote
volcom69 Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Bernard is a more overall back the Lacy was! He can also be our new returner! Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Sigh, not a fan of small Rb's with a history of durability concerns in this division. See Bernard Scott - too small for the AFC North, said on the day they drafted him as well, he will get hurt constantly. Draft these little pip squeaks later in the draft. Just my take.That said, hope he becomes the HR/big play threat they really need from the running game, and his receiving skills will help as well obviously.I have NO idea why they bothered to re-sign Scott and Peerman when they obviously had every intention of drafting a RB this high. Makes little sense, but the Bengals' have to be the Bengals. Quote
membengal Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Shula..serious question...isn't Bernard the same basic size that Ray Rice was when he got drafted by the Ravens? I don't see size as the issue here... Quote
TJJackson Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Hair's BPA per statements over on go-bengals forumNot a big fan of tiny running backs (James Brooks excepted), but we'll seeDefinitely a change of pace from Law Firm, which is what they wanted. Quote
GWS Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 When he runs his feet run a mile a minute but he is not covering much ground...lol. If you take a small back he better be quick as hell and/or elusive like Barry Sanders or blazing fast. He is neither. Could have got him in round 4. He will be caught from behind often. This team cant grade linebackers or RB's. Quote
membengal Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Could have got him in round 4? Enjoy being high. Quote
Stripes Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Could have got him in round 4.:crack:/> Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Shula..serious question...isn't Bernard the same basic size that Ray Rice was when he got drafted by the Ravens? I don't see size as the issue here...I think the difference is that Rice is obviously stockier/built better (he's almost 10 pounds heavier yet 2 inches shorter than Bernard) and has never had the durability concerns Bernard has (Giovanni). Maybe Bernard puts some weight/muscle on hopefully (Bernard Scott sure hasn't).I'm not saying it's a "bad" pick, would've just preferred a S or G or C or LB, and his size/durability concerns are an issue.I also think the Ravens' o-line is superior to the Bengals as run blockers across the board. Quote
HaydenM Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Great pick. Big play guy who can totally change a game with one run, catch, or return.I'm thinking people who criticize him just didn't watch many UNC games. At he end if the year he was considered the top back in the county. Quote
TJJackson Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 somewhat related aside: With all these highly drafted/rated UNC players, I am starting to wonder how they lost 4 games last year Quote
101Airborne Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Now if they just grab a S or LB with their second pick, I'll be a happy guy! As for grabbing him in round 4... I highly doubt that given that no one selected an RB in round 1. Quote
HoosierCat Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 walter's insta-grade:37. Giovani Bernard, RB, North Carolina: B- Grade We heard that the Bengals were going "all in" on Eddie Lacy, but Giovani Bernard makes more sense as a complement for BenJarvus Green-Ellis. Bernard is a speed back with return ability, which is exactly what Cincinnati needed. This is a slight reach - Bernard probably would have been around for Cincinnati's second-rounder - but he's a very good fit. Oh yeah, right, hey Peter King, how's that "Bengals are all in on Lacy" thing workin' for ya? :lmao:/> Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Great pick. Big play guy who can totally change a game with one run, catch, or return.I'm thinking people who criticize him just didn't watch many UNC games. At he end if the year he was considered the top back in the county.I don't think anyone's criticizing "him," the Bengals' got arguably the best RB in the draft, but, it wasn't a "huge" need (IMO) and was a bit of a reach at that spot.Eh, hoping for the best with him, there's no doubt they need a 50/50 compliment to BJGE. Quote
membengal Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 oof, shula, RB sure felt like a need to me, at any rate. Glad they addressed it in the draft (since they didn't go after Bush in the free agency period) Quote
101Airborne Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 Great pick. Big play guy who can totally change a game with one run, catch, or return.I'm thinking people who criticize him just didn't watch many UNC games. At he end if the year he was considered the top back in the county.I don't think anyone's criticizing "him," the Bengals' got arguably the best RB in the draft, but, it wasn't a "huge" need (IMO) and was a bit of a reach at that spot.Eh, hoping for the best with him, there's no doubt they need a 50/50 compliment to BJGE.I'm curious, with our O struggling so much last year, what would you have considered a bigger need, OT perhaps? I know we have needs at S and LB but our defense played really well. With our run game being pretty weak, why do you consider this area not to be a huge need? Quote
TJJackson Posted April 26, 2013 Report Posted April 26, 2013 wasn't a "huge" need (IMO) and was a bit of a reach at that spot.Eh, hoping for the best with him, there's no doubt they need a 50/50 compliment to BJGE.I think most - myself certainly included - would disagree with you on RB not being a needI think one has to factor need and system into BPA, and this fellow was such a good fit that it isn't too much of a reach Quote
COB Posted April 27, 2013 Report Posted April 27, 2013 I bought my wife a Giovanni Bernard handbag at Saks for our 17th anniversary. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.