-
Posts
29,819 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
679
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by ArmyBengal
-
It might get ugly, but I'm all in with Burrow throwing his weight around. If he's the guy that is tasked with the team's success, he should have at least a small say in how this plays out. If he's for real about restructuring his contract to make that happen, I think that's huge and speaks volumes. I'm still of the mindset that Chase and Trey get extended but Tee is the odd man out. While I want Tee to stay and think they can manage it, I get why they wouldn't. I just wish they would do something along the lines of tag and trade. Getting a comp 3rd in return for Tee walking is straight ass. He's simply worth more.
-
Too bad there wasn’t a way to sell off a small portion of the ownership. Let’s make up a number and say 10% which would give that part owner absolutely no say whatsoever in running the team. Knowing the Bengals they would probably vote against something that would net them around $300 million dollars. Maybe the league should consider that…
-
I'm good with that tax, as I don't bet and hearing about all the betting options during a game is irritating. That and it sure as hell beats someone suggesting my property taxes should be raised or only Hamilton county residents shouldering the whole load for funding from a tax payer stand point. Go get'em DeWine.
-
I would drop a large dollar bet that T-Mac doesn't make it out of the top 10 and maybe top 5. #17 ?? Not a prayer. However, should that miracle take place, I would hope the Bengals ran to the podium even though a 1st round WR doesn't excite me. You simply can't pass up that kind of talent.
-
Typically I will end up taking both a DT and a DE within the first four picks when doing mock drafts. It's a need and it happens to fall that way more often then not. OG, S, LB, WR, RB and CB get sprinkled in as well.
-
And I see the Bengals named as one of two teams he may end up with. I will admit the idea of adding a motivated Kupp would not be bad, it would have to be at a greatly reduced price. He’s going to turn 32 this summer and had some injury concerns recently. If they let Tee walk, which I’m still expecting, adding Kupp and another WR in the draft could bear fruit. Just get some pass rushers and some o-line help (again) to go along with him.
-
Again, results aren't the lone factor in making this determination. It's a maybe if they are or are not efficient, as I noted in a previous comment. Now, my personal opinion is that if you don't win the Super Bowl it's a failure of a season. I hate the Steelers and they haven't won a Super Bowl in nearly 20 years. However, I don't view their front office as archaic in the least. What about the Ravens? They haven't won the Super Bowl since 2013. Same. To put your percentage in another light 66% of the teams in the league HAVE won a Super Bowl. Picking and choosing timeframes is irrelevant. But if it's also helpful, since 2003 the Bengals have won the Super Bowl 0%. The front office and team have done nothing but fail. Unfortunately part of being a Bengals fan is that coming close is viewed as a success. Even in the best catching lightning in a bottle scenario for us, we have failed.
-
Just like Lou before him, Golden runs a 4-3 base and a 4-2 nickel known for bringing pressure. The were top 5 in turnovers nationally last year at Notre Dame. I would assume the NT will be utilized in the same manner that we have become accustomed to. That being said, if they go DT at any point in the draft (which they should) I don't want a space eater. I want a guy with some pass rush ability capable of bringing pressure up the gut. Hoping the snaps for both Jenkins and Jackson this season help them with progressing into year 2.
-
So for you, success on the field = an efficient, not archaic, front office. I get that. I simply disagree. No issue. In 57 seasons, the Bengals have gone to the playoffs 16 times and hold a 10-16 post season record. They are 3-8 in the wild card round, 4-4 in the divisional round and 3-1 in the conference championship. As we all know well and good, they are 0-3 in Super Bowl appearances. I just don't view getting to the playoffs as a success when winning the Super Bowl is the goal and certainly don't look at that equating to front office efficiency.
-
You are equating their record on the field with being an efficient business. Neither of those things necessarily prove the other. If you are super efficient, you may not win shit. If you do win, it might not be because you were efficient. How many times has it been said the Bengals success is like catching lightning in a bottle? I've always been of the mindset that I'm waiting for that to happen again, rather than thinking the efficiency of this front office is what is going to carry us to a Super Bowl victory. The thought of that being true seems quite laughable to me based on our history.
-
If Hartline isn't the best WR coach in all of college football, I don't know who is. Even if given a name to challenge that, I would disagree. He's that good. I believe he stepped into that role for a short time a few years back, but went back to the WR role. I would have no issue with him getting the gig because that would keep him at OSU. However, sometimes you find people that simply have a gift for what they do. Hartline is a gifted WR coach. He made a little over $1.5m last year, so I think he's ok. I have long said that not all money is good money.
-
Because the score board is only one piece. If they are an effective NFL business because they win, then the question must be asked, how did that happen? Is it the way they conduct their business that produces the wins and in turn they are effective? Or is it because they have a generational talent at the QB position with other pieces? It's like using stats alone to determine how good a player is. Again, I can and do give credit to the front office for getting deals done, but that alone does not make it the most efficient and effect way to run your business. I defer to COB's comments from earlier as opposed to simply rewriting them.
-
I get you COB, hate to see some of those coaches leaving. It happens though. It was reported that J. Smith was offered over $4m in NIL money to leave and he refused. Your point about OSU producing NFL caliber WR's is spot on. There is a reason for that and really one of the few coaches I would have heartache seeing leave. Brian Hartline Dude doesn't not get enough credit for not only his recruiting ability, but being able to get these young kids ready to play in the league. His resume speaks volumes and one would be hard pressed to find another coach that has had the type of impact he has had, on their own team. Do whatever needs to be done OSU, but do NOT let that dude leave the building.
-
Regarding offseason notes: I really hope Burrow is keeping track of these guys recently taking shots at him saying he’s not an elite QB.
-
Wait one... "Complete" fault ?? No, of course not. There's certainly understanding the player and/or their agent play a role in these deals. My take is that the front office rarely seems to make these things a priority unless they are a QB. The other guys that have gotten paid seem to be when they bring in free agents. When they are due for an extension, it seems to fall apart.