Jump to content

Crazy Talk: Should the Bengals Tag Nelson?


HoosierCat

  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Franchise Reggie Nelson?

    • Yea
      2
    • Nay
      10


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No word on $$$ yet. Reedy says things will be finalized tomorrow. But he is hearing it's a 4-year deal, which would make Reggie one of just 4 guys under contract through 2015 (Cook, Whit and Hall are the others). Sounds like they were either way more interested in keeping Nelson than they let on...or Zimmer threatened to go nuclear on Mike Brown if he didn't bring some of his players back! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I see Nelson also being aided by having OTA's and camp with the coaches and seeing what adding some help at the CB will do for him. Again, I don't think he's the greatest safety in the world, but I think he does well with what Zimmer wants from him and think he will do better this year. If nothing else, he will give the youngsters some more time to develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not far apart on that view, Army, in fact, I think we view him similarly. We differed on how to handle his pending free agency. Regardless, I am glad he is back and pleased with the continuity and the fact that I think he can still improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest Mem, the only reason I was in favor of tagging him was due to the lower cost for the safety tag in comparison to other positions and the fact we had the money to take care of that spot for at least another season, while waiting to upgrade. Had they not had that kind of money, I would not have been of the same thought process. Either way, i'm happy there is at least some continuity as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that actually speaks volumes as to what the FO really thinks of him.

They could have tagged him at that price and found his replacement heading into next season.

Now they paid him that price AND kept him around for a while longer.

Less than 4 mil per seasons from there on isn't bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a very good deal -- for Reggie. It isn't bad for the Bengals, either; the $4.5 million average is completely manageable, but I think it can be argued that they paid a premium (read: overpaid) for him.

Consider: barring a better long-term deal with one of the 3 franchised safeties, Reggie will be the highest-paid safety of this FA period. His $6.5 million this season puts him ahead of those franchised guys, and means that he'll be making top-5 safety money in 2012.

The more I think about it, the more impressed I am with the Bengals for doing this deal.

I am also enjoying the groans Brown must have caused in SF, Oakland and Tennessee, where 3 franchise safeties now have a base from which to negotiate from. For once, Mike has actually topped the FA market at a position. Props.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...