AMPHAR Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago I also can't wait until preseason game 1 where he dominates a future UPS driver at tackle. Myles Murphy has struggled to even look productive in the preseason. But those were good times when Margus Hunt would throw a tackle for 5 yards like a shot put. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago 22 minutes ago, AMPHAR said: He's productive just not in the sack category. He wasn't productive in many of the categories that get most of the talk. Sacks? No. Tackles? Not really. TFL? 13. Forced Fumbles? Just 1. INT's? None. However, as I mentioned previously he led the nation in a little known stat "seconds to pressure" at 2.43 seconds. Admittedly, that's REALLY fast from snap to making the QB feel your presence. Leading his team in pressures is also noteworthy. I don't know what they will get from him at this point, but won't complain about a guy that can bring that pressure. Pressuring the QB makes things easier on the rest of the defense. D-line, linebackers, secondary, everyone. Yes please, give me that. Hubbard was loved and averaged 5.5 sacks per season over his 7 seasons with the Bengals. Dare I say that between Murphy and Stewart, they should be able to get that? Color me confident... Quote
AMPHAR Posted 12 hours ago Report Posted 12 hours ago He was productive when using Aggie DL as a comparison. The DL leader in tackles was 40. The DL sack leader was 5. He had 31 and 1.5. The defense wasn't geared for the DL to produce stats, I guess. Quote
TJJackson Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago S U X (and mind you, I LIKE drafting linemen) Quote
HoosierCat Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago I gotta say, between the clips of him at the draft last night, then today at the stadium and with the media, I couldn’t help but instantly like the kid. He’s almost painfully earnest, and all his answers to questions seem good without being football-speak. He’s clearly jazzed about the whole situation. Whether he ever amounts to anything, we’ll see, but I’m rooting for him. Quote
TJJackson Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago 57 minutes ago, HoosierCat said: I gotta say, between the clips of him at the draft last night, then today at the stadium and with the media, I couldn’t help but instantly like the kid. He’s almost painfully earnest, and all his answers to questions seem good without being football-speak. He’s clearly jazzed about the whole situation. Whether he ever amounts to anything, we’ll see, but I’m rooting for him. all of this, I agree with but it doesnt get us to SUPERBOWL I mean, I want him to do well, I hope he is the second coming of Lawrence Taylor......but all I see is another Vernon Gholston right now Quote
Stripes Posted 10 hours ago Report Posted 10 hours ago I expect nothing, but I’ll be happy to be proven wrong. I resist the tendency to talk myself into things if it feels like coping. Regardless, they have a plan and a vision, so we’ll see what happens. No point in screaming yet. I’ll let him play. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted 9 hours ago Author Report Posted 9 hours ago I have tried in recent years not to talk myself into agreeing for the sake of agreeing as well. Thats not the case here and have said I don’t dislike less than anyone here I think. If the only way you view the kid is by sacks, that’s a disservice. I’m not leading the charge to put him in the Hall of Fame mine you, just acknowledging we addressed a need with a high motor, high character kid with outstanding athletic ability. It’s not like some of the other character concerns and small school concerns you have with some of the others. Quote
TJJackson Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago at the end of the day, Army, we want to win football games I dont see this guy helping us do that There were a lot of other guys available at that pick that I think WOULD have helped us Lets hope he proves me wrong Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.