Earendil Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 John Connor is solid muscle. He's like a meat brick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 I think they'll scout the waiver wire for a better 5th cb, and i think they bring Shaffer back when they put Hawkins on Recallable IR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 OFFENSE11 Dane Sanzenbacher, *16 Andrew Hawkins, 19 Brandon Tate,Offensive line (9): 77 Andrew Whitworth (T), 65 Clint Boling (G), 64 Kyle Cook ©, 68 Kevin Zeitler (G), 71 Andre Smith (T), 73 Anthony Collins (T), 66 Trevor Robinson (C/G), 67 Mike Pollak (G), 72 Tanner Hawkinson (T/G)Rollands Gone,Yesssssssssssssssssssssss! :P/> would make me happy.DEFENSEDefensive line (9): 94 Domata Peko (DT), 97 Geno Atkins (DT), 96 Carlos Dunlap (DE), 93 Michael Johnson (DE), 95 Wallace Gilberry (DE), 91 Robert Geathers (DE), 75 Devon Still (DT), 98 Brandon Thompson (DT), 99 Margus Hunt (DE)Damn we do gotta go 9 Linemen no one we can cut,Here i was hoping moch would make it.Really not surprised since only positions really up for grab are like last spot at RB,Last spot at LB I would prefer keep charles over Alex Smith though.Even if we keep connors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 OFFENSE11 Dane Sanzenbacher, *16 Andrew Hawkins, 19 Brandon Tate,Offensive line (9): 77 Andrew Whitworth (T), 65 Clint Boling (G), 64 Kyle Cook ©, 68 Kevin Zeitler (G), 71 Andre Smith (T), 73 Anthony Collins (T), 66 Trevor Robinson (C/G), 67 Mike Pollak (G), 72 Tanner Hawkinson (T/G)Rollands Gone,Yesssssssssssssssssssssss! :P/>/> would make me happy.But the guy replacing him was only able to do 11 reps at the combine - less than many wrs, safeties, and cornersI too would prefer to keep Orson over Alex as TE3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 Dan Coats was going to re-institute the H-back position and that never happened. Andy will not have all day to check down three or four deep so I don't see Charles getting many receptions.Problem was Coats was never a secret weapon,unless ment when he helped the other teams by being frakin terrible.I think they'll scout the waiver wire for a better 5th cb, and i think they bring Shaffer back when they put Hawkins on Recallable IR 5th cb or 6th? ghee I thought played fine this offseason but again staying healthy is the hard part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 Quinn caught on with the Cards./>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/08/27/cardinals-sign-richard-quinn-cut-two-others/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Ray Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 Yeah, it's kind of a raw deal for Charles but I'm leaning toward Connor as well. I don't doubt that someone will scoop Orson off waivers, tho, so he'll get another chance. I just hope it isn't in the division.I sure hope they explore trading Charles before they cut him. There are a lot of teams looking for TE and you don't have to look further than our own division Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted August 27, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 In regards to the Charles as an H-Back option. I still think that's trying to get to smart for your own good.I don't see a team in the AFCN, who wants to establish the run, giving up the only true FB they have left on the roster.Not only that, a VERY good FB that absolutely demolishes rushers, stoning them cold.Seriously, go back and watch those games (if you have them on DVR). Connor is brutal.Again, no need to outthink yourself on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 In regards to the Charles as an H-Back option. I still think that's trying to get to smart for your own good.I don't see a team in the AFCN, who wants to establish the run, giving up the only true FB they have left on the roster.Not only that, a VERY good FB that absolutely demolishes rushers, stoning them cold.Seriously, go back and watch those games (if you have them on DVR). Connor is brutal.Again, no need to outthink yourself on this one.Thats why I would make Charles 3rd TE/2nd FB also,Gresham has been a fine blocker eifert is looking good well blocking no point carrying a blocking only TE in alex smith IMO and If Eifert or Gresham go down you have someone with closer skillset to them in charles then you do smith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Ray Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 In regards to the Charles as an H-Back option. I still think that's trying to get to smart for your own good.I don't see a team in the AFCN, who wants to establish the run, giving up the only true FB they have left on the roster.Not only that, a VERY good FB that absolutely demolishes rushers, stoning them cold.Seriously, go back and watch those games (if you have them on DVR). Connor is brutal.Again, no need to outthink yourself on this one.Thats why I would make Charles 3rd TE/2nd FB also,Gresham has been a fine blocker eifert is looking good well blocking no point carrying a blocking only TE in alex smith IMO and If Eifert or Gresham go down you have someone with closer skillset to them in charles then you do smith.I don't know if the coaches agree with me but the way I see it is that this does not come down to Charles vs Conner. It's Charles vs Alex Smith. Is Smith really that much superior as a blocker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted August 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2013 However they see it, I see it as:Connor over Charles for the FB spotCharles over Smith for the 3rd TE spotCharles as the 3rd TE while keeping Connor just seems to make good sense to me.You keep your true hardnosed FB and get a 3rd TE that can fill in for Gresham and Eifert as well as run plays from that H-back thought process.I really won't understand keeping Smith and Charles being let go.If that is the case, I agree with the thought of trying to trade him before just letting him go to the Ravens or Steelers.That would just piss me off. Smith ?? Not so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted August 28, 2013 Report Share Posted August 28, 2013 I don't get the Alex Smith love they seem to have. If they're worried about experience they have Gresham and Charles isn't exactly a noob.If things shake out like Reedy thinks I could see Charles coming back after they IR/recall Hawk, but that assumes he doesn't get claimed, and I think he will.Hobs was on Lance the other night and said that ASmith is a lot like Reggie Kelly was. He is a veteran-father figure type that the younger guys look up to. Maybe that's what they value more than just football skills, especially with such a young team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted August 28, 2013 Report Share Posted August 28, 2013 I don't get the Alex Smith love they seem to have. If they're worried about experience they have Gresham and Charles isn't exactly a noob.If things shake out like Reedy thinks I could see Charles coming back after they IR/recall Hawk, but that assumes he doesn't get claimed, and I think he will.Hobs was on Lance the other night and said that ASmith is a lot like Reggie Kelly was. He is a veteran-father figure type that the younger guys look up to. Maybe that's what they value more than just football skills, especially with such a young team.I dont care if he cured Mother Theresa's herpes, I want the upside potential of Charles over the known below average TE that Smith is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted August 30, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 To bring the conversation of Connor vs. Charles back up, did you all see the block Connor threw to seal Gio's TD run from a yard out ??That is exactly the reason I want to see Connor make this team. He's a traditional FB who likes to hand out big blocks.Those blocks will help the running game GREATLY.I still want Charles as the 3rd TE though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 To bring the conversation of Connor vs. Charles back up, did you all see the block Connor threw to seal Gio's TD run from a yard out ??That is exactly the reason I want to see Connor make this team. He's a traditional FB who likes to hand out big blocks.Those blocks will help the running game GREATLY.I still want Charles as the 3rd TE though.agreed army Connor is perfect for the running game when comes to Smash Mouth football that Marv and Co wanna do in AFCN,Where Charles I see only really playing FB in a no huddle package...I don't mind Smith but with how coach's praise Greshams and eiferts blocking I don't see the need for him.Hobs was on Lance the other night and said that ASmith is a lot like Reggie Kelly was. He is a veteran-father figure type that the younger guys look up to. Maybe that's what they value more than just football skills, especially with such a young team.It's a good thing we have Whitworth who is like father figure,I thought we moved passed the days of our crappyness where we stopped keeping niceguys who could no longer play and With Smith not catching single pass in preseason all he is is glorified 6th linemen and thats why we have Rollands.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 I think we can scratch DeQuin Evans. NFL just announced he is suspended 8 games for PEDs. Second offense, first suspension was in 2011.Too bad. I was rooting for him ever since I first heard his backstory. Sad ending today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 I think we can scratch DeQuin Evans. NFL just announced he is suspended 8 games for PEDs. Second offense, first suspension was in 2011.Too bad. I was rooting for him ever since I first heard his backstory. Sad ending today.What a shame. Seemed like he had his head on straight... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 Per LaCanfora, Lamur is done for the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 Per LaCanfora, Lamur is done for the season. :(/>Yep and I'm officially bummed out! Rey M probably going to play Nickle again with Burfict. Well I guess TE and RB will be able to catch anything they want. I'm really upset about this, one of the worst guys we could have lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 Per LaCanfora, Lamur is done for the season. />Yep and I'm officially bummed out! Rey M probably going to play Nickle again with Burfict. Well I guess TE and RB will be able to catch anything they want. I'm really upset about this, one of the worst guys we could have lost.I'm bummed too, but one of the worst guys we could have lost? Hardly.I still say we've been quite lucky with injuries this offseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 Per LaCanfora, Lamur is done for the season. />Yep and I'm officially bummed out! Rey M probably going to play Nickle again with Burfict. Well I guess TE and RB will be able to catch anything they want. I'm really upset about this, one of the worst guys we could have lost.I'm bummed too, but one of the worst guys we could have lost? Hardly.I still say we've been quite lucky with injuries this offseason.At the LB position I think so. Lamur was the fastest and best guy in coverage that they had. I'm sorry I don't see another guy on this team right now, who could play Nickle LB like Lamur could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 I think we can scratch DeQuin Evans. NFL just announced he is suspended 8 games for PEDs. Second offense, first suspension was in 2011.I read elsewhere that this is (ironically) actually a kinda good thing, as1) a suspended player does not count against the 532) so the bengals can leave him on the roster and make a decision after 8 weeks - if they need a DE/LB at that point, they have him under contractso now they dont have to expose the guy to waivers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 At the LB position I think so. Lamur was the fastest and best guy in coverage that they had. I'm sorry I don't see another guy on this team right now, who could play Nickle LB like Lamur could.I get your point - I like Lamur too - but who would you rather lose for the season - Lamur or Burfict?fwiw, I'd rather have Burfict if I had to choose one to stay and one to be goneRegardless of your answer, yes, this is a big blow to the defense but not as big as losing Geno, for example Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted August 30, 2013 Report Share Posted August 30, 2013 At the LB position I think so. Lamur was the fastest and best guy in coverage that they had. I'm sorry I don't see another guy on this team right now, who could play Nickle LB like Lamur could.I get your point - I like Lamur too - but who would you rather lose for the season - Lamur or Burfict?fwiw, I'd rather have Burfict if I had to choose one to stay and one to be goneRegardless of your answer, yes, this is a big blow to the defense but not as big as losing Geno, for exampleI get that, but when it comes to Nickle defense which the bengals play more of that then anything, Lamur was the best cover LB we had. Once again TE and RB will be running free uncovered. What other LB on this team is going to cover, I really don't see one at this point. I just don't want to see Rey out there as a 3 down LB on Nickle downs.So yes he is not the worst guy to lose, but as the main Nickle LB I think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted August 31, 2013 Report Share Posted August 31, 2013 Connor and JK Shafer out, per reports on twitter from Hobs and Reedy.Not a fan of Charles over Connor. If you're going to carry a fullback, carry a real fullback. This combo crap didn't work with Coats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.