jjakq27 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 http://cincinnati.com/blogs/bengals/2010/07/02/rostertology-an-early-depth-chart/OFFENSE QB: Carson Palmer, J.T. O’Sullivan, Jordan PalmerRB: Cedric Benson, Bernard Scott, Brian Leonard, Cedric Peerman, Cordera EasonFB: Fui Vakapuna, Joe TronzoWR: Chad Ochocinco, Jerome Simpson, Dezmon Briscoe, Freddie BrownWR: Antonio Bryant, Andre Caldwell/Jordan Shipley, Quan Cosby, Matt Jones, Maurice PurifyC: Kyle Cook, Jonathan Luigs, Dan Santucci/Reggie StephensLT: Andrew Whitworth, Anthony CollinsRT: Dennis Roland, Andre SmithLG: Nate Livings, Evan MathisRG: Bobbie Williams, Otis HudsonLineman also in mix: Gabriel Manns (OT), Andrew Mitchell (OT), Isaac Sowells (G/OT); Reserved/injured list or PUP list: Jason Shirley (G)TE: Jermaine Gresham, Reggie Kelly, Chase Coffman, Daniel Coats/Darius Hill DEFENSELE: Robert Geathers, Frostee Rucker/Carlos DunlapRE: Antwan Odom, Jonathan FaneneLDT: Tank Johnson, Pat SimsRDT: Domata Peko, Orien Harris/Geno AtkinsOther lineman in mix: Clinton McDonald (DT), Rahim Alem (DE)SLB: Rey Maualuga, Michael Johnson, Rashad Jeanty/Dan SkutaMLB: Dhani Jones, Abdul Hodge, Roddrick MuckelroyWLB: Keith Rivers, Brandon Johnson, Vincent ReyRCB: Leon Hall, Morgan Trent/Adam Jones,LCB: Johnathan Joseph, David Jones, Brandon GheeSS: Roy Williams, Chinedum Ndukwe, Kyries HebertFS: Chris Crocker, Gibril Wilson, Tom Nelson, Rico MurrayOthers in secondary in the mix: Johnny Sears (CB), Jeromy Miles (S) SPECIALISTS P: Kevin HuberPK: Mike Nugent/Dave RaynerKR: Bernard Scott, Andre Caldwell/Adam JonesPR: Quan Cosby/Jordan Shipley/Adam Jones/Tom NelsonLS: Clark Harris, Mike Windt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Whatthehell? How did I miss the Joe Tronzo signing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Whatthehell? How did I miss the Joe Tronzo signing?Nothing could pull your attention away from the excitement and subsequent analysis of the Mike Windt signing, and Tronzo probably flew in right under your radar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 so someone needs to start a Joe Tronzo thread to capture all this excitementuh, not me though :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Whatthehell? How did I miss the Joe Tronzo signing?Nothing could pull your attention away from the excitement and subsequent analysis of the Mike Windt signing, and Tronzo probably flew in right under your radar. I'm telling ya', I've got egg on my face over this one. But I comfort myself by noting how cool the guys name is. Sorta like a character out of a Hap and Leonard novel. That said, I doubt very much that Tronzo is actually seen as the 2nd string FB....a role more likely to be filled by Brian Leonard if and when the need arises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 2nd string FB....a role more likely to be filled by Brian Leonard Daniel Coats if and when the need arises.hehe*TJ runs and hides as Bengals fan everywhere hurl shoes, eggs, anvils - whatever they can get their hands on - at him for bringing up "Hands-Of-Stone" Coats* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Only parts I feel uncomfortable with is the Oline...But when Smith is healthy and Replaces Roland and Manthis is the Starter I won't mind it.# LE: Robert Geathers, Frostee Rucker/Carlos Dunlap# RE: Antwan Odom, Jonathan Fanene# LDT: Tank Johnson, Pat Sims# RDT: Domata Peko, Orien Harris/Geno Atkins# Other lineman in mix: Clinton McDonald (DT), Rahim Alem (DE)# SLB: Rey Maualuga, Michael Johnson, Rashad Jeanty/Dan SkutaI find it interesting not only is MJ not listed as a end but he jumped Jeanty on the depth chart (sure he is injured but so is Rey)hehe*TJ runs and hides as Bengals fan everywhere hurl shoes, eggs, anvils - whatever they can get their hands on - at him for bringing up "Hands-Of-Stone" Coats* I'd say it doesn't matter because he's a dead man walking and won't make the team...But I won't because I said it last year and our top 2 Tight Ends were injured >_<PS,I'm also Glad Gresham is getting first team Reps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clackwoods Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Gresham better get first team reps. He just has to be alive to be better than our TEs last season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Only parts I feel uncomfortable with is the Oline...But when Smith is healthy and Replaces Roland and Mathis is the Starter I won't mind it.I agree. At nearly every position on this team, not only do I like the starters, but I'm incredibly happy with the depth and competition. But it's a very different story with the O-Line, isn't it? There are several question marks with the starters... and even less to like with the depth. Whitworth is very solid, and I'm happy with Collins as his back-up, but that's pretty much the only place on the O-Line I feel good about.I don't trust Cook. He was simply not very good last year. There is also no one behind him on the depth chart that has proven anything.Bobbie's best days are behind him. He's solid in run blocking - but he was guilty of a lot of penalties last year and was a sub-par pass blocker.I see Livings as decent depth at both OG positions, but not a quality starter. Why isn't Mathis ahead of him?Roland is a huge liability as a pass blocker. Enough said.If Cook improves, Mathis leapfrogs Livings, and Andre Smith gets healthy, I'll feel a whole lot better... but those are 3 "ifs" right off the bat. The O-Line makes me nervous. Looking over the entire roster, my main fear with this team is that we'll continue to see poor pass protection. If that happens, even with new weapons and an improved playbook, they will still feature a very one dimensional offense. That's not all bad (I enjoyed it thoroughly last year), but I think without a real threat of a passing game, this team has a relatively low ceiling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Looking over the entire roster, my main fear with this team is that we'll continue to see poor pass protection. If that happens, even with new weapons and an improved playbook, they will still feature a very one dimensional offense. That's not all bad (I enjoyed it thoroughly last year), but I think without a real threat of a passing game, this team has a relatively low ceiling.Here's the thing. If the pass protections breaks down on a play, the best out for a QB (outside of throwing it out of bounds) is to dump it off to the RB, but since Benson is not much of a receiving threat, I look for Gresham to simply break off his block, turn around and I'm sure Carson will dump it to him for a few yards. Again, a RB with good hands (Westbrook?) would come in handy, especially if Ced is suspended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Looking over the entire roster, my main fear with this team is that we'll continue to see poor pass protection. If that happens, even with new weapons and an improved playbook, they will still feature a very one dimensional offense. That's not all bad (I enjoyed it thoroughly last year), but I think without a real threat of a passing game, this team has a relatively low ceiling.Here's the thing. If the pass protections breaks down on a play, the best out for a QB (outside of throwing it out of bounds) is to dump it off to the RB, but since Benson is not much of a receiving threat, I look for Gresham to simply break off his block, turn around and I'm sure Carson will dump it to him for a few yards. Again, a RB with good hands (Westbrook?) would come in handy, especially if Ced is suspended.WE have 2 RB's that fit that role, Leonard and Scott have both shown very good receiving skills. There is no place on this team for a washed up Westbrook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 I see Livings as decent depth at both OG positions, but not a quality starter. Why isn't Mathis ahead of him?Still Recovering from my understand...Or Alexander feels good about him self having 3 udfa start even though he has better options :| Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 I'm fine with the o-line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted July 4, 2010 Report Share Posted July 4, 2010 I'm fine with the o-line.Still worried.This is a huge positive move for the Bengals, but you can't help thinking that but for some strange coaching decisions it could have been even better. With Evan Mathis installed as the full-time starting LG the Bengals won six of seven games and he played as well as anyone. Which is a Concern I had all last season,Going by their Ratings Manthis(14.1)7th vs Livings 52nd(-3.7?) out of guards you could tell there was a drop off in play when livings wasn't in.IMO he was very underrated and had some very key blocks in alot of Ceds big runs.Biggest Concern: Can the coaches just settle on the best five guys they have and stop trying to over-think the whole thing?I hope so...I'm sick of seeing unbalanced Oline more then 1-2 plays a game,I'm tired of seeing position coach call players like Stacey Andrew the best Otackle in league...I know he was just resigned for 3 more years but I hope when Marvin Extends he fires Alexander and then he can make Dawson the Oline coach. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted July 4, 2010 Report Share Posted July 4, 2010 The coaching staff really needs to drill the O-line this camp and take care of the penalty problem. With just 1/3 less O-line penalties many stalled drives end up in points last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesperateDerelict Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 I think 'zone members and coaches are over-rating our depth, For the 1st time in forever, we have five preseason games. Even if you assume that the HOF game against Dallas will be no more strenuous than the mock / intrasquad contests in training camp, i believe we need as much camp fodder as we can get.The following will see little or no play the last 3 quarters of the HOF game (Dal), the last 2 quarters plus in preseason games 2 & 3 (DEN & PHI), the 4th quarter of game 4 (at Buf), and maybe one series at Ind in game 5:OFFENSEQB: Carson PalmerRB: Cedric BensonFB: WR: Chad OchocincoWR: Antonio Bryant? C: ?LT: Andrew Whitworth RT: Andre SmithLG: Jason Shirley RG: Bobbie WilliamsTE: Reggie KellyDEFENSELE: Robert Geathers RE: Antwan Odom LDT: Tank Johnson RDT: Domata Peko SLB: Rey Maualuga MLB: Dhani Jones WLB: Keith Rivers RCB: Leon Hall LCB: Johnathan Joseph SS: Roy Williams FS: Chris CrockerWith a couple of holdouts, suspensiona, and / or injuries at the same position, we can get pretty thin - then they'd need to ask 1 or 2 subs to play 13 - 14 preseason quarters, or expose a starting veteran.My biggest concerns would be at DT, OT, SS, and especially RB. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted July 5, 2010 Report Share Posted July 5, 2010 I think 'zone members and coaches are over-rating our depth, For the 1st time in forever, we have five preseason games. Even if you assume that the HOF game against Dallas will be no more strenuous than the mock / intrasquad contests in training camp, i believe we need as much camp fodder as we can get.The following will see little or no play the last 3 quarters of the HOF game (Dal), the last 2 quarters plus in preseason games 2 & 3 (DEN & PHI), the 4th quarter of game 4 (at Buf), and maybe one series at Ind in game 5:OFFENSEQB: Carson PalmerRB: Cedric BensonFB: WR: Chad OchocincoWR: Antonio Bryant? C: ?LT: Andrew Whitworth RT: Andre SmithLG: Jason Shirley RG: Bobbie WilliamsTE: Reggie KellyDEFENSELE: Robert Geathers RE: Antwan Odom LDT: Tank Johnson RDT: Domata Peko SLB: Rey Maualuga MLB: Dhani Jones WLB: Keith Rivers RCB: Leon Hall LCB: Johnathan Joseph SS: Roy Williams FS: Chris CrockerWith a couple of holdouts, suspensiona, and / or injuries at the same position, we can get pretty thin - then they'd need to ask 1 or 2 subs to play 13 - 14 preseason quarters, or expose a starting veteran.My biggest concerns would be at DT, OT, SS, and especially RB. Thoughts?In light of the on going Benson saga, you have to be concerned about the RB position. I'll admit we have other players there that have shown promise, but they haven't established themselves as Cedric has done. Whether that is do to lack of opportunities, or lack of ability remains to be seen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 I'm fine with the o-line. Agreed, but the penalties do jump out. However, a second glance reveals how identical the units of Baltimore and Cincy are...right down to their fondness for penalty flags. That said, Cincy's unit has the potential to get a huge upgrade this season from Andre Smith. Meanwhile, Baltimore didn't add a player of comparable talent and any improvement the Ravens hope to get is linked to their controversial attempt to move Oher to OLT...pushing out a very effective Gaither. In regards to the Livings/Mathis debate....I'm not convinced there is one. Just an example of a better player (Mathis) rarely being completely healthy....giving almost equal opportunity to a less talented but more physical player. Last, it's ranking like these that make me wonder why so many still consider Pittsburgh worthy of playoff consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 Looking over the entire roster, my main fear with this team is that we'll continue to see poor pass protection. If that happens, even with new weapons and an improved playbook, they will still feature a very one dimensional offense. That's not all bad (I enjoyed it thoroughly last year), but I think without a real threat of a passing game, this team has a relatively low ceiling. Perhaps, but only if you're defining a "low ceiling" along the lines of......playoff contender/championship pretender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 Looking over the entire roster, my main fear with this team is that we'll continue to see poor pass protection. If that happens, even with new weapons and an improved playbook, they will still feature a very one dimensional offense. That's not all bad (I enjoyed it thoroughly last year), but I think without a real threat of a passing game, this team has a relatively low ceiling. Perhaps, but only if you're defining a "low ceiling" along the lines of......playoff contender/championship pretender.That's almost word for word how I would describe it.Another way to describe it would be one and done. It's better than not making the playoffs at all... but only slightly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted July 6, 2010 Report Share Posted July 6, 2010 Looking over the entire roster, my main fear with this team is that we'll continue to see poor pass protection. If that happens, even with new weapons and an improved playbook, they will still feature a very one dimensional offense. That's not all bad (I enjoyed it thoroughly last year), but I think without a real threat of a passing game, this team has a relatively low ceiling. Perhaps, but only if you're defining a "low ceiling" along the lines of......playoff contender/championship pretender.That's almost word for word how I would describe it. Well then, is that really so bad when you consider how this isn't a finished product? Granted, the team is a legit playoff contender as is, but the passing game that gives you so much concern is newly constructed....mostly from new parts, and IMHO that's cause for optimism.Another way to describe it would be one and done. One and done because the Jets were even better at grinding than the Bengals. But would that have been true had the Bengals matched up against a hollow soon to be exposed Patriot team? Or a Raven team they had already beaten twice? Or a San Diego team they had come within seconds of beating? It's better than not making the playoffs at all... but only slightly. (((shrug))) I'm reminded of the Dark Days, when my fondest hope was to see the Bengals survive August and September well enough to play meaningful football games in December. This is better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted July 7, 2010 Report Share Posted July 7, 2010 I'm surprised anyone is getting ruffled up over what was admittedly something thrown together and with the thinking of how it probably won't turn out.I can't say as anything put together in regards to a depth chart would give me much concern at this point in time.It is something to talk about I suppose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted July 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2010 I'm surprised anyone is getting ruffled up over what was admittedly something thrown together and with the thinking of how it probably won't turn out.Hey it's Bengalszone...It's in the by-laws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted August 27, 2010 Report Share Posted August 27, 2010 I'm starting to think Fui Will be stored on the Pup then if he's not needed 6 weeks in IR'd..I'm guessing the same with Tom Nelson...PS, wasn't sure where else to post this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted August 27, 2010 Report Share Posted August 27, 2010 Can't store Fui on the pup, can they? I thought he practiced in camp before getting hurt... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.