ArmyBengal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 This is the place to discuss everything there is about who the Bengals take in the 2nd round...WHODEY !!!
ChadJohnson-85 Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Chris Johnson in round 2? Or defense, Laws.
Kazkal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Chris Johnson = last years chris henry?Meh I like the Beaver RB in rnd 4 or so.....5'8 205 he can be our jones drew but better character.PS,I want laws in rnd 2.
ArmyBengal Posted April 26, 2008 Author Report Posted April 26, 2008 It has to be the DT position... Sadly I think they need to trade up to get Laws and I just don't see it happening...WHODEY !!!
Spor_tees Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 I like Laws also but Frank Okam would prolly be a guy more likely still there for them
BengalszoneBilly Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 It has to be the DT position... Sadly I think they need to trade up to get Laws and I just don't see it happening...WHODEY !!!I believe it has to be a defensive lineman at this point.
membengal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 That's three new LBers this off-season, four if you count the return of Odell.They also signed Odom to replace Smith.Given how deep the draft is at WR, I think they will go to that position in Round 2.
Kazkal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 For right WR I would not complain about one in rnd 2... just perfer rnd 3 WR if the right DT is there in rnd 2.
HairOnFire Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Way too soon to guess who'll be available, but I mocked Rivers in the 1st and Laws in the 2nd. Opinions seem really mixed on Laws as some love him and others see a 3rd round type. Put me in the love camp. Fingers crossed. BTW, I don't like Pat Sims much and wouldn't give him a sniff until the late 3rd.
BlainThePain Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Put in me in the group hoping for Laws.Being that this is the Bengals we're talking about, Laws will get drafted right before us and we will take Malcolm Kelly.
Kazkal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Hmmm 3rd round for 17-15 when it was a 3rd for 7-10? doesn't seem right but still great first 2 picks for chiefs.
COB Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 I'll take Trevor Laws. He sure as hell fills a need, one that we ignored in round 1. A lot of scouts thought Laws was great, but his defensive line help was so incredibly weak that he face double and sometimes triple teams. Other high DT picks had a lot more help. So maybe there is more ability there than is immediately apparant from his tape. I'm still pissed at the Bengals just sitting on there asses and getting aced out for a player that would have hardly cost anything to jump up and get. Is this draft / trade up / trade down process just too sophisitcated for the Bengals front office? So far in this draft season, refusing a windfall offer for aging, disgruntled player, then getting snaked on your target player - I'm not impressed.
ShulaSteakhouse Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Ok I'm thoroughly tired of this UnderArmour commercial, one of the worst ever
BlainThePain Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Ok I'm thoroughly tired of this UnderArmour commercial, one of the worst everIt's not as bad as the one last year that had Steve Spurrier saying "click clack"
Bobcat Bengal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Give me Malcom Kelley or Early Doucet.
BigBenBlows Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Ok I'm thoroughly tired of this UnderArmour commercial, one of the worst everMe too Shula, with that said I would like to see Dexter Jackson WR from Appalachian St. This dude is a little short at 5' 9" 180lbs but runs a 4.27 40. That is unbelieveable speed and would give us the deep threat since ocho stinko is being a jackass.
ArmyBengal Posted April 26, 2008 Author Report Posted April 26, 2008 The Bengals front office just seems complacent in their mediocrity. One line in the article on the .com site said it all..."But the Bengals were CONTENT to take Rivers"Content ?? Wow, hardly sounds like an organization trying to put a winning product on the field.WHODEY !!!
COB Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 No thanks B cubed. An undersized receiver? D tackle only, in my mind.
HairOnFire Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 BPA at DT. No, BPA period. Let's not get locked in. If Balmer doesn't drop and Laws is off the board I 'd rather shop for other needs with the 2nd round pick than reach for a DT....even at the risk of not adding one.
Kazkal Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 Maybe they felt they could get a good DT in rnd 2 vs the LB's that would be available? meh I really hope we see a DT fall to us in rnd 2 that would help the wounds.....
kingwilly Posted April 26, 2008 Report Posted April 26, 2008 I'll take Trevor Laws. He sure as hell fills a need, one that we ignored in round 1. A lot of scouts thought Laws was great, but his defensive line help was so incredibly weak that he face double and sometimes triple teams. Other high DT picks had a lot more help. So maybe there is more ability there than is immediately apparant from his tape. I'm still pissed at the Bengals just sitting on there asses and getting aced out for a player that would have hardly cost anything to jump up and get. Is this draft / trade up / trade down process just too sophisitcated for the Bengals front office? So far in this draft season, refusing a windfall offer for aging, disgruntled player, then getting snaked on your target player - I'm not impressed.Sims, Laws....Caldwell....or whoever slips and has value (as a Whit or Steiny did).
Recommended Posts