AMPHAR

Shemar's team loves drama and not too smart. Sure. 1. Fight NCAA. Incur legal fees and hope for a quick resolution in time for the college season. If you believe that is viable...point 2. 2. Fight United States labor laws. Because the NFLPA CBA says his rights remain to Bengals if he plays college football or any other league. More legal fees and still need a fast resolution in time for college or CFL season. If you believe points 1 and 2 are still viable or need another "yeah but'... 3. He sits out. Doesn't play and reenters the draft. That will show the Brown family! So if you believe any portion of 1,2 or 3 is viable then point 4: 4. Over half the league uses the clause on their current first round picks. But maybe your sitting here thinking its only half the league and with his NIL money that hasn't been spent on legal fees from 1 and 2 he still could come out ahead or slightly damaged its worth the fight vs. the evil Brown family well then point 5: 5. Clause doesn't change his money. It only changes the timing and form of payment. So say he agrees to all clauses and negotiates a favor payment schedule. Violate a clause he doesn't lose money at that point. It converts to salary which he earns. OH YEAH! THAT's the whole point he could get screwed by the fucking Brown family.... So at this point if you think points 1,2,3, and 4 could favor hims and its worth avoiding the Brown family scheme in point 5 just so they can cut him without cause OK point 6: 6. IF the Bengals unjustly cut Shemar before his rookie deal because he violated a clause. If he's under 3 years vested he hits wavier wire so any claiming team picks up remaining contract. If he's over 3 years he hits FA free to get paid. So if your still sitting here thinking that Shemar has any power left or this fucking contract drama would still be worth it point 7: 7. I can't recall the Bengals ever cutting a 1st, 2nd or 3rd round pick during their rookie deal that ultimately wasn't universally agreed upon by the fan base. Meaning you must suck and even still I don't recall them cutting to many. But if your still beating this drum and its not the reality that matters its the principal that Brown family can't keep doing this then point 8: 8. You'll always be trolled by bad reporting. It has hit the fucking stupid stage. It 100% a dumb agent team.

This is a tiny town, boy. We don't like your kind around here. lol.

It was reported the clause in question is actually used across the NFL. It was also shown rookies without contracts practiced in voluntary and mandatory camps. Shemar's camp could have had him practice and negotiated the clause. There's was only 1 stupid action and it was on the part of Shemar's camp. Sorry if reality is such a burden to your point of view. Seeing all the blatant wrong hot takes all off season you'd think some fans would learn. You are not getting objective viewpoints You are getting agent propaganda most of the time spun into something they know that plays with a lot of the fan base for clicks etc. Edit: It has also been pointed out none of these clauses change the earning potential of the player. It just voids the guarantee nature of the payment. It was dumb to hold the player out over this. A fan that took sides with his camp was lied too initially. Period. Believe what you want.

The only stupid act was committed by the Shemar camp. They took him off the field. There was an easy observation to be made. 2nd round pick ON THE FIELD without contract. Miss number 1. Miss number 2 is not posing that question to the player not practicing because of contract issues. So what does it matter what Joe thinks? He doesn't have clue as to what was or wasn't offered. He makes good youtube videos a real journalist makes the observation. lol. Florio. That report is probably bullshit. Fans that are predetermined that the front office is somehow going to pull the football from them are easily trolled. There's already reports showing previous first round picks of the Bengals getting a higher percentage of money up front when compared to other teams.

Supposedly out of 40 draft picks unsigned. Shemar is the only 1 that didn't participate in practice. Hard to defend that. Its a shame so local media personalities ran with first story just to bash an organization without simple follow ups. Guys like Dehner, Mo, Pike, Rapien, Gooberry. What a bunch of clowns.

Nah. He could have and should have been on the field. 2nd round pick was and doesn't have a contract. Then he's holding a "fight" over what is now reported as common in the NFL and the picks before and after have it. That's a complete 180 from how it was described. His team probably lost points with the local guys because they ran with his story and now they look stupid as well. Negative fans, sports fans in general are easily trolled.

The kicker always take the hit for misses. New holder, snapper etc can play a big role. Overall that apart of the game was apart of costing them playoffs unfortunately. Still say defense and OL were the top factors but missed FGs or maybe some opportunities they didn't take cost them as well.

This most likely comes from the Bengals as his source. No reason why Shemar couldn't enjoy Zac's mini camp just like the 2nd round pick that also isn't signed. Shemar has dug in over a common practice. Great. Makes me wonder if Shemar has something in his past that isn't publically known. I hope not. What a horrible job of representing this player. Might as well advise Andre Smith to run a 40 yard dash without his shirt on.

Golden is very good with the media. You can tell he's a former HC. I don't think he'll be with the Bengals very long.

2nd round pick is unsigned and was on the field. His contract negotiations are not in the media because he chose to be on the field. Shemar's camp chose a different path then went public with it. His dad has been on the radio and Shemar called out the front office earlier in the week. The guy has gotten bad advice or simply isn't making good choices. Sure taking shots at the front office will get immediate positive reaction from a segment of the fanbase. Then reality sets. He still is a draft pick the majority of Bengal world hated at the time. A lot of the national NFL ridiculed him at the time despite mock drafts having him as a solid first rounder. Just dumb to be acting the way he is. He could have been on the field and simultaneously fought any clause he wanted to and put nothing at risk. What happens if/when he pulls a hammy, gets off to a slow start or whatever after making such a fuss? The segment of the fan base that cheered him when he took his shot at the front office will flip on his ass so fast. Once the emotion from the negative portion of the fan base wears off and it always does because those fans aren't objective. I hope he gets off to a hot start. I'd hate to be him if he has 0 sacks entering week 3. Its somewhat sad he's being used by an agent and the media that need clicks to pander to a negative sports fan.

Same logic applies to him. He sat out when he could have played. He has put his career on hold in favor trying to win a contract dispute. Its NFL business. If you are annoyed by it quit reading/listening to outlets that are trolling you.

This is in an example: The below suggest Chase could have taken $3.8m in the form of salary. Meaning he earns it game by game. His agent got him a roster bonus instead. I'm guessing the appeal is he gets his money in August vs. waiting and risking it being cut sometime before 17 games was up. Crazy to think about that now but at the time he's a draft pick and who knew what his career could have been? If you apply that to Myles Murphy. I don't know what his payment structure is. But for his sake I hope its roster bonus because he could find himself on the outside looking in because he has under performed. But the action of turning the payment in roster bonus caused the offset language or clause. Take it as salary the need for the clause becomes void because wouldn't earn it without being rostered. I think the agent isn't wrong. But neither are the Bengals. I think the further it goes I think the agent is doing a disservice to his client. However, I think the over effects of losing May, June or even July practices is exaggerated. Just NFL business.

I think you need to read that article. You've been misled or trolled by the media that has been pushing the agents view. 1. Shemar could have practiced. Not required to but there was nothing contractual from stopping him. It 100% wrong to try to spin that as a contract dispute. His team chose to make that statement. 2. Offset clauses are and have been common practice league wide. The agent is playing semantics describing it as new. I guess the wording might have never been used but they clearly have signed rookies with protection clauses. See the Chase example above. I don't know for sure but I would guess the Bengals would be completely agreeable to the most conservative payment structure allowed with minimal additional language. The player wouldn't. As they hammer out the payment structure clauses get inserted to protect the team. Does the guy want to play NFL football or not?

Myles Murphy gave up his captain crunch. He don't give no fucks about Shemar's reporting date. Shemar was always walking into a battle for snaps any first round DL was with this roster. The time he missed is easily replaced at this point. If the hold out is used as some kind of excuse then probably was never the player they thought. Myles Murphy going into year 3. Always looked out of shape. Boom cuts out cereal. Maybe that's the magic pill. Maybe Shemar shows up and is the freak we hoped and sends Murphy on his way. There's just a bunch of guys in Shemar's way working with their NFL lives on the line. A former 5 star, SEC player knows the drill of camp competition and would easily figure out a way to supplement missed camp time. Bloggers/Reporters are good at words but don't recognize that dynamic because they are good a words not running thus its about feelings. Probably played no cut sports up until middle school if they played at all.

Al seems pretty confident he's got talent to work with. But that could be his personality and persona when talking to the media. Very upbeat in his last interview. How that plays out on the field is anybody's guess at this point.

Offset language concerning guarantee money has been a reality the whole time under the rookie slotting system. I believe this is pointing out Chase got a payment sooner based on being on the roster vs. earning it over the 17 weeks of the season in the form of salary. The offset language was he couldn't hold out. I believe the hot take generators troll negative fans with this kinda of stuff. If fans feel the need to take sides. I'd suggest reading the below and probably realize they aren't getting the whole picture. Informative article below https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/agents-take-2025-nfl-rookie-contract-projections-for-key-round-1-picks-with-wage-scale-explainer/

The morning camps are a welcome change, IMO. I'll try to make one. A lot cooler.

I wonder if the Colts ever got involved with Pratt? Pratt had some great moments in the stripes.

Other rookies participated in voluntaries without contracts on the wavier. He refused. Thus any reps he missed is his fault, period. Of course you aren't going to acknowledge the reason this clause could be necessary. But those are the reasons why these type of things are popping up and have been for a while. I think the Bengals are completely justified in asking/demanding those clauses be included. Any team is, IMO. If you aren't going to acknowledge players have been taken off the field by the league office for things that don't even deal with criminal charges then maybe you are biased. So that's the defense you asked for. There have been actual missed training camp time under the rookie slotted system because of wording dealing with recovery of guarantees. So I don't think teams see it as relative pocket change. I don't think its accurate to paint this as a Bengal issue and no other team attempts to do this. They have.

1st - Defense on field last week. Shemar's refusal to sign an injury wavier and not practice has nothing to do with the clause. Multiple rookies practiced without contracts. I think the agent and player were 100% wrong in that. I think it shows the agent maybe putting his business ahead of Shemar's reputation. 2nd - I don't think anything is being lost with these missed reps. If you believe this has any effect on the locker room / winning/losing. You are being trolled. I think Shemar Stewart could sit out an entire season and not be missed. I didn't really love the draft pick at the time. Had to do a bunch of research to figure out. If this goes long you really have to start to question his personal pride. Does he have it to succeed at the NFL level? How can a player with any pride get shit on so much for having 1.5 sacks, in his mind drop in the draft, and let an agent use him and miss important time? I don't think he will and he'll get plenty of reps and all this hub bub will be proven as click bait. 3rd - You are wrong about it being out of thin air. Teams have attempted these clauses over several years with rookies. Some successful, some not. Go research. The ones that accept it aren't advertised as much as the agencies that fight them. Why? My guess is that the agents wants to protect their rep for future clients. Bengals have attempted it in the past. Myles Murphy practiced on a rookie wavier then came to an agreement without the clause. The Bengals may have even gotten it in deals. You'll never know because those players prioritize getting the reps and don't fuss about it. 4th - Like it or not the Bengals will ALWAYS be 100% justified for demanding that clause under the current environment. How many times to you need to witness Goodell using the NFL office sorward to invoke punishment for things that weren't criminally involved? Justin Tucker. One of the more popular players in Baltimore. Very community involved. Accused of rub and tugs. Has denied it. No criminal charges. Team cuts him. I don't care how anyone feels over the Watson/Tucker or any other situation. The fact that these situations are not rarities anymore justify the clause. If you are against Shemar Stewart being forced to deny the clause then don't stand on your morality soap box and preach about them being cut either. I say get prevent the bad actors from entering. Then get them out fast. But you got a union that protects them. Thus you have clauses that protect the team. NFL business. Not worth consuming opinion trying to equate a contract dispute to overall winning/losing, IMO. 5th - How many of the hot take generators shit on mock drafts choosing Shemar? How many after the pick? How many are now telling you the front office is evil because he's not practicing? Just seems to me they go with whatever generates clicks.

I remain skeptical about any magic transformation of the run game. I think its important to scheme things to your players strengths of course. I think dedicating reps in practice, preseason are more important. I think the week to week game planning is most important. Not impossible to transform your identity buts its hard. Patriots under BB were great at it. IMO, Burrow AND Zac have a little Dan Marino bug in them when it comes to the running game. Two HOF coaches with Marino could never get the running game going with him. But protecting the passer will always remain the top priority so I just think they'll spend more time doing that vs. getting pad level low and removing people from LOS. It shows.

I don't think the front office is wrong. I won't think they are right either IF it moves into July. I think they are justified in asking for the clause given what I've read. What were your thoughts on Jackson Carmen's sex assault charges? I bet you'd think he should have a clause after you found out about it. What have been your thoughts on Watson and Tucker? None of those involved any criminal charges but could have effected their ability to play in the NFL because Goodell loves to play investigator. Whole bunch of Bengal fans wanted Burton cut. The team is automatically in the wrong because Shemar's team says so? Every time an off the field incident happens the first response from message board fans seems to be "Get him off the team". Well this clause would help do exactly that. So are you pro player or pro front office? Then I think Shemar is 100% in the wrong for not being on the field when other rookies without contracts were prior to mandatory. I do question his willingness to compete for a job. Although I wasn't excited about the pick in the first place and also think he's in for fight for snaps the entire year even if he was on the field. Sure he doesn't like the clause holding him accountable. Fine. But other rookie players were on the field prior to mandatory. I think its fair to question the motive of the agent too. So why would you automatically point an laugh at those rebuttals? Personally I think there is enough shit heads that are good at football and you have a jackass union protecting their right to be apart of the league the Teams are well within their right to protect the money they are handing out. If the player is pissed that he individually is painted with the same brush as "bad" apple look at your union. But that's just me.

This board, lol. OMG don't let them make the playoffs. It might suggest they know what they are doing. I can't believe someone typed that to be read. WTF? Emotional. Just NFL business.

Bengals automatically get better at RT with no Watt. Yeah. Interesting situation up in Pitt. They've successfully found/replaced the edge rush LB for about 30 years. Noticeable difference when Watt is out but he is also aging. They are due for about 10 years of draft busts at that spot.

I don't even know if the OL can get it together so everyone will have a nice PFF grade. Is it possible? Given the way TC is conducted, game play calling, QB? I don't know. I know they seem to play worse than normal in the first month of the season. That goes hand in hand with the QB also struggling early. On one hand they've been top 10 offense missing a decent amount of snaps from Higgins with a bad OL. Its just been so long from a time under Alexander were you could expect a sack a game average. Now the 3 sack game people are applauding. Does Joe need to throw away more, check down more? Obviously they don't fire a OL coach and replace two starters IF everything is just great. Its been bad. I just have my doubts fans are ever going to have on paper proof the OL is fixed. Joe Burrow doesn't play that way and Zac doesn't call a game that way. IF Higgins is on the field more often, I doubt any of the play calling gets easier on the OL. Production probably goes up tho.