Wraith Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 After watching Gresham make dumb penalty after dumb penalty I have been wondering whether pluses out weigh the negatives....I guess we will find out this Sunday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 He is ? so there's a chance he still plays. I worry about the MLB position with Rey and Boley who is doubtful wont play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Yah, LB injuries are killing us. As for Jermaine, that holding call last week was total bullcrap. Should have been a TD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Yah, LB injuries are killing us. As for Jermaine, that holding call last week was total bullcrap. Should have been a TD.Yes it was a craptastic call and it cost them the game! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essexjohnson Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 If Gresh is out, it definitely hurts us. He starts every week for a reason. He is our best option. I really get tired of the bashing. Would I like more consistency - sure. Do I think he is still a young player with upside who hasn't reached his potential? you bet. If we lose him in FA next year, I believe he will be missed and hard to replace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Could this mean Orson Charles might finally have an opportunity to prove they were right in keeping him ??I mean that would be a first this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottishbengal Posted November 9, 2013 Report Share Posted November 9, 2013 Could this mean Orson Charles might finally have an opportunity to prove they were right in keeping him ??Or possibly go with more single tight end 3 wide-out sets allowing Hawkins to get on the field ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted November 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 And the answer is yes, it made a big difference I believe Gresham not playing was the difference between beating the Ravens and losing to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Yup. For all the crap Gresh takes, much of it deserved, the guy is averaging nearly four catches a game, and almost half, 18 of his 33 grabs, have been for first downs. Could have used those yesterday.Then again, he could have just joined the follies, who knows? We saw Hawk get the ball and immediately fumble, Green with what should have been a fumble, Jones have a ball go through his arms for a pick. Blech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 One note of interest. The dumbass web site pointed out that yesterday with no Gresh they were in two TE sets for fewer than 30 plays, versus 11 personnel for 50 snaps. So basically yesterday they ran a completely different O than they have been all year on a windy day that was murder for 3 WR sets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.