Walrus Posted September 27, 2007 Report Share Posted September 27, 2007 I'm looking forward to seeing what Marvin is cooking up for this one. Another flea-flicker? Fake punt? Maybe Skyler Green on a double-reverse? The ol' Statue of Liberty play? Gotta let it all hang out to bring home the W in this one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenyon1977 Posted September 29, 2007 Report Share Posted September 29, 2007 Seems as though some people just need to be punched in the neck.Drop your purse and root for your team. Damn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelerFan87 Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 I've decided I think I might root for the Bengals on Monday. Maybe. What can I say? I like underdogs. And I don't like the Pats. And, based on this thread, I don't really mind if the Bengals win. I mean, it's one thing when Bengals fans are all talking s**t about how awesome they are and how they're going to win all teh Super Bowlz!!!111!, but times like this, when it's just a bunch of ordinary fans hoping their team will win, desperate for something to get excited about, instead of being arrogant and cocky, I just know I won't enjoy rubbing it in your faces if you lose. I think I'd prefer to rub it in Pats fans' faces. Good luck on Monday.WHO D-no, no I can't bring myself to ever say that ridiculous chant. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 I've decided I think I might root for the Bengals on Monday.Hold on pardner. You just might hurt yourself here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalsfansince68 Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 why are fans so quick to throw in the towel? because fans are smart and experienced! Excuse me? You have got to be f-ing kidding me! Judging by this post I'd say you ain't all that smart or experienced. Our fans throw in the towel more because too many of them are freakin' puss**s who can't get over the nightmare of the nineties.We haven't been to the superbowl since 1989. While you are pissing and moaning about no super bowl since the '88 season, bear in mind that there are 8 teams in this league that have never made a super bowl. 43 years.So we went 11-5 a couple of seasons ago...big deal...did we go to the playoffs?...NO Did we go to the playoffs? YES, get your head out of your rectum. There's a difference between being optimistic and being a sucker.There is also a difference between being a sucker and being a numnutz.Take your Bungles and shove it rectal wart!Sorry fellas, but the constant feminine bitching by a significant percentage of our fan base sucks and the term Bungles from one of our own fans really SUCKS!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damiancasey Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 why are fans so quick to throw in the towel? because fans are smart and experienced! Excuse me? You have got to be f-ing kidding me! Judging by this post I'd say you ain't all that smart or experienced. Our fans throw in the towel more because too many of them are freakin' puss**s who can't get over the nightmare of the nineties.We haven't been to the superbowl since 1989. While you are pissing and moaning about no super bowl since the '88 season, bear in mind that there are 8 teams in this league that have never made a super bowl. 43 years.So we went 11-5 a couple of seasons ago...big deal...did we go to the playoffs?...NO Did we go to the playoffs? YES, get your head out of your rectum. There's a difference between being optimistic and being a sucker.There is also a difference between being a sucker and being a numnutz.Take your Bungles and shove it rectal wart!Sorry fellas, but the constant feminine bitching by a significant percentage of our fan base sucks and the term Bungles from one of our own fans really SUCKS!!Just curious, 68...what the hell is the matter with you? If you have a point you want to make you need to stop the name calling and start making intelligent arguments.If there's something else going on in your life that's getting you worked up - then get your frustrations out someplace else - not here.You're acting like a 3rd grader. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 Can't we all just get along? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damiancasey Posted September 30, 2007 Report Share Posted September 30, 2007 Can't we all just get along? HA!! Well put!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalsfansince68 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Just curious, 68...what the hell is the matter with you? What's the matter with me? You want to know what's the matter with me? Let me tell ya.All the womanly bitching pisses me off! People who spew a lot of nauseating BS despite being unable to see the big picture, piss me off. YOU pissed me off, Mr. Bungles!I am no fan of Mike Brown either, but the fact is, a large part of this offense was in place and the organization stepped up pretty big by extending damn near the entire offense save for Steiny. What the hell do people like you expect? Did you expect that they would be able to extend the entire offense and still be able to pick off 6 or 8 major FA defensive players? No, it was not going to work that way.Open your eyes, ace. The plan was to keep our good players, mostly offensive, and build a defense, where there was none, by putting together a bunch of good young defensive players. I believe that Marvin did that! Marvin had to completely make over the defense from the God awful '02 squad. Do you really think that is so easy? Do you think that it is easy when you, as coach, Mr Damien, lose your 1st round pick in '04, your 1st and 2nd round picks in '05 as well as the guy you were forced to draft in '07 because your '04 1st round pick can't play back to back games. Were Pollack and Thurman running around making the plays that they are capable of, this defense would be vastly better than it is right now. Perry was exactly what our offense needs and if he had been healthy we would not have had to draft a replacement in '07 and would have been able to select another good young defensive player. Plus, you sir, lose a stud receiver for more than half of a season. The building of this team has been absolutely snake-bitten. Despite the unprecedented adversity, you expect and demand a Super Bowl Trophy.To all of you chronic bitchers, I say...The super bowl is not your F-ing birthright nor is it as easy to achieve as the constant complainers seem to believe, Christ!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damiancasey Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Just curious, 68...what the hell is the matter with you? What's the matter with me? You want to know what's the matter with me? Let me tell ya.All the womanly bitching pisses me off! People who spew a lot of nauseating BS despite being unable to see the big picture, piss me off. YOU pissed me off, Mr. Bungles!I am no fan of Mike Brown either, but the fact is, a large part of this offense was in place and the organization stepped up pretty big by extending damn near the entire offense save for Steiny. What the hell do people like you expect? Did you expect that they would be able to extend the entire offense and still be able to pick off 6 or 8 major FA defensive players? No, it was not going to work that way.Open your eyes, ace. The plan was to keep our good players, mostly offensive, and build a defense, where there was none, by putting together a bunch of good young defensive players. I believe that Marvin did that! Marvin had to completely make over the defense from the God awful '02 squad. Do you really think that is so easy? Do you think that it is easy when you, as coach, Mr Damien, lose your 1st round pick in '04, your 1st and 2nd round picks in '05 as well as the guy you were forced to draft in '07 because your '04 1st round pick can't play back to back games. Were Pollack and Thurman running around making the plays that they are capable of, this defense would be vastly better than it is right now. Perry was exactly what our offense needs and if he had been healthy we would not have had to draft a replacement in '07 and would have been able to select another good young defensive player. Plus, you sir, lose a stud receiver for more than half of a season. The building of this team has been absolutely snake-bitten. Despite the unprecedented adversity, you expect and demand a Super Bowl Trophy.To all of you chronic bitchers, I say...The super bowl is not your F-ing birthright nor is it as easy to achieve as the constant complainers seem to believe, Christ!!!!OK - still sounds like there are some anger management issues in there but overall a much better argument.I see your point. You get a sucker! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 I'm just hoping the Patriots don't pull anymore cheapshots like they did on Losman:Got those rose-colored glasses out yet Billy? God, how I hate the Patriots. Look at that cheap shot, what a blatant attempt to injure. I want to puke reading all over how awesome the Patriots are. Do we run and hide just because we're facing a formidable opponent? Heck no, just step up your game, get the first punch in and see where it all settles. If you went through the Salt Lake City airport after Thursday last week, you may have noticed all the copies of the GQ 50th Anniversary issue in the newstand in Concourse B, lower level, had a dialogue box above Tom Brady's very pretty face that had him saying "I'm gay." So far, the score is: Scoundrel of questionable sexual orientation Tom Brady zero, My Blue Sharpie, 8. Get up for the game people, the Bengals are going to stomp on the terra! Bengals 43, Patriots 37. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 For what it is worth (not much), John Clayton, during his weekly Monday interview on the Pittsburgh radio station gives the Bengals little chance tonight, but did mention that with this Bengals team, it is possible. What I find most interesting is that he (the Steeler-kissing analyst that he is ... being from Pittsburgh) clearly said that Palmer is right now right there with Brady as the second best QB in the NFL behind Manning. I just found that interesting ... bet it rubs a lot of the local listeners the wrong way ... and that is always a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 Just curious, 68...what the hell is the matter with you? To all of you chronic bitchers, I say...The super bowl is not your F-ing birthright nor is it as easy to achieve as the constant complainers seem to believe, Christ!!!!I've witnessed one winning season with this team since I was 19 years old, ONE, and it took 14 years just to get there. I am now going on 38. How many other teams can say that?I was going to games during the mid-90's when no one else was in the stadium, now it's bandwagon heaven and nothing but drunk kids calling each other "dawg" and getting in fights, wearing costumes and "beads" (for whatever reason). They're eveywhere - and they'll be gone after a bad season or two and the rest of us old timers will still be here.Where were all these people 10 years ago? Some of us have earned the right! Just ignore it already, big deal. We cope in different ways.If you've "really" been a fan since '68, I would think you would understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalsfansince68 Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 OK - still sounds like there are some anger management issues in there but overall a much better argument.If you had not played the F-ing Bungles card your crap prolly would not have set me off.No need for anger management, but play that card again and you'll likely hear more.Are you a Bengals fan?Or are you a bungles fan?Or are you a stealers fan?Hard to tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 OK - still sounds like there are some anger management issues in there but overall a much better argument.If you had not played the F-ing Bungles card your crap prolly would not have set me off.No need for anger management, but play that card again and you'll likely hear more.Are you a Bengals fan?Or are you a bungles fan?Or are you a stealers fan?Hard to tell.You make a good point that continues to bug me. I can take it with the best of them ... especially compared to the thin-skinned 'everything Steeler-related is sacred' folk out there ... BUT ... I have come to the opinion that anyone who is clearly not a Bengals fan and uses the word 'bungles' should become a troll. Is that not a form of smack? Is that not degrading when coming from a non-Bengals fan? Maybe I'm getting old, and I am always happy to admit being wrong and happy to learn ... happy to take it on the chin and change my thinking ... but this is one I would love to hear Bengals fan's opinion on. Maybe it's just Monday morning in Pittsburgh :-) ... but I still think they should be warned, and thrown to troll status if they refuse to change. My two cents on a Monday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damiancasey Posted October 1, 2007 Report Share Posted October 1, 2007 OK - still sounds like there are some anger management issues in there but overall a much better argument.If you had not played the F-ing Bungles card your crap prolly would not have set me off.No need for anger management, but play that card again and you'll likely hear more.Are you a Bengals fan?Or are you a bungles fan?Or are you a stealers fan?Hard to tell.You make a good point that continues to bug me. I can take it with the best of them ... especially compared to the thin-skinned 'everything Steeler-related is sacred' folk out there ... BUT ... I have come to the opinion that anyone who is clearly not a Bengals fan and uses the word 'bungles' should become a troll. Is that not a form of smack? Is that not degrading when coming from a non-Bengals fan? Maybe I'm getting old, and I am always happy to admit being wrong and happy to learn ... happy to take it on the chin and change my thinking ... but this is one I would love to hear Bengals fan's opinion on. Maybe it's just Monday morning in Pittsburgh :-) ... but I still think they should be warned, and thrown to troll status if they refuse to change. My two cents on a Monday.I completely agree and that's actually a comment I made earlier. I don't mind poking fun at the Bengals or having fun poked at the Bengals...if it's another fan. Tends to get on my nerves (a little) if it's some one that pulls for another team. I compare it to picking on your brother - OK if you pick on your brother and OK if your brother picks on you...but someone not in the family pick on your brother - NOT OK.I'm fairly new here so I don't know exactly what constitues "troll" status - from what I can gather it's just other fans that come in here and start trash talking. I don't think you should be allowed in here either if your only intention is to scream unintelligent trash talk - that makes it no fun for anyone.That being said...68, I think you have a different definition of "fan". I think in your mind a fan is someone who not only supports a team but also avoids saying anything in the least bit critical about the team, the team's home city, the team's fans, or the team's logo - and NEVER would even think of having a sense of humor about the team. By that definition there wouldn't be very many fans out there and this message board would be pretty boring.WHO DEY!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalsfansince68 Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 That being said...68, I think you have a different definition of "fan". I think in your mind a fan is someone who not only supports a team but also avoids saying anything in the least bit critical about the team, the team's home city, the team's fans, or the team's logo - and NEVER would even think of having a sense of humor about the team. By that definition there wouldn't be very many fans out there and this message board would be pretty boring.You got all of that from two brief posts? Thanks for the analysis Sigmund Roid but your conclusions are flawed.There is reasoned criticizm and there is over the top ridiculous criticizm. The latter is what usually causes a response from me. You have never seen me take issue with any of the criticism of Bresnahan. I don't like Bratkowski much either but some of the bullsh*t that is heaped on Marvin daily on every board of which I am a member, gets pretty exasperatingly annoying. There are a whole lot of people who, if they are one tenth as football knowledgeable as they think they are, would be well on their way to the Canton.And, as Sgt. Hulka would say... "I got a hell of a sense of humor don't I Corporal?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted October 2, 2007 Report Share Posted October 2, 2007 Not good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.