AMPHAR

Because he's better than what Bengal fans think. He's got a lot of NFL references. He's worked with alot of successful starting NFL QBs. He's got an A+ resume 1. His dad Superbowl Head Coach Raiders. College head coach Nebraska. Currently know as one of the best NFL line coaches. Coached Zac Taylor at Nebraska. Zac Taylor infamously son in law to Mike Sherman. So that's a ton of contacts and references. 2. Peyton Manning speaks highly of Callahan. 3. QB coach for Stafford and Derek Carr. Since being with Bengals he's got Burrow and the sudden emergence of Jake Browning. I wouldn't say he's a hot prospect until you start seeing offers.

I'd go San Diego No. 1. You have a QB that would be a top 10 pick in the last few drafts in place and top 5 pick with a high probability of an elite WR being there.

Belichick not shy about mentioning Paul Brown as his big influence. He might be the greatest NFL coach ever. I think he was Bill Parcels secret sauce to the those Giants championship teams. You just got to laugh at that 1995 Browns Coaching staff that was fired after the season and not allowed to continue in Baltimore. Something like 9 total future Head Coaches and GMs. Including Saban.

I don't think its crap. We'll see if its true or not. The fact is they'll be starring at multiple players in the first two rounds with similar grades. You recognize the difficulty in projecting a tackle from college. Its a league wide issue there's plenty of average o-line like Jonah Williams getting drafted. However, draft one high enough that can only be a back up then you've got problems. NFL doesn't platoon OL and QBs very often. They platoon every other positional group. A Jackson Carmen, Smith, Hill sit around waiting for someone to get hurt or block PATs. Myles Murphy, DJ Turner, DJ Ivey, Zach Carter are at least getting some snaps each week.

Given the churn of bottom of the league QBs. Jake Browning certainly can throw his hat in the ring as starting caliber QB. I would say a highly limited starting QB but top 32? Sure, why not? Bottom half of QBs, the league is going to churn through those guys at a high pace. I'd want the Bengals to get at least a top 150 pick in a trade. IMO, he's the perfect back up right now. Unfortunately Burrow was out the remainder of the 2024 season but Browning with his legs could easily bridge the gap for the rest of a game or 2 pending the opponent. That's kinda what you need is a QB that can generate enough confidence it rally's the team. RT? I don't see the Bengals using a Round 1 or 2 pick on tackle based on what was stated last year. If what was said last year wasn't complete crap, I would expect them to try to resign Williams but ultimately drop 7-10m in cap room on a starting RT via FA.

Its awesome if he ends up participating. It seems he already has a top 15 grade based on some mocks. I hope he goes and competes.

It was rough for Battle too. I'm not sure what PFF is grading. Battle was involved in several bad pursuit angles that led to bigger gains almost every week it seemed. I think CTB, Dax, and Battle all have tremendous upside, IMO.

Hmmm only two good seasons since 2003. Tough crowd.

Didn't he come from the Raiders?

Is the offensive consistency really coordinator driven? Or is it the fact they rely upon Joe Burrow at the LOS a lot and he hasn't been available to practice in August for two years? Then somehow an average at best OL plays better football post bye week almost every year. The early season stats are just way different than what they do post bye week. I think the work they aren't doing in OTAs and TC are the issue. Zac does not put them in pads for benefit of the player.

They don't really have any critical Free Agent issues. Seems like a straight forward situation. Tag Tee. Then resign/replace marginal players. Hopefully Chase gets a summertime pay day.

Free Agency is basically 2 days of hot activity then slows down afterward the following weeks. Then every team goes into a hole focusing on the draft. 1. Reader. That's a summertime deal. Its unlikely any team swoops in and signs him up given the injury. Maybe bengals can get him short term deal in the summer as his recovery timeline is more known. I think they need to focus on adding youth to D-line via draft. 2. Higgins. Tag. Takes him off the market in the rush period. Prevent WR needy teams from crossing that off their list. Maybe they can get a big deal done, maybe not. If it comes to trade at least they may control his landing spot. What you do not want to happen is to have some AFC WR needy team sign him first hours of FA. Disaster, IMO. 3. Boyd - Walk. He's probably going to get more than Bengals want to pay. Replacements may already be here. Also dependent on Tee Higgins. Chase will also get paid. 4. TE. I'd resign Irv, Sample and Hudson. Roll it back. I'd only consider major investment via draft falling that way AND if it looks like Higgins is moving on. Can only line up 11. All these dudes are cheap and they clearly settled into roles in the offense. I assume the Bengals will offer them at minor increases and replace accordingly. 5. Jonah Williams - This is the classic 2 for 1 Tobin deal. Williams will sign in a range of 12-18m of cap room. Tobin will sign 2 vet FAs for that combined room. I just think he'll be too expensive for the Bengals. Hopefully they'll have the same amount of success as in the past. 6. Chido - Not sure if they'll resign him but they'll need to find a decent replacement. Literally can't have a weak spot in CBs spots 1-4 now a days. The "Mixon" crowd. Get over it. He's not the problem with the run game. The line and really team identity is the problem with run game IF they even see it as a problem at all. I don't really think they do. Mixon is lined up a good cap price. Only look to replace if the draft board falls. Dust settles then get a Chase extension done. If they so happen to get Higgins and Chase locked up long term that's one of the best offseasons.

Zac probably needs to bite the bullet and admit club med attitude during practice only goes so far. The Bengals look soft run blocking and soft run defense. Quit worrying about the injury boggie man and put the pads on a little more during August and throughout the season. Tackling and tackling pursuit angles were horrible this year. During these all-22 reviews that seemed to pop up a bunch. There were a lot of protection scheme break downs you wouldn't expect with the vets they have along the line. At times it seems like the Bengals are the worse team still in dealing with looping End and DT stunts. Even late in the season they aren't getting those handled correctly. Bengals front office seem pretty good at identifying talent so its hard to believe its a "talent" issue across the board. To me it just sounds like a lot of "not enough" practice reps crap.

That's actually not a bad list of possible "key" FAs considering $70m in cap room.

DJ can walk. Boyd can walk. Higgins - Tag. Hopefully long term deal, should listen to trades. Chido - Walk Williams - probably should try to re-sign but not a the price he'll get, walk. Jake Browning - Exclusive rights obvious keep. Irv Smith - walk I think they need some youth and freak athletes along the D-line. Would be great to have a versatile d-line defender that raise hell at DT/DE. That's the biggest area needed to battle both Cleveland and Baltimore. It will also help you against mobile QB in Buffalo and KC. How big you invest at TE depends on what happens with Higgins. CB and Secondary - just a position group that will always need to be added to.

Maybe Mike Brown ate yo baby! Bengals have a FA acquisition battling for NFL sack lead but yeah they'll probably sit on their hands and do nothing.

They didn't have a losing record either in 2022. They also beat a AFC North rival in the playoffs. Zac Taylor was 2-10 in his start vs. AFC North. Knowing he's won the division twice. Won playoff games. Since those season, does that record really concern you today? Are you waking up at night knowing Ryan Finley sucked so bad it cost them a chance beating the Steelers at home in 2019? I'm not. Then Zac is 0-5 this year. 0-2 is largely effected by Burrow's play which was incredibly bad due to practice time lost due to his injured calf. Then when you have 16 quarters of AFC North football left to play when Burrow was throwing up 100 ratings. Zac Taylor gets 2 quarters of that. I'm not concerned at all what happened post Joe Burrow injury. I'm actually encouraged because the team got itself back into the playoff race. The AFC North win/loss record is wasted blabbering. It means nothing to the Bengals. Nobody in the real world is basing anything off a slanted data point. While it sucks missing the playoffs. It was a heck of coaching job getting through the first part of the season with bad QB play and then late in the season with an undrafted cut several times QB. I

Yeah I have a little concern the Bengals overall will not be trying to put the best team on paper to win the Superbowl. I'm not sure what Hoosier was trying to state.

I'm pretty sure the Bengals won the division in 2021 and 2022.

I think this just proves no matter what changes the Bengals make. IF they don't make the playoffs they've actually done nothing since 1991. Either way trying to fix a problem based on Zac's overall record vs. AFC North seems like a colossal waste of time. There's no magic pill. If you have AFC North teams in Weeks 1 or 2, hope your QB can get some snaps and you might want to practice a little more. Don't try to play the AFC North teams with your 2019 roster.

I don't know about expectations. I think the AFC North record overall is pointless in regards to offseason plans. The results are different when a healthy franchise QB plays. That's a fact. So if you are dead set on using the overall AFC North record and dead set on making it a problem. How do you determine the source of the problem and solutions without factoring the effect of Joe Burrow? Should they alter their draft board? Fire a coach or coaches? Change overall scheme of defense/offense? Seems kinda drastic considering everyone saw the reality of Joe's calf injury week 1. Then saddled with 4 AFC North games post bye week and got to play 2 quarters with Burrow in those 4 games. The fact Zac went 2-10 vs. the AFC north with Dalton or whoever means little to me. Might mean a bunch to somebody, I dunno.

Tag Higgins. At the very least you can control when and most importantly were he goes. Leave him unrestircted he's gone in the first few hours of FA and it could be to some AFC contender. Tagging Lamar Jackson drove down his demands and got a deal for the Ravens. But if they didn't, they at least would have been able to ship out of division/conference.

Overblown. Does Zac's 2-10 start vs. the AFC North from 2019/2020 really matter today? I'd say no considering he's won it twice since then. Does the 0-5 record today from this season matter knowing a healthy Burrow took snaps for less than 2 quarters? I'd say no. 50% of those 29 games doesn't include the reality we expect for 2024 and beyond. A healthy Joe Burrow. Its only a problem if you are thinking the Bengals will be stuck playing the AFC North without a healthy Burrow. Zac Taylor 7-5 AFC North games with a healthy Joe Burrow. He's 2-15 without. Then he's also 1-0 vs. AFC North in the playoffs.

You simply tag Higgins if you want to keep him for next year.

Division struggles are overblown, IMO. The Burrow situation effected every division game. Of course the division will be competitive once again, but the biggest need there is to have a healthy QB1.