icehole3 Posted October 22, 2008 Report Share Posted October 22, 2008 Chad's saying the Bengals can finish 8-8 if they finish 7-1. Thats some fuzzy math right there.http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=7210 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted October 23, 2008 Report Share Posted October 23, 2008 Chad's saying the Bengals can finish 8-8 if they finish 7-1. Thats some fuzzy math right there.http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=7210The math ain't fuzzy. Just the thought process of the Bengals actually going 7-1 from here on out is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted October 23, 2008 Report Share Posted October 23, 2008 Chad's saying the Bengals can finish 8-8 if they finish 7-1. Thats some fuzzy math right there.http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=7210The math ain't fuzzy. Just the thought process of the Bengals actually going 7-1 from here on out is. Nothing about the topic....but just wanted to say thats one of the best sig's you've ever had Billy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted October 23, 2008 Report Share Posted October 23, 2008 Chad's saying the Bengals can finish 8-8 if they finish 7-1. Thats some fuzzy math right there.http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=7210The math ain't fuzzy. Just the thought process of the Bengals actually going 7-1 from here on out is. Nothing about the topic....but just wanted to say thats one of the best sig's you've ever had Billy.Thank you sir. As you well know, pimpin' ain't easy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of Chad... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregstephens Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of Chad...Sorry, buddy. Already been removed. Was it good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of Chad...Sorry, buddy. Already been removed. Was it good?I have no idea why that link isn't working, since the exact same one is still working (for me at last) elsewhere. You can get the summation here, tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walrus Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of Chad...Sorry, buddy. Already been removed. Was it good?I have no idea why that link isn't working, since the exact same one is still working (for me at last) elsewhere. You can get the summation here, tho.Hey, some of us wished we never got rid of Rudi Johnson. I'll take Rudy Johnson... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregstephens Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Speaking of Chad...Sorry, buddy. Already been removed. Was it good?I have no idea why that link isn't working, since the exact same one is still working (for me at last) elsewhere. You can get the summation here, tho.Hey, some of us wished we never got rid of Rudi Johnson. I'll take Rudy Johnson... Wow...that's about all I can say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Chad's Rudi is rather easy on the eyeballs. One wonders about her intellect, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.