HoosierCat Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 He got his close game! Wonder what the excuse will be next week...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 His excuse next week will be that he is still an a**h***? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMC Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 He got his close game! Wonder what the excuse will be next week...? They will always find something to put us down with....it will be funny to see what they come up with this week.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybren Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 He'll say that it shouldn't have been a close game, that it should have been a blow-out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 He'll say that we won the game on a bad call, along with at least 15 other reporters from various sites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Shannon can go pound sand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPW Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 He'll say that we won the game on a bad call, along with at least 15 other reporters from various sites.That would be presuming a lot ...That the Texans would have scored and then we wouldn't when we got the ball back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimersfan88 Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 he seemed sold on us in the post-game show. we'll see what he says tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted October 2, 2005 Report Share Posted October 2, 2005 Shannon Sharpe did seem happy with the Bengals after the game...I'm just waiting to hear all the bull s**t Jason Whitlock has ready to go for his next crappy column. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Despite the close game he'll probably complain that the Bengals haven't proven they can come from behind. Then again, unless they start using subtitles I doubt I'll be able to understand anything he says, good or bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 He got his close game! Wonder what the excuse will be next week...? Is that what he said. I couldn't understand him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeDan Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 He'll say that we won the game on a bad call, along with at least 15 other reporters from various sites.While the bad call didn't win you the game, it was STILL a VERY BAD call !!It would be nice to see officials receive penalties or reprimands for such gross incompetence !!Personally, I am pissed because your Bungholes didn't cover the spread for ME !!How great can you claim to BE when you only beat a lousy team like Houston by SIX ??Or is Houston not so bad because they held the "mighty" Bungholes to only a 16 to 10 win ??It has to be one or the other............... you simply CANNOT be great and only beat a LOUSY team by six !!Take Indy for instance, no denying they are great, but the Browns are not so bad after all, which makes it OK for the Colts to only win by six !! The Titans SUCK, on the other hand........soooooo...........But seriously, even the best of teams have a tough time once in awhile, heck, everyone knows that ALL THREE of the Patriots SB wins have come by a mere three points. Yet nearly everyone wants to call them a dynasty !!Now DON'T suck at Jax next week and above all else COVER THE BLOODY SPREAD !!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 He'll say that we won the game on a bad call, along with at least 15 other reporters from various sites.While the bad call didn't win you the game, it was STILL a VERY BAD call !!It would be nice to see officials receive penalties or reprimands for such gross incompetence !!Personally, I am pissed because your Bungholes didn't cover the spread for ME !!How great can you claim to BE when you only beat a lousy team like Houston by SIX ??Or is Houston not so bad because they held the "mighty" Bungholes to only a 16 to 10 win ??It has to be one or the other............... you simply CANNOT be great and only beat a LOUSY team by six !!Take Indy for instance, no denying they are great, but the Browns are not so bad after all, which makes it OK for the Colts to only win by six !! The Titans SUCK, on the other hand........soooooo...........But seriously, even the best of teams have a tough time once in awhile, heck, everyone knows that ALL THREE of the Patriots SB wins have come by a mere three points. Yet nearly everyone wants to call them a dynasty !!Now DON'T suck at Jax next week and above all else COVER THE BLOODY SPREAD !!!!Go away. We talk football here. We don't need irrational people who get mad because they bet on a game. A win is a win... and by the way, we lead the entire NFL in point differential, so we do beat bad teams by large margins- including your precious Browns in the Dawg Pound, as opposed to Indy's close game in their dome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeDan Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Go away. We talk football here.Oh........... my bad........... I musta been talking about the Cincinnati Bungholes TIDDLYWINKS team !!The thread topic was making Sharpe happy, so I kinda thought I'd throw in why I wasn't happy with how your game turned out........... not too much of a stretch, I thought !!....................................................................... feel free to go back to your absolutely RIVETING "football talk" now, derek !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Did Cleveland have a bye this week or did they lose their football team again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 BrowneyeDan....Don't get started about losing vs the spread after what your worthless Browneyes did (or did not do) vs Texas AT THE HORSESHOE!The (Il)logic you use to compare teams may as well have come from Shannon himself. Mushmouth makes more sense.Why don't you take your worthless comments elsewhere and go help Maurice Clarrett find a Canadian team he can actually make the roster for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Come on Guys, did 15 years of losing make you that touchy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 He'll say that we won the game on a bad call, along with at least 15 other reporters from various sites.While the bad call didn't win you the game, it was STILL a VERY BAD call !!It would be nice to see officials receive penalties or reprimands for such gross incompetence !!Personally, I am pissed because your Bungholes didn't cover the spread for ME !!How great can you claim to BE when you only beat a lousy team like Houston by SIX ??Or is Houston not so bad because they held the "mighty" Bungholes to only a 16 to 10 win ??It has to be one or the other............... you simply CANNOT be great and only beat a LOUSY team by six !!Take Indy for instance, no denying they are great, but the Browns are not so bad after all, which makes it OK for the Colts to only win by six !! The Titans SUCK, on the other hand........soooooo...........But seriously, even the best of teams have a tough time once in awhile, heck, everyone knows that ALL THREE of the Patriots SB wins have come by a mere three points. Yet nearly everyone wants to call them a dynasty !!Now DON'T suck at Jax next week and above all else COVER THE BLOODY SPREAD !!!! Dan....nice signature. The Bengals may owe their existence to the Browns....make that Paul Brown. Better yet make that Art Modell. First he screwed Paul Brown in 1962 and then he screwed Cleveland in 1995. The real Browns moved to Baltimore about 10 years ago in case you hadn't noticed. I am not sure who plays in Cleveland anymore. In fact I think the Rams were in Cleveland before the Browns. They bailed out too. Is it a trend?I also heard that Paul Tagliabue wants the Saints to move to San Antonio permanently. Maybe the Browns can move to New Orleans after that. I doubt that Cleveland will ever get another team if that happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeDan Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Come on Guys, did 15 years of losing make you that touchyThat's what I am wondering benboomer !!In case those stripes have affected your brains, I am WANTING YOUR TEAM TO WIN BY ENOUGH TO COVER THE SPREAD !!I am not saying they suck...........as you guys do the Browns......which is BS !! The Titans SUCK, the Ravens SUCK, the Niners SUCK, the Jets SUCK.... but not Cleveland !! I am not saying they are really even any less because they did not cover......well, maybe less than YOU guys say they are, but with me being a Browns fan, that's to be expected !!I AM saying they are plenty good enough to have covered the spread AND should have AND that I PICKED them to do so !!..........not to mention I will likely do so again this weekend.............but did I read that correctly ?? The Jags are a 2.5 point favorite ?? What MORON made THAT line ??...........never once in this thread did I smack your team, unless you count the comment about Bunghole greatness !! Which was really only surprise at them not playing as well as I thought they would (not too different than what YOU guys were thinking Sunday, I would wager !!).I'll save the ACTUAL smack for December in the proper place !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Your sig line provokes the smack.... Your backhanded toss of "winning by only six" or being great and only beating a lousy team by six.......NOOOOO you are not trolling at ALLLLL..Beg our pardon, sir. carry on.Here is a bet to take:Over/Under on Buckeye Dan's IQ Let's open at...about the average Brown/Buckeye fan IQ:82Any takers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Your sig line provokes the smack.... Your backhanded toss of "winning by only six" or being great and only beating a lousy team by six.......NOOOOO you are not trolling at ALLLLL..Beg our pardon, sir. carry on.Here is a bet to take:Over/Under on Buckeye Dan's IQ Let's open at...about the average Brown/Buckeye fan IQ:82Any takers?Better lay off the Buckeye comments when you include IQ and Cleveland. Just beacuse he likes the Bucks does not mean that everyone that does is slow like Brownie fans tend to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 You are right. I should not lump them all together.Without the Buckeye aspect, the IQ goes down.Let's reset the O/U for IQ to about....73 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeDan Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 Your sig line provokes the smack.... Your backhanded toss of "winning by only six" or being great and only beating a lousy team by six...Here is a bet to take:Over/Under on Buckeye Dan's IQ Let's open at...about the average Brown/Buckeye fan IQ:82Any takers? Sorry, but I am not going to change my sigline to suit YOU !! It IS what it IS !!..............and you wouldn't like (or probably believe) what my IQ is, so I won't bother mentioning it !! Take that to mean whatever you wish ............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrandom42 Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 You are right. I should not lump them all together.Without the Buckeye aspect, the IQ goes down.Let's reset the O/U for IQ to about....73$9000 on the Under! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted October 3, 2005 Report Share Posted October 3, 2005 I never said you should change it. You acted all surprised that you got jumped on and I pointed out that your sig provokes a particular response from me. Your statements/sig/attitude would be considered trolling by most folks. Spade a Spade, biznatch.I don't care what your IQ is as I'm interested in what everyone THINKS it is regarding my Over/Under on the subject.73 - Over/Under...PWNDwithEasy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.