jamesbrooks21 Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 I don't know about all of you but I'll definitely be watching what P-Dub does this year. I kind of had mixed emotions about his release and hope he does well.In the opening loss to Jacksonville he caught zero passes and returned one punt for five yards. Could be that he doesn't know or quite feel comfortable in the offense quite yet but his first game not in a Bengal uniform was uneventful. Quote
Stripes Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 I don't think he mad many opportunities to catch the ball. I may be wrong, but isn't he third or fourth on the depth chart? Quote
Stripes Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 Yeah... he kinda sucks. Thanks for your input. Quote
Humanzee 5000 Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 Most importantly though. We were all lead to believe that he was injured. He doesn't seem unhealthy right now. It was either genious on Marvin's part to make teams in our division not want him, or he just hasn't shown the signs of long term injury yet! Quote
HoosierCat Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 I don't think he mad many opportunities to catch the ball. I may be wrong, but isn't he third or fourth on the depth chart? Fifth. They signed him primarily as a punt returner, tho I wouldn't be surprised if he works his way up the chain once he has time to absorb the playbook and get comfy with the offense.As for the injury, it was never alleged to be somthing that would knock him out now, but was supposedly a "degenerative condition" simila to arthritis. It would reportedly shorten his career, but playing now would just be a matter of dealing with the pain. Of course, that was all Lapham-fueled rumor, so take it FWIW. Quote
jjakq27 Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 Yeah... he kinda sucks. Yeah, I forgot, you guys have the Frismanian Devil or whatever his name is. Quote
bengal4life4show Posted September 13, 2005 Report Posted September 13, 2005 I also think when warrick learns their plays he will play better there then here. He will be in a division, and a conference for that matter that doesnt play good D. He will catch 6yrd screens and take them to the house. I miss that guy. Quote
John Stofa Posted September 14, 2005 Report Posted September 14, 2005 He hasn't been there nearly long enough yet to know their offense. That's why he's well down the depth chart and why he had zero catches in their first game. He'll be fine. Quote
redsbengalsbucks Posted September 14, 2005 Report Posted September 14, 2005 Engram is better at being Warrick than Warrick ever was, unless Engram gets injured Warrick will never be more than a #3 or #4 WR Quote
kingwilly Posted September 15, 2005 Report Posted September 15, 2005 Per KFFL:Mike Sando, of the Tacoma News Tribune, reports the Seattle Seahawks have plans for WR Peter Warrick to become more involved on offense in Week 2. Warrick played a special teams role in Week 1.It will take him some time but he will probaboly contribute as the year goes on.Best of luick to you PDub... Quote
Stripes Posted September 15, 2005 Report Posted September 15, 2005 I have a gut feeling Warrick is going to have good year. Nothing that will send fantasy owners to the waiver wire drooling and rabid, but solid. He certainly will impress his coaches out there when the ball actually stays within his grasp after it gets to him! Quote
bengalindian Posted September 15, 2005 Report Posted September 15, 2005 Yeah... he kinda sucks.Yeah, I forgot, you guys have the Frismanian Devil or whatever his name is. That reminds me. Chris Berman SUCKS. At everything. Quote
HairOnFire Posted September 19, 2005 Report Posted September 19, 2005 Bump. Two punt returns this week that gained five yards. No catches. I watched a couple of minutes of their game and looked for Warrick when they went 4-wide. Nope. Quote
dave Posted October 2, 2005 Report Posted October 2, 2005 Warrick update -- 1 catch for 42 yards last week, no significant punt returns. Questionable with a bad groin this week and I don't think he played. Any more complaints about his getting cut? Quote
Stripes Posted October 5, 2005 Report Posted October 5, 2005 Warrick update -- 1 catch for 42 yards last week, no significant punt returns. Questionable with a bad groin this week and I don't think he played. Any more complaints about his getting cut? I hope P-dub gets some more opportunities out there... He's better than a "1 catch for 42 yards last week, no significant punt returns" type player! Quote
AMC Posted October 5, 2005 Report Posted October 5, 2005 Warrick update -- 1 catch for 42 yards last week, no significant punt returns. Questionable with a bad groin this week and I don't think he played. Any more complaints about his getting cut? I hope P-dub gets some more opportunities out there... He's better than a "1 catch for 42 yards last week, no significant punt returns" type player!He is washed up.....Marvin knew it after last year, but he gave him the benfit of the doubt.... Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted October 5, 2005 Report Posted October 5, 2005 We'll see I guess, looks like he'll be a starter Sunday, at worst a #3, with Jackson and Engram out.He has what, one 42 yard catch so far? I'm suprised they haven't tried to work him into the mix more yet. Quote
Ox Posted October 6, 2005 Report Posted October 6, 2005 Since I have DJ in my fantasy league, I might pick up PDub for a spot start this week. Hope he does something. Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted October 17, 2005 Report Posted October 17, 2005 Warrick was the leading WR for the Seahags tonight, 3 for 53. Quote
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted October 17, 2005 Report Posted October 17, 2005 Warrick was the leading WR for the Seahags tonight, 3 for 53.Boy, I'm glad we cut him. Walter had that on one drive.... Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted October 17, 2005 Report Posted October 17, 2005 I thought Warrick looked pretty good. I am not bashing the Bengals for cutting him, but hardly think he's finished. Quote
HoosierCat Posted October 17, 2005 Report Posted October 17, 2005 Warrick looked good. They only threw at him a few times but he caught everything, including one over the middle where he was hit by two guys as he caught the ball, and one little toss after which he juked a guy and picked up about 20 more yards. And he was on the field most of the game, he just was used mostly as a downfield blocker for Allexander. Threw a couple key blocks I saw. Good for p-dub. Quote
skyline Posted October 17, 2005 Report Posted October 17, 2005 Warrick looked good. They only threw at him a few times but he caught everything, including one over the middle where he was hit by two guys as he caught the ball, and one little toss after which he juked a guy and picked up about 20 more yards. And he was on the field most of the game, he just was used mostly as a downfield blocker for Allexander. Threw a couple key blocks I saw. Good for p-dub. Yep, I'm pulling for the guy to do well... Quote
ShulaSteakhouse Posted October 17, 2005 Report Posted October 17, 2005 Could Warrick come back to haunt the Bengals in the Superbowl in January? hahahaha. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.