turningpoint Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Obviously The Vikings want to trade the guy....would u be happy if we parted with our 1st round pick and Peter Warrick/ or a defensive player of some sorts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABengalsFan09 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Rather have Warrick and the pick.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 He would be a negative, not a positive for the team. We got rid of the cancer, why would we want to have him cause problems for us? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottishbengal Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 didn't the bengals have the opportunity to pick this guy i the draft, but passed due to his potential problems - eg drugs, attitude, or something? I stand to be wholly corrected if this is not the case, just thought there was some memory in the back of my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Bengal Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 didn't the bengals have the opportunity to pick this guy i the draft, but passed due to his potential problems - eg drugs, attitude, or something? I stand to be wholly corrected if this is not the case, just thought there was some memory in the back of my mind. That was the year where they had TWO first round picks, and passed on him tweece. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turningpoint Posted February 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 He would be a negative, not a positive for the team. We got rid of the cancer, why would we want to have him cause problems for us? lol he may have a negative attitude, but I think Chad and him would get a long really well, and I know Marvin could do a great job with him.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turningpoint Posted February 12, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 didn't the bengals have the opportunity to pick this guy i the draft, but passed due to his potential problems - eg drugs, attitude, or something? I stand to be wholly corrected if this is not the case, just thought there was some memory in the back of my mind.That was the year where they had TWO first round picks, and passed on him tweece. yeah but we did draft 2 great LB's in Spikes and Simmons. Spikes is a beast despite being on another team..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delhole Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Ahhh the Mcnabb and Moss combination we could have right now would be unstoppable but i'm still happy with Palmer and Johnson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaker Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 The Vikings want to trade their best player. He's goota be a real pain in the ass. We experienced the same thing, had a pain in the ass best player and traded him. Why make someone else's problem your own? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jditty47 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 yes hes worth it. look what TO did for the eagles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Stripes Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 f'ck moss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BersMrnsT Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 You guys are really underestimating what the Vikings want for Moss. It's not like they have to trade the guy. They'll only give him up if they feel the compensation is enough, and they're looking for Lawrence Welk type compensation. I'm too young to know who Lawrence Welk is, but I'm guessing that whatever team traded for him gave up a lot. ESPN listed a possible trade in which the Redskins give the Vikings LaVar Arrington, the #9, and the Redskins #2 pick, and the Vikings might find this a little more appealing than Peter Warrick and #17. Basically, whether Moss would be good in Cincy or not, it's not worth it to give up multiple picks and one of our best players (Brian Simmons most likely) when we could easily get a very productive #2 WR in the draft or FA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrandom42 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 I can just imagine Randy telling Marvin, "I'll play hard when and where I feel like it and if you don't like it, that's not MY problem. If I don't get at least 25 plays a game run just for me, I'll just tweak my ankle and sit out the season! I don't block, and I don't play decoy for anyone! The owner is paying ME the big bucks and that means I'm bigger and better than you or any other coach in this league, and don't you forget it! I do it MY way or you're out of here!"And if Marvin can win Randy over to being a team player after that, he should be unanimously voted Coach of the Year, no arguement from anyone else! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTBengalsFan Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Marvin would NEVER get Randy Moss, ever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 didn't the bengals have the opportunity to pick this guy i the draft, but passed due to his potential problems - eg drugs, attitude, or something? I stand to be wholly corrected if this is not the case, just thought there was some memory in the back of my mind.That was the year where they had TWO first round picks, and passed on him tweece. yeah but we did draft 2 great LB's in Spikes and Simmons. Spikes is a beast despite being on another team..... I hope you are right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 NO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 I have zero respect for him as a person or a player.So no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 He would be a negative, not a positive for the team. We got rid of the cancer, why would we want to have him cause problems for us? Exactly! Corey had his dark side, but Moss is the king of the darkness! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWillams40 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 Moss is a little punk, i dont want him on my team espcially how much he is going to cost to get him, let the ravens blow picks and players on him and fight with ray ray, we got chad and pdub Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesbrooks21 Posted February 12, 2005 Report Share Posted February 12, 2005 id take him........just think of the matchup problems with moss lined up with chad. we would be more explosive than the colts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.