TJJackson Posted February 6, 2013 Report Posted February 6, 2013 link: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20130206/frostee-rucker-browns-released.ap/?eref=sircrcAll of you who felt we just had to have this guy in our DL rotation and was a huge loss last offseason - well, he's a street FA now. Do we re-sign him?My feeling: oh hell no Quote
BengalszoneBilly Posted February 6, 2013 Report Posted February 6, 2013 link: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/nfl/news/20130206/frostee-rucker-browns-released.ap/?eref=sircrcAll of you who felt we just had to have this guy in our DL rotation and was a huge loss last offseason - well, he's a street FA now. Do we re-sign him?My feeling: oh hell noYour feeling is right. You don't sign cast offs out of Cleveland. Quote
HoosierCat Posted February 6, 2013 Report Posted February 6, 2013 I wouldn't mind having Rucker back at all. Quote
skyline Posted February 6, 2013 Report Posted February 6, 2013 He performed well while he was here. and if he comes on the cheap...You really wonder about his health, though...wasn't he having a lot of knee problems? Quote
bwillycuse Posted February 6, 2013 Report Posted February 6, 2013 He played in every game for the browns. Cut because they are going to a 3-4. He was due a roster bonus soon. Like 3 million. He had a good season. Quote
ArmyBengal Posted February 7, 2013 Report Posted February 7, 2013 Yep, cut due to scheme change.Can't say as I would mind him really.When he was healthy, he played well. Quote
membengal Posted February 7, 2013 Report Posted February 7, 2013 I would like to have him back, but at a fraction of that insane contract Cleveland signed him for. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.