Jump to content

Crazy Talk: Should the Bengals Tag Nelson?


HoosierCat

  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Franchise Reggie Nelson?

    • Yea
      2
    • Nay
      10


Recommended Posts

Well this makes no sense at all I just don't understand this team sometimes! Just because they went 9-7 dosnt mean they were all that great, and with a lot of holes FA could have filled a couple spots. I like building through the draft, but there way to many holes, plus they hardly ever keep there guys. Guess will see what happens but it just dosnt make sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

And when there are no sell outs next season, minus Pittsburgh, they have no one to blame but themselves.

Stop saying the fans need to start supporting the team more and how they should be ashamed.

This is a f*cking joke...

Yup,

The ball is in your court Mikey. Show us you are in it to win it. The message will be loud and clear to fans and players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Reedy is just joe smoe who makes alot of assumptions, he is actually quite Hobson-esque in his articles. No one knows whats going to happen, I wouldn't expect anything over the top but I think there wll be at least one semi-splash in free agency (Brandon Carr/ Tracey Porter-ish).

Given that Reedy is basing his stuff on what Marvin is saying, I'm inclined to think he's on the right track.

Brandon Carr is going to get paid top dollar. The Bengals aren't going to be active at that level. Porter I could see, He's more of a second-tier FA and both the CB FA market and the draft are corner-heavy, so beyond the top couple of guys prices should come down significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just sad though. More money under the cap than ever before, nice draft picks in the first two rounds, and able to fill holes freeing up the draft for BPA. Then we are told we wouldn't be seeing much because they are worried about a contract they might have to be concerned with 3 years from now. To bad we don't have more high profile guys that don't want to play for us and we can trade for more picks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be half as irked by the "save for the future" strategy if I had any faith that they will actually be signing guys.

I mean, looking ahead, the Bengals have a point. Within the next few years they are looking at extending:

AJ Green

Andy Dalton

Geno Atkins

Carlos Dunlap

Jermaine Gresham

Rey Maualga (assuming he gets his head screwed on straight)

And there's also Moobs, who will need a big $$$ deal to keep after this season if he continues to improve.

So yeah, the future needs to be taken into account. The problem is, based on what's gone before, half or more of these guys will walk because the Bengals deem them "not worth it," i.e. not worth what they can get on the open market. And so the perpetual rebuild continues, and money that could have been used this year gets saved for a future use that never happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who were interested in LaRon Landry, the Bengals are not among his reported suitors: Jets, Iggles, Lions & Pats.


/>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/14/laron-landry-has-four-suitors/

The Jets are also said to be interested in Nelson as well as Brandon Meriweather.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears a bidding war is breaking out over Reggie. He has an offer from the Jets and Reedy says the Bengals are still in play. Per Reggie's agent a third team has also expressed interest.


/>http://www.cincyjungle.com/2012/3/17/2880776/2012-nfl-free-agency-jets-have-made-an-offer-to-reggie-nelson-nelson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not unhappy, I just didn't get all the hand-wringing. Feels like some of you have built him up in your minds to be something I don't think he is. Regardless, I like having some continuity back there, so glad he is back. Still not bothered they didn't franchise him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not unhappy, I just didn't get all the hand-wringing. Feels like some of you have built him up in your minds to be something I don't think he is. Regardless, I like having some continuity back there, so glad he is back. Still not bothered they didn't franchise him.

What better option is there for Free Safety though? move Crocker back? Draft? where we have bigger holes he's not probowler by any means but atleast a solid contributor and a Zimmer guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not unhappy, I just didn't get all the hand-wringing. Feels like some of you have built him up in your minds to be something I don't think he is. Regardless, I like having some continuity back there, so glad he is back. Still not bothered they didn't franchise him.

What better option is there for Free Safety though? move Crocker back? Draft? where we have bigger holes he's not probowler by any means but atleast a solid contributor and a Zimmer guy.

Nelson played like a pro bowler last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said I wasn't unhappy. I just thought the incessant and over-the-top bitching over not franchise tagging a guy with massive holes in his game was weird. I hope Reggie keeps getting better. I hope he fills in some of those holes - I think he can. But the cliff-diving over "what if" we lost him was odd to me. If we lost him, we would have filled in. This wasn't exactly like possibly losing Ed Reed in his prime...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've said all along the reason for tagging him wouldn't have been because he was our best player, because he wasn't.

It would have simply allowed the team to keep some continuity when there was no other option out there that presented an upgrade.

It also allows the team to not have to get another starter in the draft.

If you were one of the ones who was comfortable with what we have on the roster starting had Nelson left, that's fine. I just disagree.

This is a good move for many reasons, but agree that one of those reasons isn't because he's the best player.

At the same time, I think it's silly to say he didn't perform well last season either.

The cap hit is surely going to be less than the tag, so this is win win for the Bengals.

GET MICHAEL BUSH !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...