walzav29 Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 I know he didn't start, but after my shell shock wore off I was sure I seen him out there. How did he do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 As expected the Bengals attempted to ease Smith into the action as the extra blocker in heavy packages. Nothing I watched stood out, good or bad, and game circumstances dictated he get very few snaps in the 2nd half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spor_tees Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 As expected the Bengals attempted to ease Smith into the action as the extra blocker in heavy packages. Nothing I watched stood out, good or bad, and game circumstances dictated he get very few snaps in the 2nd half.I believe his stomach stood out very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 As expected the Bengals attempted to ease Smith into the action as the extra blocker in heavy packages. Nothing I watched stood out, good or bad, and game circumstances dictated he get very few snaps in the 2nd half.I believe his stomach stood out very well.yes him and bobby have huge guts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 Whe should cut ties with him after this season and look for his replacement in the draft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 Whe should cut ties with him after this season and look for his replacement in the draftCorrection, you must have gotten run over by the short bus on the way to GM school. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 Whe should cut ties with him after this season and look for his replacement in the draftCorrection, you must have gotten run over by the short bus on the way to GM school. Well, he's right about one thing. One of the things the Bengals fought for during the holdout was an out clause after 2 years. Pretty sure there's a large roster bonus to factor in as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 Reedy says Smith played 10 snaps total. 9/15/10: Playing time — Patriots gamePosted by jreedy September 15th, 2010, 6:27 am We're going to try something new this year and provide snap count totals and other stats from games this year. On most weeks, we hope to have it up on Tuesday, but due to travel delays on Monday I wasn't able to go through the tape of Sunday's game until yesterday. Snap totals are unofficial since it was taken off the TV broadcast.Offense (76 snaps)QB: Carson Palmer 76RB: Cedric Benson 41, Bernard Scott 35FB: Domata Peko 2, Dan Skuta 1TE: Reggie Kelly 18, Jermaine Gresham 66, Dan Coats 8WR: Chad Ochocinco 72, Terrell Owens 73, Jordan Shipley 58, Quan Cosby 2, Jerome Simpson 1.OL: Andrew Whitworth 76, Nate Livings 76, Kyle Cook 76, Bobbie Williams 76, Dennis Roland 72, Andre Smith 10Unofficially I have them in two tight-end sets on 13 plays.Cedric Benson's greatest running lanes were behind left tackle, where he had 6 carries for 35 yards. Everywhere else had a combined 9 carries for 8 yards.Only one infraction on the penalty report — Dennis Roland for a false start in the third quarter. Hence officially no drives stalled due to penalties.Red zone: Bengals were 2 of 2 and also 2 of 2 in goal-to-go efficiency.(Click the link for the entire article)/>http://cincinnati.co...-patriots-game/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 Whe should cut ties with him after this season and look for his replacement in the draftCorrection, you must have gotten run over by the short bus on the way to GM school.How could the "short bus" run him over when he was riding in it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 Whe should cut ties with him after this season and look for his replacement in the draftWow that would be Retarded,Give him this season to become RT he's suppossed to be worst case they can draft a tackle next year and move him to guard "shrug" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted September 15, 2010 Report Share Posted September 15, 2010 OL: Andrew Whitworth 76, Nate Livings 76, Kyle Cook 76, Bobbie Williams 76, Dennis Roland 72, Andre Smith 10Not one play by Mathis yet some think his play was bad as livings...Wish I had what they were smoking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 For the record, I've never said the "play" of either Mathis or Livings was bad.I simply said, THEY were bad.That is part of the roster that needs upgraded badly... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 For the record, I've never said the "play" of either Mathis or Livings was bad.I simply said, THEY were bad.That is part of the roster that needs upgraded badly...Maybe thats so, but last year when Mathis was in there he played much better then Livings. How could you tell anything the Bengals were playing musical o-linemen, so how could either one of them get into a rythem. To me Mathis is the better choice and Marvin is stupid not to see that. Then again i guess im not the coach, just a fan who wants to see the best set of linemen in the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 For the record, I've never said the "play" of either Mathis or Livings was bad.I simply said, THEY were bad.That is part of the roster that needs upgraded badly... you said something about not noticing him doesn't mean it was a good thing even though he never was put in the game...I wanna see better play out position too but I'd like to see Mathis get a Fair shot because IMO He was a good player for us last year...there could be a legit reason why he's not playing but I just don't trust Paul Alexander and would like to see it for my own eyes "shrug" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 For the record, I've never said the "play" of either Mathis or Livings was bad.I simply said, THEY were bad.That is part of the roster that needs upgraded badly...Maybe thats so, but last year when Mathis was in there he played much better then Livings. How could you tell anything the Bengals were playing musical o-linemen, so how could either one of them get into a rythem. To me Mathis is the better choice and Marvin is stupid not to see that. Then again i guess im not the coach, just a fan who wants to see the best set of linemen in the game.I suppose, I just want to see the best set of linemen we have in the game as well.I'm also of the mindset that when the season is over, there are better to be found. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 I suppose, I just want to see the best set of linemen we have in the game as well.I'm also of the mindset that when the season is over, there are better to be found.Mathis Was rated 6th best Guard in football last year ,There was a few articles about him being underrated...I'm all for upgrading our Oline I just can't understand paul alexander's mindset sometimes "Cough Stacey Andrews being the best tackle in football"...It looks like alexander won't even consider Mathis Starting now because he's seen as the ultimate backup one guy who can backup 4-5 positions >< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 For the record, I've never said the "play" of either Mathis or Livings was bad.I simply said, THEY were bad.That is part of the roster that needs upgraded badly...Maybe thats so, but last year when Mathis was in there he played much better then Livings. How could you tell anything the Bengals were playing musical o-linemen, so how could either one of them get into a rythem. To me Mathis is the better choice and Marvin is stupid not to see that. Then again i guess im not the coach, just a fan who wants to see the best set of linemen in the game.I suppose, I just want to see the best set of linemen we have in the game as well.I'm also of the mindset that when the season is over, there are better to be found.Oh i agree im sure there are much better, but this what we have here, and i wanna see Mathis get a shot. I didnt like Livings last year, and i dont like him now. He makes way to many penalties, and gets beat so bad. Now if Livings improves then awsome, but i think the better Guard on the team is sitting on the bench. I am however happy that they stopped thats stupid musical o-linemen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Oh i agree im sure there are much better, but this what we have here, and i wanna see Mathis get a shot. I didnt like Livings last year,True that,The guy is suppossed be the mauler but doesn't look he has any strength at all...Atleast Mathis is Athletic enough to make plays to spring benson by far our best pulling linemen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Again, I'm all about getting the best guy in there and if that guy is Mathis right now, then get his ass in there.All I'm saying is, don't say the guy is something he obviously isn't. I'm not trying to be funny here, but what is the reason, the better guy isn't playing ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volcom69 Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Again, I'm all about getting the best guy in there and if that guy is Mathis right now, then get his ass in there.All I'm saying is, don't say the guy is something he obviously isn't. I'm not trying to be funny here, but what is the reason, the better guy isn't playing ??I am by far not a football genius, or by far an offensive line coach. Im just going by what i saw last year, when Mathis was in there he was much better at pass blocking, and much faster and could be a nice pulling Guard when need be. This year they were making Mathis play all the postions in the preseason, which i thought was good for him. He has more experience, he was very good when he played in Carolina, but he got hurt, and well thats how he ended up here. Im just going by what i saw, so i guess Marvin and Paul see it different, and thats why there the coach and im just a fan. Just my thought on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Play this dude at G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Play this dude at G/>http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j141/ECKoolAid/lolsports/andre-smith-has-titties.jpgI'm kinda torn between laughing and crying. I think I'm leaning a little toward the tears, thoEither way, I *was* looking forward to dinner, but the appetite is now gone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 I think he'd be a great guard, superior,.. Like, all pro, but he's staying at RT,.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 I think he'd be a great guard, superior,.. Like, all pro, but he's staying at RT,..His biggest problem appears to be that he doesn't have the type of drive necessary to be superior at anything. If he had that, he'd be a superior all-pro RT too. I mean, he's got the physical tools. That's why he was drafted at #6 overall.If he turns out to be a bust, perhaps they could protect him from speed rushers by bumping him inside... but at the price he's getting paid, I'd bet he just gets cut outright if he doesn't get his act together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Unfortunately I can only think of the Hard Knocks segments about him, especially the talent show skit.I hope he pans out but I really think they missed badly on him. Not sure how that was possible considering all of the negative pub he received prior to the draft. Much of it appears to be well founded. I'm tired of drafting guys with upside. Should have taken Michael Oher. He may not be the run blocker that Smith is but he was a pro-ready player from day one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.