walzav29 Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 It seems to me the value is the same in the 2nd as the 1st. If a guy like Taylor Mays is available at 21 is there you take him. Or the DT out of Tennessee. This is the trickiest draft I remember for Cincy. I think the D can get even better and needs to for next seasons crazy schedule. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 No joke. I was 45 minutes late for work today because I was waiting for Taylor Mays to run his 40. And it was worth it, just to hear Mike Mayock eat a plate full of crow. Quote
walzav29 Posted March 2, 2010 Author Report Posted March 2, 2010 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/02/safety-dance-in-april-will-be-interesting/I like this guy, but I don't know if he'll drop to 21. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 />http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/02/safety-dance-in-april-will-be-interesting/ Thanks for the update, but I already knew about the official time being bumped. In short, to me it doesn't matter which number you pick because all of 'em, official or unofficial, are smoking fast for a 230 lb player. Better, he's been consistently clocked in the 4.3s, and lower, when running at USC....as he will on his Pro Day. And best, he was smooth as silk in all of the drills. Quote
Kazkal Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Indeed the guy ia A BEaSt at 6'3 230 lba he runs faster then people 20-40 lbs less then him Quote
JoePong Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead... Quote
cincyhokie Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...No, I think he was asking the question not proposing it. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...No, I think he was asking the question not proposing it. Reading comprehension isn't one of Joe Pong's strengths. That said, if you need someone to ignorantly say the word "stupid" over and over again he's very clearly the guy you want. Quote
kingwilly Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...No, I think he was asking the question not proposing it. Reading comprehension isn't one of Joe Pong's strengths. That said, if you need someone to ignorantly say the word "stupid" over and over again he's very clearly the guy you want.The JoePong Business Plan1. Score more points.2. Win more games.3. ????????4. ProfitNADS Quote
CJBestInAFC Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 />http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/02/safety-dance-in-april-will-be-interesting/I like this guy, but I don't know if he'll drop to 21.I hope he is there when the Bengals pick. Imagine Hines Ward as the wr. in this video:/>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv2iN4bUeVM Quote
JoePong Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...No, I think he was asking the question not proposing it. Reading comprehension isn't one of Joe Pong's strengths. That said, if you need someone to ignorantly say the word "stupid" over and over again he's very clearly the guy you want.I know he was asking the question. That's exactly my point. He didn't state that we shouldn't lock onto a WR. I was waiting for his answer. Seems kind of random and doesn't make sense. I think I'll start a thread titled, "Why lock on a kicker in the 1st round?" and then not give any answers or reasons. Quote
Stripes Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 I know he was asking the question. That's exactly my point. He didn't state that we shouldn't lock onto a WR. I was waiting for his answer. Seems kind of random and doesn't make sense. I think I'll start a thread titled, "Why lock on a kicker in the 1st round?" and then not give any answers or reasons.Will you just stop it, Pong? He did answer it immediately within the first sentence. He views the second round prospects as generally equal in value to those in the first, so "why lock on one in the first?"Crikey, you're useless. By the way, the Bengals were much better at home than on the road in 2009. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 He did answer it immediately within the first sentence. "Instant gratification takes too long." --- Carrie Fisher Quote
walzav29 Posted March 3, 2010 Author Report Posted March 3, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...I'm saying there seems to be a sentiment that the Bengals have to take a WR or a TE in the 1st round. I'm saying that shouldn't be the case. I think there may be an impact defensive player at the 21st pick and the Bengals can get the same value for a WR at 21 as they can in the 2nd rnd. Does that make it any clearer? Quote
Ickey44 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 Does that make it any clearer?Probably not. Keep in mind who you're addressing. Quote
derekshank Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...No, I think he was asking the question not proposing it. Reading comprehension isn't one of Joe Pong's strengths. That said, if you need someone to ignorantly say the word "stupid" over and over again he's very clearly the guy you want.The JoePong Business Plan1. Score more points.2. Win more games.3. ????????4. ProfitNADSIsn't that more or less a joke from an episode of Southpark? Quote
Wraith Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 If your going to spend a first round selection on a WR you would be better off trading for Brandon Marshall who is a sure thing rather than a rookie who isn't. Quote
cincyhokie Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 Are you going to answer your question about why we should lock onto a WR in the 1st round?Personally, i think it's stupid to lock onto one position but go ahead...No, I think he was asking the question not proposing it. Reading comprehension isn't one of Joe Pong's strengths. That said, if you need someone to ignorantly say the word "stupid" over and over again he's very clearly the guy you want.The JoePong Business Plan1. Score more points.2. Win more games.3. ????????4. ProfitNADSIsn't that more or less a joke from an episode of Southpark?Yeah, I think it's the one with the underwear gnomes. Quote
TJJackson Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 ....isn't one of Joe Pong's strengthsJoe Pong has strengths? Quote
Ickey44 Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 ....isn't one of Joe Pong's strengthsJoe Pong has strengths?Well, they're dubious strengths. Like being ignorant, for example. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 3, 2010 Report Posted March 3, 2010 If your going to spend a first round selection on a WR you would be better off trading for Brandon Marshall who is a sure thing rather than a rookie who isn't. The Broncos just placed a 1st round tender on Marshall. No additional 3rd round pick required. So one pick....and about 100 million bucks should do the trick. There's even speculation the Broncos will settle for less. BTW, Sheffler can be had for a 2nd rounder. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.