gregstephens Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 "Dr. Jekyll paging Mr. Hyde. Dr. Jekyll paging Mr. Hyde."http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=6840Or the Bengals' propaganda machine hard at work again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwedge Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 Oh yippie!!! Just proof that this d-bag is skitzo!! I'm beginning to think he is having a problem with Carson... He doesn't seem to want to catch passes from him.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurmanation Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 his group has been the best in the NFL over the last four years for forcing takeaways," he said and a check with Elias Sports Bureau confirms it. Since 2004 the Bengals have generated 146 turnovers, followed by the Bears (140), the Panthers (132), the Colts (130) and the Chargers (129). Cincinnati is the only one of the top five that hasn't been to a conference championship game in that stretch.I like reading that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalByTheBay Posted June 13, 2008 Report Share Posted June 13, 2008 He's happy? Who? HOF? Shula? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 his group has been the best in the NFL over the last four years for forcing takeaways," he said and a check with Elias Sports Bureau confirms it. Since 2004 the Bengals have generated 146 turnovers, followed by the Bears (140), the Panthers (132), the Colts (130) and the Chargers (129). Cincinnati is the only one of the top five that hasn't been to a conference championship game in that stretch.I like reading that.Why? That's actually NOT good, and says a lot about how poorly the team/franchise is run from the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 The thread title reminds me of this:I think the Bengals should deal with Chad in the same manner... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 his group has been the best in the NFL over the last four years for forcing takeaways," he said and a check with Elias Sports Bureau confirms it. Since 2004 the Bengals have generated 146 turnovers, followed by the Bears (140), the Panthers (132), the Colts (130) and the Chargers (129). Cincinnati is the only one of the top five that hasn't been to a conference championship game in that stretch.I like reading that.me too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPimp Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Why? That's actually NOT good, and says a lot about how poorly the team/franchise is run from the top.What do you know about running a team/franchise ? You cant even run a Steakhouse ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Why? That's actually NOT good, and says a lot about how poorly the team/franchise is run from the top.What do you know about running a team/franchise ? You cant even run a Steakhouse ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ox Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Shkitzo i about right describing this guy.They were dogging him bigtime on NFL radio yesterday afternoon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted June 14, 2008 Report Share Posted June 14, 2008 Why? That's actually NOT good, and says a lot about how poorly the team/franchise is run from the top.What do you know about running a team/franchise ? You cant even run a Steakhouse !Answer the question! Leading the league in take-a-ways for 3 years, and having a top 5 QB and WR? And one playoff loss to show for it?? How is that a good thing? How I say! And you wonder why Chad is a nut case?It's because the Bengals skimp on talent/expenses wherever they can, don't have a good personnel GM, if any, and as a result don't know how to plan for consistency!Maddening! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UofLnMU Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I've thought that much of this was merely posturing by Ocho. Rile his fanbase up, and then return for a healthy dose of redemption. If it were anyone other, I would never presume such calculation, but hell, with Chad, why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted June 17, 2008 Report Share Posted June 17, 2008 I've thought that much of this was merely posturing by Ocho. Rile his fanbase up, and then return for a healthy dose of redemption. If it were anyone other, I would never presume such calculation, but hell, with Chad, why not?Only other guy in the league that calculating is TO. Which makes me wonder if Rosenwhore just attracts nutcases, or if he's the guy pulling the strings on these shows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.