CinciCat Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 What do you guys think about the report on 1530 last night about the trade talks that would send CJ and the Bengals #1 to the Rams for Torry Holt and their #1.I don't know... Glenn Dorsey and Torry Holt sound pretty good to me! Quote
Bengals1 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I still have a hard time pictureing SoP trading Chad and leaving all that bonus money to be paid. That's just not a SoP move. Quote
skyline Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I think it's a bogus report, but I'd take it. Dorsey in the first, and a receiver in the 2nd? Quote
agreen_112 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Like I said if Chad has to go, I'm only accepting players that are on his level. Boldin, Holt, Fitsgerald, TO, Moss, Roy Williams, B. Edwards. How old is Holt? Quote
skyline Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Like I said if Chad has to go, I'm only accepting players that are on his level. Boldin, Holt, Fitsgerald, TO, Moss, Roy Williams, B. Edwards. How old is Holt?Holt is 31. Chad is 30, right? Quote
coupdayta Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Trading Chad would be a huge mistake. And how does that trade make any sense for the Rams? Quote
agreen_112 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Trading Chad would be a huge mistake. And how does that trade make any sense for the Rams?The Rams would be getting the better part of the deal, that's what makes sense for the Rams. Chad > Holt. Quote
COB Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 The Rams would be getting the better part of the deal, that's what makes sense for the Rams. Chad > Holt.Well, if you're picking a fantasy team Chad's better than Holt. But we're talking about actual football. The kind in which players face adversity, and have to be accountable for their actions to their teammates and coaches. Chad's production is barely even worth it. Get him out of here. Quote
Spor_tees Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I would make that trade in...1...2...3...DONE! Holt is by far more of a team player than Chad could EVER be. Holt has played beside Isaac Bruce for several years and how many times you heard him bitch and moan? Oh yeah NONE. Man I wish this was true but trades like this never happen.On a side note, there is no #81 on the roster so Holt would fit in just fine! Quote
duus Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I'd take it. Done deal. Here come those dreams again. Quote
Bengals1 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I'd take it. Done deal. Here come those dreams again.I would too but unless or until Chad agrees to pay SoP back the signing bonus money its just not going to happen. Quote
membengal Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I can't imagine a scenario under which the Rams would be that stupid. Quote
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Well, if you're picking a fantasy team Chad's better than Holt. But we're talking about actual football. The kind in which players face adversity, and have to be accountable for their actions to their teammates and coaches. Chad's production is barely even worth it. Get him out of here.Ah, I think the fantasy numbers would flip-flop if they switched teams. Holt is the best route runner in the game. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I can't imagine a scenario under which the Rams would be that stupid. It's probably just another rumor. That said.... Holt has a cronic knee problem. He still puts up excellent numbers, but there are rumblings within the Ram organization that he's not the player he was. And just as in the Chad example, those rumors have become a point of friction between Holt and the Ram front office. As for the Rams willingness to swap picks, I'd say there greatest need by far was at OT...a position they can very easily address at #9. Quote
skyline Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 I can't imagine a scenario under which the Rams would be that stupid.It's probably just another rumor. That said....Holt has a cronic knee problem. He still puts up excellent numbers, but there are rumblings within the Ram organization that he's not the player he was. And just as in the Chad example, those rumors have become a point of friction between Holt and the Ram front office. As for the Rams willingness to swap picks, I'd say there greatest need by far was at OT...a position they can very easily address at #9. Unless they really have their hopes set on getting Long. If he's gone before they pick, though, then I can see a trade happening to move down. Quote
DesperateDerelict Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 OK - so, with the 2nd pick of the 2008 the Cincinnati Bengals select ???????????? Quote
Spor_tees Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 OK - so, with the 2nd pick of the 2008 the Cincinnati Bengals select ????????????Vernon Gholston DE from...THEE Ohio State University....I think he would be better than Chris Long would be for the Bengals. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 OK - so, with the 2nd pick of the 2008 the Cincinnati Bengals select ???????????? Keith Rivers. Under the above scenario I'd have to assume the Bengals would select Dorsey. Quote
agreen_112 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 OK - so, with the 2nd pick of the 2008 the Cincinnati Bengals select ????????????Dorsey Quote
DesperateDerelict Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 OK - so, with the 2nd pick of the 2008 the Cincinnati Bengals select ????????????DorseyI think I gotta go Gholston or Chris Long - more flexibility. Quote
bengalsfansince68 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Like I said if Chad has to go, I'm only accepting players that are on his level. Boldin, Holt, Fitsgerald, TO, Moss, Roy Williams, B. Edwards. How old is Holt?Wow, Is that the first ever acknowledgement from Green of the possibility of letting his man-love take his tired act elsewhere?Am I the only one who noticed that? Quote
bengalsfansince68 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Once again gentlemen, we have several guys conjecturing all over the joint about something that very likely won't happen. Will ya'al never learn? Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Once again gentlemen, we have several guys conjecturing all over the joint about something that very likely won't happen. Will ya'al never learn? And there you go again...blathering on with your opinion about what other people should and shouldn't be talking about. What's up with that? Quote
bengalsfansince68 Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 And there you go again...blathering on with your opinion about what other people should and shouldn't be talking about. What's up with that?Never said anything about what anyone should or should not be talking about. What I do say is that all of the conjecture in the world adds up to nothing. Conjecture about something that likely will never happen adds up to less than nothing.If you enjoy discussing less than nothing, be the guest of the board. Quote
skyline Posted March 7, 2008 Report Posted March 7, 2008 Once again gentlemen, we have several guys conjecturing all over the joint about something that very likely won't happen. Will ya'al never learn?Unlike some of the other threads about trading Chad, I don't think anyone in this thread seriously thought it was a possibility. I do find it interesting to see how many more fans are open to the idea. Even agreen used the word "if", which is a miracle all in itself. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.