The PatternMaster Posted May 15, 2007 Report Share Posted May 15, 2007 wee willy woofter the poofter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelerFan87 Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 Meh, I'm not a big fan of this mascot crap. But, at least our mascot won't be named after the 3rd Hussein brother. (Uday, Qusay, Whodey for those of you unable to figure it out) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The PatternMaster Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Meh, I'm not a big fan of this mascot crap. But, at least our mascot won't be named after the 3rd Hussein brother. (Uday, Qusay, Whodey for those of you unable to figure it out) Just a bit of advice, if you have to explain a joke then it's not funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted May 18, 2007 Report Share Posted May 18, 2007 Meh, I'm not a big fan of this mascot crap. But, at least our mascot won't be named after the 3rd Hussein brother. (Uday, Qusay, Whodey for those of you unable to figure it out) Just a bit of advice, if you have to explain a joke then it's not funny.No doubt. SF87 has said many things that are truly funny, others that show good football sense, many that prove him being a Urine fan through and through, and at times respectful that this is a Bengals message board ... but this one is, well, dumb. Was that really a joke? Heck, I've heard many arguments about how the Who-Dey thing is ridiculous, uneducated, silly, etc ... and I can see merit in many of them ... but '3rd Hussein brother'? Come on SF87, I think I have read enough from you over the last year to know that you can do much better than this! I told you this Pissburgh air quality would eventually mess up your brain. Seriously, you need much less time hanging around those Urine fans on the trolley, and more time reading BengalsZone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelerFan87 Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 Meh, I'm not a big fan of this mascot crap. But, at least our mascot won't be named after the 3rd Hussein brother. (Uday, Qusay, Whodey for those of you unable to figure it out) Just a bit of advice, if you have to explain a joke then it's not funny.Well, normally I wouldn't have explained it, but I was afraid some of the less intellectually blessed members here might not get the reference.others that show good football senseWhat's this? A compliment? Why duus, I'm shocked. Thank you!But come on, say it out loud "Uday, Qusay, and Whodey". You don't think that's funny? Jeez, tought crowd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 others that show good football senseBut come on, say it out loud "Uday, Qusay, and Whodey". You don't think that's funny? Jeez, tought crowd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelers5X Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 Yep, I have to agree with all the Bungle fans. The Steeler mascot is gay as hell, no doubt about it. But I don't really care about mascots, they don't win Super Bowls. Come to think of it, neither do cheerleaders! So knock the organization all you want, but.......BOTTOM LINE IS CINCINNATI DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ONE TITLE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA! (If you guys get a mascot maybe you can use those for names). Or how about 0 for 2.WIN THE BIG ONE THEN MAYBE YOU LOSERS CAN RUN YOUR MOUTHS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The PatternMaster Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 Yep, I have to agree with all the Bungle fans. The Steeler mascot is gay as hell, no doubt about it. But I don't really care about mascots, they don't win Super Bowls. Come to think of it, neither do cheerleaders! So knock the organization all you want, but.......BOTTOM LINE IS CINCINNATI DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ONE TITLE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA! (If you guys get a mascot maybe you can use those for names). Or how about 0 for 2.WIN THE BIG ONE THEN MAYBE YOU LOSERS CAN RUN YOUR MOUTHS!NEW YORK, NY -- The NFL is looking into reports that a Pittsburgh Steelers doctor was on the customer list of a Florida pharmacy whose owners have been indicted by a grand jury in Albany, New York. But it's nothing far from the ordinary.League spokesman Greg Aiello says the league routinely checks out reports about activities with drugs or other substances that involve N-F-L personnel.Records show the doctor purchased about 150-thousand dollars worth of testosterone and human growth hormone and put it on his personal credit card.What was that you were saying? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dez0923 Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 How about "Iwhoant Ceeohate" because there is no way this atrocity will make it to the end of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The PatternMaster Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 I like Wee Willy Woofter the Poofter, it has an international ring to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenyon1977 Posted August 6, 2007 Report Share Posted August 6, 2007 CAPTAIN POO_FACE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Yep, I have to agree with all the Bungle fans. The Steeler mascot is gay as hell, no doubt about it. But I don't really care about mascots, they don't win Super Bowls. Come to think of it, neither do cheerleaders! So knock the organization all you want, but.......BOTTOM LINE IS CINCINNATI DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ONE TITLE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA! (If you guys get a mascot maybe you can use those for names). Or how about 0 for 2.WIN THE BIG ONE THEN MAYBE YOU LOSERS CAN RUN YOUR MOUTHS!Just like Joey Porter I guess....BTW, welcome to Bengalszone! Which one are you, so we can put a name with a face?Maybe the mascot should be the little kid named "Seven". With that name he's kind of ruined for life now so at least he will be able to contribute something to society. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenyon1977 Posted August 7, 2007 Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 "Maybe the mascot should be the little kid named "Seven". With that name he's kind of ruined for life now so at least he will be able to contribute something to society."Yeah he can ruin your franchise just like he did on "Married With Children" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted August 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted August 7, 2007 Ahhh...it's the thread that keeps on giving. Anyhow, how about...Rivet McManwelder?Steel Helmethammer?Chin Spoogedrippinton?Harry Nippleovich? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengal4life Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Yep, I have to agree with all the Bungle fans. The Steeler mascot is gay as hell, no doubt about it. But I don't really care about mascots, they don't win Super Bowls. Come to think of it, neither do cheerleaders! So knock the organization all you want, but.......BOTTOM LINE IS CINCINNATI DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ONE TITLE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA! (If you guys get a mascot maybe you can use those for names). Or how about 0 for 2.WIN THE BIG ONE THEN MAYBE YOU LOSERS CAN RUN YOUR MOUTHS!Super bowl wins.1*,2*,3*,4*,5*Some of those wins could have been without the use of roids but we'll probably never know.Roidie McRoiderton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Yep, I have to agree with all the Bungle fans. The Steeler mascot is gay as hell, no doubt about it. But I don't really care about mascots, they don't win Super Bowls. Come to think of it, neither do cheerleaders! So knock the organization all you want, but.......BOTTOM LINE IS CINCINNATI DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ONE TITLE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA! (If you guys get a mascot maybe you can use those for names). Or how about 0 for 2.WIN THE BIG ONE THEN MAYBE YOU LOSERS CAN RUN YOUR MOUTHS!Super bowl wins.1*,2*,3*,4*,5*Some of those wins could have been without the use of roids but we'll probably never know.Roidie McRoidertonFunny you bring this up. I'm hoping to make it to the doubleheader in Pissburgh next Monday against the Giants. I figure there will be plenty of folks there with their 'asterisk' message, so I'm working on a big board that says:THE IMPACT OF STEROIDSBonds 2007 *Steelers 1975 *, 1976 *, 1978 *, 1979 *I'm still working on the message, but that is the idea. Boy, would I have a good time with that! The point is that I just want folks to be consistent. It is amazing to me how Pissburghers love to put an asterisk by Bonds because of steroids, but how dare anyone make the exact same argument about the 70s Steelers. Yet it is a well-known fact (i.e. players on those teams later admitted usage) that they were 'ahead of the game' in terms of using this drug. If Bonds had an unfair advantage, and if records matter, then the same set of rules should be applied to the champions of the 70s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The PatternMaster Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Yep, I have to agree with all the Bungle fans. The Steeler mascot is gay as hell, no doubt about it. But I don't really care about mascots, they don't win Super Bowls. Come to think of it, neither do cheerleaders! So knock the organization all you want, but.......BOTTOM LINE IS CINCINNATI DOES NOT EVEN HAVE ONE TITLE, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA! (If you guys get a mascot maybe you can use those for names). Or how about 0 for 2.WIN THE BIG ONE THEN MAYBE YOU LOSERS CAN RUN YOUR MOUTHS!Super bowl wins.1*,2*,3*,4*,5*Some of those wins could have been without the use of roids but we'll probably never know.Roidie McRoidertonFunny you bring this up. I'm hoping to make it to the doubleheader in Pissburgh next Monday against the Giants. I figure there will be plenty of folks there with their 'asterisk' message, so I'm working on a big board that says:THE IMPACT OF STEROIDSBonds 2007 *Steelers 1975 *, 1976 *, 1978 *, 1979 *I'm still working on the message, but that is the idea. Boy, would I have a good time with that! The point is that I just want folks to be consistent. It is amazing to me how Pissburghers love to put an asterisk by Bonds because of steroids, but how dare anyone make the exact same argument about the 70s Steelers. Yet it is a well-known fact (i.e. players on those teams later admitted usage) that they were 'ahead of the game' in terms of using this drug. If Bonds had an unfair advantage, and if records matter, then the same set of rules should be applied to the champions of the 70s.don't forget 2005, they had moved on to HGH by 2005 though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenyon1977 Posted August 8, 2007 Report Share Posted August 8, 2007 Has anyone done the homework for comparing these players' sizes in college and when they played in the Superbowl? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelerFan87 Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 LMAO!!! So you guys think the Steelers were on roids in 05? So, what, if the Bengals somehow manage to win a SB, will they be on roids too? No, of course not you'll say. The NFL tests for steroids. But, since you hate the Steelers, you somehow have to find some way of negating our 5th SB win, since you guys still have none, so you say this. How pathetic. Give me 1 Steelers player who failed a drug test in 05. And if you say "oh, but they were taking HGH" then feel free to eat crow if the Bengals ever win a SB. Of course, I don't think you guys have to worry about that happening any time soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenyon1977 Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 LMAO!!! So you guys think the Steelers were on roids in 05? So, what, if the Bengals somehow manage to win a SB, will they be on roids too? No, of course not you'll say. The NFL tests for steroids. But, since you hate the Steelers, you somehow have to find some way of negating our 5th SB win, since you guys still have none, so you say this. How pathetic. Give me 1 Steelers player who failed a drug test in 05. And if you say "oh, but they were taking HGH" then feel free to eat crow if the Bengals ever win a SB. Of course, I don't think you guys have to worry about that happening any time soon.Well we haven't had any issues with people close to the franchise or Employed to be caught precribing this stuff. Not to mention the Ref's were paid off probably by the same low level scum that paid off the NBA ref for your little 05 win.Go Seahawks. They won that game put an asterisk in for your amazing TD from the 2 yard line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottishbengal Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 Bill Cowher ? Bill Cowher ? Bill Cowher? or Bill Cowher? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duus Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 LMAO!!! So you guys think the Steelers were on roids in 05? So, what, if the Bengals somehow manage to win a SB, will they be on roids too? No, of course not you'll say. The NFL tests for steroids. But, since you hate the Steelers, you somehow have to find some way of negating our 5th SB win, since you guys still have none, so you say this. How pathetic. Give me 1 Steelers player who failed a drug test in 05. And if you say "oh, but they were taking HGH" then feel free to eat crow if the Bengals ever win a SB. Of course, I don't think you guys have to worry about that happening any time soon.Funny how there was no dispute about the 70s. * * * * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riagogogoindanati Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 Rusty Peteor Rusty Cornhole PeteEdmund Fitzgerald Kinda is a cross between a rusty steel worker and a peg leg sea captain! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 AnabolBob SquareHead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rishipatel Posted August 9, 2007 Report Share Posted August 9, 2007 And the winner is....Steely McBeam. Maybe I should say the loser is Steely McBeam. So gay... but at least it is better than Crunch Buttsteak and some of the others, although only marginally so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.