Bobcat Bengal Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/9378806(April 15, 2006) -- This is my first of three mock drafts that I will create for NFL.com leading up to the draft at the end of the month. I will assume that there will be no pre-draft trades that could change the decision making along the way. I will combine the activity in free agency, the needs of the teams, and the grades of the players as draft boards start to take shape. 1. Houston: Reggie Bush, RB, USC Bush is a once-in-a-decade player and a matchup nightmare. He had 38 touchdowns in three years at USC. 2. New Orleans: D'Brickashaw Ferguson, OT, Virginia He could move down but a 10-year starter is too hard to resist. The Saints traded Wayne Gandy, a starter at tackle last season, to Atlanta. 3. Tennessee: Matt Leinart, QB, USC Leinart threw for more touchdown passes in college than Vince Young and Jay Cutler combined. He also knows the Titans' offense, having played under coordinator Norm Chow at USC. 4. N.Y. Jets: Mario Williams, DE, N.C. State Williams can replace John Abraham, who was traded this offseason. He reminds new coach Eric Mangini of the Patriots' Richard Seymour and can play in either the 3-4 or 4-3. 5. Green Bay: Haloti Ngata, DT, Oregon Having Ngata in the middle makes Green Bay defensive ends Aaron Kampman and Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila better. Ngata stops the run and has a rare combination of size and speed. 6. San Francisco: Vernon Davis, TE, Maryland A young quarterback like Alex Smith always needs a tight end to be effective and Davis can provide major matchup problems. 7. Oakland: Vince Young, QB, Texas Aaron Brooks signed a two-year deal with the Raiders, but owner Al Davis likes Young's upside. Randy Moss could make a perfect partner. 8. Buffalo: Brodrick Bunkley, DT, Florida State The best under tackle for the new 'Dungy' defense, Bunkley has a talent that is hard to find. 9. Detroit: Michael Huff, DB, Texas The safest pick in the draft, Huff can play either cornerback or safety. He is a leader and a Matt Millen-type player. 10. Arizona: Jay Cutler, QB, Vanderbilt Kurt Warner is old and brittle and Cutler is Brett Favre-like. He's still two years away, though. 11. St. Louis: A.J. Hawk, OLB, Ohio State Hawk should have been gone by now but will become a cornerstone for Jim Haslett's defense. 12. Cleveland: Kamerion Wimbley, DE, Florida State Wimbley is the perfect fit for the 3-4 defense and reminds general manager Phil Savage of Peter Boulware, who Savage helped draft in Baltimore. 13. Baltimore: Winston Justice, OT, USC The Ravens can use Justice at right tackle until Jonathan Ogden retires. 14. Philadelphia: Chad Jackson, WR, Florida The Eagles failed to land Eric Moulds and released Terrell Owens, so they could use Jackson right away. 15. Denver: Santonio Holmes, WR, Ohio State The Broncos can trade Ashley Lelie right after this pick. 16. Miami: Ernie Sims, OLB, Florida State Sims is a tackling machine and replaces Junior Seau on the Dolphins defense. 17. Minnesota: Chad Greenway, OLB, Iowa Greenway has a high character, the type of player that new coach Brad Childress wants on the team. 18. Dallas: Manny Lawson, LB, N.C. State Lawson is the perfect complement to DeMarcus Ware. 19. San Diego: Jimmy Williams, DB, Virginia Tech Williams can be a corner or safety and the Chargers need to replace Sammy Davis in the secondary. 20. Kansas City: Antonio Cromartie, CB, Florida State Cromartie is a tremendous athlete and has had excellent workouts. The Chiefs really need to focus on defense in the draft. 21. New England: DeMeco Ryans, OLB, Alabama The Patriots replace Willie McGinest with Ryans, a highly productive linebacker. 22. Denver: DeAngelo Williams, RB, Memphis The Broncos got the wide receiver earlier in the draft and the running back completes their first round. 23. Tampa Bay: Mathias Kiwanuka, DE, Boston College Kiwanuka can learn for a year behing Simeon Rice. He had 34 sacks in college. 24. Cincinnati: Nick Mangold, C, Ohio State Bengals center Rich Braham is 36 years old and in the last year of his contract. 25. N.Y. Giants: Bobby Carpenter, OLB, Ohio State The son of former Giants running back Rob Carpenter, he is a versatile linebacker than can fill two needs. 26. Chicago: Tye Hill, CB, Clemson This pick could change if the Bears acquire a cornerback in free agency. 27. Carolina: Laurence Maroney, RB, Minnesota With Stephen Davis gone, the Panthers need a back to complement DeShaun Foster. 28. Jacksonville: Tamba Hali, DE, Penn State A slow time in the 40-yard dash drops Hali, but he could be used replace Paul Spicer. 29. N.Y. Jets: Eric Winston, OT, Miami The Jets missed out on Ferguson earlier and left tackle is a top need. 30. Indianapolis: Thomas Howard, OLB, Texas-El Paso USC running back LenDale White is there but the Colts also lost linebacker David Thornton. 31. Seattle: Davin Joseph, G, Oklahoma: Joseph is an immediate replacement for Steve Hutchinson. 32. Pittsburgh: Rodrique Wright, DT, Texas: White looks tempting, but Wright answers a bigger need. Second Round The second round looks as good as half of the first round and teams can really satisfy some of their pressing needs with players capable of making an early impact. Of course, some of the players selected in the first round could easily fall to the second round and a few of the following players could be taken in the first round. 33. Houston: Marcus McNeil, OT, Auburn34. New Orleans: Johnathan Joseph, CB, South Carolina35. N.Y. Jets: Andrew Whitworth, OT, Louisiana State36. Green Bay: Roger McIntosh, OLB, Miami37. San Francisco: Jason Allen, DB, Tennessee38. Oakland: Claude Wroten, DT, Louisiana State39. Tennessee: Abdul Hodge, ILB, Iowa40. Detroit: Kelly Jennings, CB, Miami41. Arizona: Darnell Bing, S, USC42. Buffalo: Ashton Youboty, CB, Ohio State43. Cleveland: Gabe Watson, DT, Michigan44. Baltimore: Ko Simpson, S, South Carolina45. Philadelphia: LenDale White, RB, USC46. St. Louis: Marcedes Lewis, TE, UCLA47. Atlanta: Deuce Lutui, G, USC48. Minnesota: Anthony Fasano, TE, Notre Dame49. Dallas: Pat Watkins, FS, Florida State50. San Diego: Sinorice Moss, WR, Miami51. Minnesota: Brodie Croyle, QB, Alabama52. New England: Brian Calhoun, RB, Wisconsin53. Washington: Ray Edwards, DE, Purdue54. Kansas City: Donte Whitner, SS, Ohio State55. Cincinnati: Leonard Pope, TE, Georgia56. N.Y. Giants: Jon Scott, OT, Texas57. Chicago: Joe Klopfenstein, TE, Colorado58. Carolina: Max Jean-Gilles, G, Georgia59. Tampa Bay: Daniel Bullocks, S, Nebraska60. Jacksonville: Joseph Addai, RB, Louisiana State61. Denver: Dominique Byrd, TE, USC62. Indianapolis: Jerious Norwood, RB, Mississippi State63. Seattle: Jon Alston, OLB, Stanford64. Pittsburgh: Maurice Stoval, WR, Notre Dame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 My offer stands to anyone willing to make a wager on this happening...WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 The author of this mock has completely neglected to account for Ghiaciuc and Wilkerson. Very stupid of him, considering Ghiaciuc's quality start against the Jags, and the fact that they have both absorbed the playbook by now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 God I hope this does not happen. Those are two good players but we need D help not O.Did this guy do no research on the Bengals at all?I am hoping for an all D first day in this draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 My offer stands to anyone willing to make a wager on this happening...WHODEY !!!I already bet one of my best friends that if the Bengals take Mangold, I won't be a Bengals fan anymore and he can pick my new favorite team.This mock, at the ery least, proves Pat Kirwan's retardation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 As soon as I realized this was a 2 round mock I became very interested in where Kirwan projected Leonard Pope to fall as Kirwan has been one of Pope's most vocal critics. Naturally, he projects him to be drafted by the Bengals at #55. I've said it before and I'll repeat it now. I hope the Bengals pass on Pope if he's there at #55. I'm not very fond of the idea of the Bengals using it's two highest draft picks on offense, either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 The author of this mock has completely neglected to account for Ghiaciuc and Wilkerson. Very stupid of him, considering Ghiaciuc's quality start against the Jags, and the fact that they have both absorbed the playbook by nowwell that and wilkerson was tied for best center in the draft last year Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK Bengal Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 This guy must be insane this is his first round pick for the bengals.24. Cincinnati: Nick Mangold, C, Ohio State Bengals center Rich Braham is 36 years old and in the last year of his contract. hello !!!!! we have guycheck and ben wilkerson why on gods green earth would we draft a center !!!this is one dumb pick imo no reason for marvin to do this at all but i guess the guy does work for nfl.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted April 16, 2006 Report Share Posted April 16, 2006 Aye center is a must not in anyround but not alot of nice defensive choices around for us at 24 though i'd trade down and take pop Only choices I really would see is trade down for Pope,tye hill ko simpson or donte whitner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walshfan Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Your people really think Wilkerson or Guycheck are the answer to the center position... whatever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walshfan Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Your people really think Wilkerson or Guycheck are the answer to the center position... whateverthe Bengals havent had success on the Oline with second day draftees.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybren Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Your people really think Wilkerson or Guycheck are the answer to the center position... whateverMarvin seems to think so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Your people really think Wilkerson or Guycheck are the answer to the center position... whateverthe Bengals havent had success on the Oline with second day draftees....Perhaps you aren't aware of of few things - it certainly seems you aren'tScroll down to the 7th round of http://www.nfl.com/draft/history/years/2003 to find the name of our top reserve, Scott Kooistra, who is capable enought at the RT position that when he stepped in when All Pro Willie Anderson was injured, our offense did not miss a beatPerhaps you've heard of the heir apparent at LT, Stacey Andrews? 4th rounder.Perhaps you did not watch the Jacksonville game, where Ghiaciuc (4th round, 2005) proved his mettle against the top rated DTs of the JagsPerhaps you should also check the draft positions of the players on the great offensive line of 1988. Munoz was at the top of round 1, but check the others. It will be a learning experience for you.All that said, what's really the truth of the matter is that we spent a number of early draft picks to improve our defensive line to the point it has reached. This isn't a case of "we only succeed with early picks" but rather we actively chose as an organization to emphasize the building of a powerful offensive line. As of this past year, we've finally suceeded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybren Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Perhaps you should also check the draft positions of the players on the great offensive line of 1988. Munoz was at the top of round 1, but check the others. It will be a learning experience for you.He clarified his position in the Gilles thread. It's second day, OL picks when Paul Alexander was the coach. So it's not just about the team's fortunes with a particular round and position, it's about a particular coach's fortunes with a particular round and position. Apparently he's only successful with good players like Willie, Levi and Steinbach. A Phil Jackson of linemen.As Tom Cruise would say, I've done the research (posted in more detail in the other thread) and concluded that of the 10 second day OL picks of the past 11 years, the Bengals have only gotten starts from Rod Jones (7th round, 1999) and Ghiaciuc (4th, 2005) and legitimate playing time from Victor Leyva (5th, 2000) and Scott Kooistra (7th, 2003). 4 out of 10. Including Andrews and Kieft who shouldn't be judged yet.Let's hope no quality o-linemen drop into the 4th round, or we won't be able to use them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GapControl Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 I partied in Ben Wilkerson`s girlfriends apartment in Cincy last year. Neither of them were there but I did see a lot of pictures of him around. His girl is about 5 foot 1 or so. Pretty funny looking, them together. A friend of hers let me and my buddies stay there because our tire went flat on 1-75. Now, I am a huge Wilkerson fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Has he bothered to consider that the team might have wanted to spend early picks to build a particularly potent offensive line?Of course not.His theory is a piece of trash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Bengal Posted April 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 lol, I'm just sayin' though..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schweinhart Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 The odds that the Bengals draft Mangold are highly unlikely but he's being touted as the best center prospect in a decade so they might look and see what kind of deal they can put together to add another established player and another pick.But the odds seem likelier that they'd give more consideration to putting a deal together to trade their pick down to a team that needs Mangold right away.As for the Bengals O-Line, I remain hopeful that that they re-sign either Levi or Steinbach (and if at all possible both) and use their other lineman or free agency to fill whatever losses might happen after next year rather than using a Day 1 pick or even Day 2 picks on O-linemen this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 I'm finally happy to see people giving credit for what we do have on the o-line and to the center position in general. This has been covered before, but it's still nice to see !!! JUST SAY NO TO MANGOLD !!!WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 I'm not a big fan of the draft Nick Mangold scenario. That said, I've got to wonder if the presence of Ghiaciuc and Wilkerson is enough to kill the idea outright. The Bengals have very little invested in both of those players, and Ghiaciuc wasn't exactly named the center of the future when he was drafted. Instead, his selection was explained by the need for depth at the interior positions and his potential to become a starter at C when Braham calls it a day. Maybe Ghiacuic becomes a future starter, or maybe he doesn't....but the investment of a 4th round pick probably isn't enough to prevent the Bengals from CONSIDERING drafting Mangold if the draft doesn't fall the way they'd like. In addition, this is a very weak draft for teams looking to add a C. As for Wilkerson, I'll argue that his UFA signing was a stroke of brilliance no matter how it plays out, but there's never been a guarantee that he'll ever return to form, and we are rapidly approaching a point in time where a decision on his injury recovery and playing future will have to be made. If the answers reached aren't positive, and the Bengals have no plans for Braham beyond this season, then the selection of Mangold becomes far more attractive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Hair, couldn't agree with you more about time to make a decision about Wilkerson, as well as if the answers not being positive in nature. If that is the case, I'll concede the drafting of Mangold at a minimum, is more than an afterthought. That being said, if the answers ARE positive in nature, than I go back to my original line of thought.... NO to Mangold !!!WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 If we are up to pick, and Mangold seems to be our best option...Trade down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 If we are up to pick, and Mangold seems to be our best option...Trade down.And even if we can't find a trade down partner, pick the next best defensive player.....NO MANGOLD.I have no idea why he keeps getting pimped here except that some of you think we should just take players from Ohio State only, which is ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walzav29 Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 Pat Kirwan says the Bengals will select Mangold. I hope not, because they drafted Guichec and signed Wilkerson. What would have been the point? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who Dey Time Posted April 18, 2006 Report Share Posted April 18, 2006 I agree. Mangold doesn't seem to fit here. I'm hoping for a corner to replace Tory James or a defensive lineman.Draft Jonathan Joseph!!WHO-DEY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.