AMC Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I go with about 65% right now.....Interesting to see what happens with Landon and Caleb as well. Third round picks to be had there if the Bengals don't match any offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTG Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I hope one of them gets taken. We need a third rounder and I don't like either one of them in the first place. As far as trading down, I could see it happening if all of the top DTs are gone. Remember the 2004 draft? How many spots did we trade down to take Chris Perry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChadJohnson-85 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I rather have Caleb back then Landon any day. But I wouldn't be upset if someone got Caleb cause I really want the Bengals to get a 3rd round pick! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 310 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 This draft is a lot like last year. There doesn't appear to be a tremendous separation between the quality of play you could grab at #8 versus #28. Therefore, I'm not cure why a team would be interested in trading into the #18 slot...unless it is someone like Denver and they have an extra 3rd to play with. Even then though, that would have to be a draft day move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James_Brooks21 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I go with about 65% right now.....Interesting to see what happens with Landon and Caleb as well. Third round picks to be had there if the Bengals don't match any offer.65% or you insane or something? The Bengals are not trading down they need too much help to trade down and there are too many quality picks to trade down someone is going to be sitting at the 18th pick that we need. If you use Chris Perry is a bad example because all he has been to me and the rest of the fans is a disappointment. Nobody is dumb enough to try and get either one of those linebackers and give up a third round pick, they are backups on anybody else team. If you have to start either one of those guys that means your team is in bad shape at that position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BTG Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I go with about 65% right now.....Interesting to see what happens with Landon and Caleb as well. Third round picks to be had there if the Bengals don't match any offer.65% or you insane or something? The Bengals are not trading down they need too much help to trade down and there are too many quality picks to trade down someone is going to be sitting at the 18th pick that we need. If you use Chris Perry is a bad example because all he has been to me and the rest of the fans is a disappointment. Nobody is dumb enough to try and get either one of those linebackers and give up a third round pick, they are backups on anybody else team. If you have to start either one of those guys that means your team is in bad shape at that position.Even though you (and I) may not like Johnson, there are several teams he could likely start for, or at least contribute to. Just off the top of my head: San Francisco, St. Louis, Washington, the Giants, Cleveland, Miami, Indy, Tampa, Tennessee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I hope we stay put. We are in perfect posistion to land Willis where we are Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengal4life Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Why does everyone think we need a third rounder so bad? We already picked our third rounder, his name is Ahmad Brooks. I think we should stay with the 18th pick. If anything happens it will be Miller or Johnson picked up by another team giving us a third round pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I rather have Caleb back then Landon any day. But I wouldn't be upset if someone got Caleb cause I really want the Bengals to get a 3rd round pick!What's your rationale there? Landon is simply a better all-around player in every facet.Caleb Miller is simply another overrated player by Bengals' fans, and not very good.Landon is the equivalent of Brian Simmons' IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kayaker0678 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Landon is way better than Calab. Landon led the team in tackles this year. Who would want to lose a player like that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMC Posted March 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I go with about 65% right now.....Interesting to see what happens with Landon and Caleb as well. Third round picks to be had there if the Bengals don't match any offer.65% or you insane or something? The Bengals are not trading down they need too much help to trade down and there are too many quality picks to trade down someone is going to be sitting at the 18th pick that we need. If you use Chris Perry is a bad example because all he has been to me and the rest of the fans is a disappointment. Nobody is dumb enough to try and get either one of those linebackers and give up a third round pick, they are backups on anybody else team. If you have to start either one of those guys that means your team is in bad shape at that position.Well, if we have a pick in the third round as opposed to not having one that would fill one of the holes that you speak of....And the player at say #24 would be as effective in "filling a hole" as the player at #18....Which fills more needs???1) #18or 2) #24 PLUS a third round pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwalling Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Either by trading down, trading a player or losing a free agent, we'll have a 3rd rounder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I hope the Bengals make a push to resign Landon. He is better than he gets credit for on these boards. His issue is being banged up, but he plays through it and is productive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMC Posted March 1, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I hope the Bengals make a push to resign Landon. He is better than he gets credit for on these boards. His issue is being banged up, but he plays through it and is productive.Here here.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I rather have Caleb back then Landon any day. But I wouldn't be upset if someone got Caleb cause I really want the Bengals to get a 3rd round pick!Because he's white? outside of that I don't see how you could want caleb over landon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I rather have Caleb back then Landon any day. But I wouldn't be upset if someone got Caleb cause I really want the Bengals to get a 3rd round pick!Because he's white? Naw, because of his creative hairstyles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoePong Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 We could try to trade down if there are still a several players available that we like. This is likely since there are so many evenly rated players between 15 and 30. If the Bengals decide that one of their targeted players will still be there at the position they are contemplating trading down to, they will probably do it (like they did when they picked Chris Perry).But you need a partner who is willing to make a trade. You just can't decide to trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 We dont need a 3rd round pick, we already used it. Ahmad Brooks was a 1st rounder who we got in the 3rd, major steal. We might loose some players and get compensation for it so I am fine where we are at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I rather have Caleb back then Landon any day. But I wouldn't be upset if someone got Caleb cause I really want the Bengals to get a 3rd round pick!Because he's white? Naw, because of his creative hairstyles. I love his emo hair.Only way I want to see us trade down is no one looks be worth 18 on board....Ala Timmons,willis,Griffin,Houston "shudder" mybe hall,branch,Landry (ya right) reggie nelson etc etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Bengal Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 Landon is way better than Calab. Landon led the team in tackles this year. Who would want to lose a player like that?I'm sayin' man....Where's all the hate coming from with Landon?wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I dunno Bobcat, Landon is a solid player, but so is Caleb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted March 1, 2007 Report Share Posted March 1, 2007 I rather have Caleb back then Landon any day. But I wouldn't be upset if someone got Caleb cause I really want the Bengals to get a 3rd round pick!Because he's white? Naw, because of his creative hairstyles. There's a fine line between creative and Amaechi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.