Kazkal Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 re Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Nope, can't say I would, Kazzy. I think we'll draft two or three defensive backs in all, but I doubt they'll come in the first two rounds at the exact same position. I also doubt Bing will be available when we pick in the second. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 What TBD said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Nope, can't say I would, Kazzy. I think we'll draft two or three defensive backs in all, but I doubt they'll come in the first two rounds at the exact same position. I also doubt Bing will be available when we pick in the second.Yo! Hit the nail on the head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted February 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Reason I was thinking about it depending on ko and bings coerage skill might be intresting have all 3 in there @ once try confuse em whos gonna do what etc but then again would have pass on TE/DT which would be more of a need Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Reason I was thinking about it depending on ko and bings coerage skill might be intresting have all 3 in there @ once try confuse em whos gonna do what etc but then again would have pass on TE/DT which would be more of a need It would certainly be an interesting formation to include a third safety. If any coaches were to decide to employ that idea, I'd assume they'd just throw one of their backup defensive backs out there, rather than worry about drafting two good ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted February 9, 2006 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2006 true + still need a DT anyways heh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalChamps Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 I cant see us drafting back to back safeties. I guess it could happen if Bing is the BPA, but getting depth at LB, DL, and CB seem to be pretty important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da boss Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 i think that the bengals are going to draft a DT first because donte whitner has a good chance of still being there in the second round, but if we get either whitner or simpson i will be happy. i am not really sold on darnell bing yet but i will wait untill the combines are over to judge him.WHO DEY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thepudgester Posted February 11, 2006 Report Share Posted February 11, 2006 Bind doesn't fit and if you wanted to use a defense with three Safety's to confuse them, Whitner would be their man. Whitner is faster, just as agressive, and has a lot of experience rushing the passer. I have Whitner rated above Bing for my Safety rankings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.