Stripes Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 Bing would be nice him,williams+ oneal omg that would be sweet....Though hopfully pope,lewis or davis would fall to #52....ya right lol A draft related post by Kazkal that doesn't include Haloti Ngata?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted January 16, 2006 Report Share Posted January 16, 2006 Bing would be nice him,williams+ oneal omg that would be sweet....Though hopfully pope,lewis or davis would fall to #52....ya right lol A draft related post by Kazkal that doesn't include Haloti Ngata?! Don't be too amazed. He did mention Leonard Pope. If you look carefully, that's in all of his draft posts, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 According to Bengals.com, today is exactly 100 days until the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Wow. I'm way to worked up and way too early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Draft Ko Simpson....nuff said there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Bing would be nice him,williams+ oneal omg that would be sweet....Though hopfully pope,lewis or davis would fall to #52....ya right lol A draft related post by Kazkal that doesn't include Haloti Ngata?! Don't be too amazed. He did mention Leonard Pope. If you look carefully, that's in all of his draft posts, too.Just in my recent ones I've came to terms that there is no way we get ngata because even if he still needs work he'd never fall a mammoth like him whos just not a hog but has speed just is something you don't pass on him/snivles why all this hate Pope is a dawg just trying unite him with pollack and thurman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalsLB Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Draft Ko Simpson....nuff said there.he won't be there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShulaSteakhouse Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Huff is projected to go in the teens now and his stock is rising. I seriously doubt he'll be there for the Bengals.Don't rule out the possibility of the Bengals' picking a center. With the money they have invested in Palmer - and his injury to boot - I think it's more of a priority than we might think.I suppose FA will dictate this - but can see the 1st pick going to either the d or o lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Draft Ko Simpson....nuff said there.he won't be thereIt's a possibility. It is a very deep safety class, which could keep him on the board, but the safeties are being hyped a lot this year, which could take them off of the board pretty quickly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesperateDerelict Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Don't rule out the possibility of the Bengals' picking a center. With the money they have invested in Palmer - and his injury to boot - I think it's more of a priority than we might think.That's why we got Guy-check & Wilkerson - thinking ahead. The team realizes they need to think ahead 2 - 3 years, and select 'project' or 'potential' players. Therefore, look for them to invest later round picks this year in OG, maybe OT, and CB.With the depth of SS and TE in this years draft, I can see Tobin and Marvin and Mikey trying to get lucky in Rounds 2 and 3 with these positions, looking for a 'flawed' diamond in the rough (ala Odell and Chris Henry). RB and QB are also strong this year, but we have little / no need.By process of elimination, I see us taking a 'sure bet' DL - DT's - A few possibles:Ngata - should be top 10, maybe top 5.Gabe Watson - love those Michigan kidsWroten (although he now has baggage - he can room with Henry)R. Wright - huge underachiever Bunkley (I think he's too light, but he might be 'bulkable')O. Harris - I want to see his Wonderlic score firstJ. Maholena (NC ST) - depends on workoutsDE's - harder to come byM. Williams / Kiwi - unless they screw up between now and the draft, they'll be long gone.T. Hali - Opinions vary widelyDumervil - If he's fast enough, he's an NFL OLB in the 3 - 4, not a DE.K. Wimbley (FSU) - Can help himself alot at the CombineLawson - (NC St) - Did he make Mario, or did Mario make him?However, until the Combine in February, we won't know who the NFL-ready players will be!It's a possibility. It is a very deep safety class, which could keep him on the board, but the safeties are being hyped a lot this year, which could take them off of the board pretty quickly.Safeties are hyped every year, but NFL teams do NOT like to invest top picks in safeties - that's not to say that too many of these guys will be available at the end of the 2nd round, but fewer safeties are chosen in the 1st round than any other defensive position! (look it up!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurgan74 Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Another interesting TE canidate would be Auburn's Anthony Mix. He played both TE and WR for the Tigers. He is projected as a TE in the draft 6'5 250. He has nice speed and very good hands. I have ssen some projecting him between rounds 4 & 6. He could be a real steal later in the draft, if the Bengals go defensive early on. This year he had 23 catches for 288 yards (3rd on the team in catches) and averaged 12.5 yards per catch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schweinhart Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 The team need vs. best available debate is proly inevitable at this point.There are a bunch of servicable safeties in this year's draft and the best of the bunch minus 1 or 2 will be there with the Bengals 1st pick. Also a strength of this draft is TE and OT. Maybe the 3rd best TE is there and the 4th, 5th, or 6th best OT prospect. But the strongest position is LB -- both outside and inside. A really, really good LB could be had at this pick.The weak positions of this draft for 1st round picks looks to me like DTs, WRs, and C overall and past the top 2 or 3, DE and CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 The team need vs. best available debate is proly inevitable at this point. Then let's get started. IMHO drafting the so-called best player available is just an example of coachspeak, because whether they admit it or not all teams adjust and weight their draft boards with team needs in mind. For those who disagree, just look at last years Bengal draft. Not only was it highly successful, it was a perfect example of a very hungry coaching staff placing their orders directly off the menu. No substitutions. No special orders. And with very few exceptions, if any at all, that's has been the way it's gone since Marvin arrived. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesperateDerelict Posted January 19, 2006 Report Share Posted January 19, 2006 Any chance that the board - meisters around here with alot of time on their hands can emulate the Redskins or Saints mock draftboards? We could have something that looks like this:MOCK DRAFT....................DATE.........PROJECTED CIN 1ST ROUNDER....COLLEGE FantasyFootballXTreme........1/17...............Marcedes Lewis (TE).................UCLA QI Sports..............................1/17..............Brodrick Bunkley (DT)................FSU Draft TX.com.........................1/16.............Claude Wroten (DT)....................LSU Heard's Football Report.........1/16.............Darnell Bing (S).........................USC Draft Daddy..........................1/16..............Rod Wright (DT)........................TEXAS HuddleGeeks........................1/16..............Rod Wright (DT)........................TEXAS East Coast Sports.................1/16..............Tamba Hali (DE).......................PENN ST Draft Ace...............................1/14..............Claude Wroten (DT).....................LSU The Football Experts.............1/14..............Marcedes Lewis (TE)..................UCLA Friendly Bet...........................1/12..............Elvis Dumervil (DE)..................LOUISVILLE FF Toolbox.............................1/12..............Jesse Mahelona (DT)...................TEN Football Futures.....................1/12..............Jesse Mahelona (DT)...................TEN Walters Football.....................1/12..............Gabe Watson (DT)....................U of MICH Obviously, I have neither the time nor the talent . . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted January 20, 2006 Report Share Posted January 20, 2006 Forgot what post it was but who ever worries if SS doesn't have best times take a look @ madieu'sAGILITY TESTS4.5 in the 40-yard dash (indoor track) … 4.6 in the 40-yard dash (outdoors) … 345-pound bench press … 560-pound squat … 36½-inch vertical jump … 31¼-inch arm length … 9-inch hands.and he's 100% stud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schweinhart Posted January 21, 2006 Report Share Posted January 21, 2006 IMHO drafting the so-called best player available is just an example of coachspeak, because whether they admit it or not all teams adjust and weight their draft boards with team needs in mind. For those who disagree, just look at last years Bengal draft. Not only was it highly successful, it was a perfect example of a very hungry coaching staff placing their orders directly off the menu. No substitutions. No special orders. And with very few exceptions, if any at all, that's has been the way it's gone since Marvin arrived.There's no question that teams draft with team needs in mind. But the final consideration of best player available in the 1st round should bear more weight than immediate position need because that pick can also be instrumental in addressing future needs beyond that draft year or the year after that. The BPA pick makes more sense later in the round when the "sure things" at the costliest positions are pretty much off the board.Not to suggest redundancy at position and the pick that comes to mind recently was Larry Johnson by the Chiefs when they already had Priest Holmes. The closest Bengals example would be Chris Perry in 2004. No doubt the Bengals needed an RB in the exodus of Dillon and the moving on of Brandon Bennett, but Rudi was there as was Kenny Watson. From a standpoint of team need -- for a team still in the middle of wholesale turnover on the defensive side of the ball I might add -- burning a 1st rounder on an RB simply did not support that immediate team need was given the foremost priority in the 1st round. Did they need a 3rd RB? Yes, but in the 1st round? They took who they thought was the best player available at a position of possible future need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.