USMC203 Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 There does not seem to be a good DT in the draft or SS. I say bring on Askew, S. Smith and Fenene. We can then take up a collection and tell Mr. Brown that we will pay the signing bonus fo a BIG DT FA and he can just go out and lay down to slow the run up a little, that is more than what we got now. We need FAT not FAST up front. Also a couple of TE that can block and catch, more on that later (Ryan Hamby TE OHIO St). I don't think our ship is sinking we are just going to get our feet wet!!!!!!!!!!! Lets get over the loss and get ready for next Sunday, as Coach Marvin said" Learn from it and get ready for the next one" . When a Steelers Fan gets on here, don't even read there Bull S**T . We all know we got out played by a good team, we don't need to hear it from a bunch of GOOFY A** Pitts Fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkendall Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 You better talk to Marvin too who's opted not to sign big (fat) free agent defensive tackles (Warren Sapp, Corey Simon) in favor of the athletic defensive linemen while keeping costs as balanced as possible -- not too much $$ in one position with Chad bitching about money, and Willie, most likely, wanting a phat contract extension that takes him to retirement. Ryan Hamby? Yea, why have Chris Henry drop passes in the end-zone when we could have a tight end that does the same. Oh well, I'm sure things will get back to normal soon. It was just a bad week -- remember Pittsburgh's near self-destruction after losing to JAX because of Tommy Maddox? We'll be fine. It's the bounce-back factor we (well, the Bengals) need to focus on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMC Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 Marvin doesn't sign big DTs and gives the impression that he doesn't want or need them, but his BEST defense was based on them....Siragusa and Adams in Baltimore keeping OL off of Ray Lewis....why the change in philosophy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 There does not seem to be a good DT in the draft or SS.Seriously? You're kidding right? Maybe you were talking about last year... in which case you are right. However, 2006 is loaded.Rod Wright 6-5, 305 TexasJesse Maholena 6-2, 300 Tennessee Kyle Williams 6-2, 295 LSUHaloti Ngata 6-4, 345 OregonRod Wright 6-5, 305 TexasGabe Watson 6-3, 330 Michigan All these guys have been projected to go in one experts mind or another. Not to mention guys likeOrien Harris 6-2, 300 MiamiJonathan Lewis 6-1, 310 Virginia Tech One of them will drop to us for sure. As for SS, I agree. There isn't anything 1st round worthy... but it's also not our primary need. Our secondary has played very well. Next year Madieu will be back, and KK has played much better than anyone thought. He's not a pro-bowler... but we don't need to use a 1st rounder there.I've been a big Thornton supporter... but the combination of him and Robinson hasn't done much to stop the run the past few games. I don't know if it is them, or the system, or what... but something's got to change. My guess is we get one of the more beefy DT's late in the first round... Whether we go to a 3-4, or just just move Robinson over, I don't know. I'd be fine with either... but next year, the run defense problems will be a distant memory. I believe it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 Keith Blue in Round Two!has a nice ring to it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cincyhokie Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 We NEED to hit the FA market this offseason, one rookie draft is not going to fix the glaring problems.Ok, lets follow your plan. We hit the free agent market this offseason and ignore everything else to get run stoppers.Guess what happens? WE go 0-16, stopping the run but being unable to put up any points because we lose most of our offensive linemen to free agency.Good plan.My point was not to say that a good draft won't help this team. It will. But a draft takes time to develop. Even if we draft 2 rookies on the DL, they're not going to shore up the defense next year as much as some proven talent.Now, I could be wrong on this completely as I have not looked at this year's FAs that are going to be available.I do think that there are a couple of OL that must stay. Anderson and Steinbach. That's it. The rest are good, solid players but they are not irreplacible.With all that said, I really don't care how Marvin does it, through the draft or FA. I'll just trust that he knows what he is doing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 Kirk, this is not one I'm willing to sit by on at all. While I understand and agree to an extent with what you are saying, if the D would make a stop in the second half, they would have gotten off the field. I agree the offense didn't help in this matter in going 3 and out or turnovers, but when turnovers happen, the D has to respond. They responded by getting ran the F**K over. God knows there is enough blame to go around, but God I hate our run defense so much, I've been looking for small animals or children to kick all day !!!WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMC203 Posted October 24, 2005 Report Share Posted October 24, 2005 We NEED to hit the FA market this offseason, one rookie draft is not going to fix the glaring problems.Ok, lets follow your plan. We hit the free agent market this offseason and ignore everything else to get run stoppers.Guess what happens? WE go 0-16, stopping the run but being unable to put up any points because we lose most of our offensive linemen to free agency.Good plan.Where in the post does it say 'totally ignore the offensive line and sign DL free agents'? So, what you are saying is we are pretty much stuck with our current DL, because they have to sign their OL? Let me get this straight....what?The O line looks good for the next couple of years Ghiaciuc plays G & C,P. Lougheed, Viera, Keift plays G & T, Wilkerson C & G, Andrews Plays both T spots. plus the starters we got now. The D line SUCKS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alense Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Haloti Ngata 6-4, 345 OregonI like this guy. I've never seen him play, but I like this guy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkendall Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Kirk, this is not one I'm willing to sit by on at all. While I understand and agree to an extent with what you are saying, if the D would make a stop in the second half, they would have gotten off the field. I agree the offense didn't help in this matter in going 3 and out or turnovers, but when turnovers happen, the D has to respond. They responded by getting ran the F**K over. God knows there is enough blame to go around, but God I hate our run defense so much, I've been looking for small animals or children to kick all day !!!WHODEY !!!Oh, I agree, the defense didn't do the team any good by letting Parker, Bettis, and Haynes run over them. I'm not arguing that at all. This was, by far, the worst team effort by the team. I won't argue that point at all. But for the sake of keeping the discussion going, look at it this way:In the first half, the Pittsburgh offense averaged 4.7 yards per rush. In comparison, the Steelers offense averaged 4.7 yards in the second half. No difference. In the first half, the Steelers offense ran 24 total plays (16 rushes). They gained 111 yards. Conversely, the Bengals offense ran 34 total plays and won the time of possession battle at half-time (16:29-13:31). The score, at the time, was 7-6. However, in the second half, the Steelers ran a total of 36 total offensive plays (30 rushes, 6 passes). The Bengals offense had drives of plays of 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 7. Converting total plays to time of possession, that translates to 1:55, 1:09, 1:32, 1:46, 0:46, 0:55. The Bengals total second half time of possession was 8:02 -- the other 21:58 the Bengals defense was struggling to grab air between pounding Bettis runs, and exhausting Parker scats. I'm not going to point fingers to one side or the other, but the crap the Bengals defensive line is getting is not justified. If we blame people, we blame the offense (lack of drives, sloppy play), the defense (for not making big stops), special teams (missed FG, Kickoff out of bounds), and the coaches for getting the team "ready" for this result. Like I said, this to me, was the worst team effort of the season. Not a single unit, player, or coach (creativeness finding offensive plays, or defensive schemes to stop Pittsburgh's running game), stepped up and for that, they all deserve the blame. I think you and I can agree on that Army. (this has to be post of the year... ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Kirk, couldn't have said it better. I have calmed a bit from my original tirade of hatred and anger. I'm now down to disappointment in the "team" effort and am looking for a great rebound against the cheeseheads !!! Some of the hurtin' sure will go away after beating the Pack, laying an a**whoopin on the Ratbirds, and going 7-2 into the bye week !!!WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Allow me to say that I think it is way too early to talk about next year... when we have a new D coordinator, and a rookie MLB that is still learning the ropes. I think we are well on our way to being a very good playoff team... but for the purpose of conversation... Here's a list of the SS's and D-linemen with four years or more of experience who aren't under contract for 2006. It doesn't take into account voidable years or team options to extend contracts into 2006. (I don't take credit for this research. I found it on another board and deleted all non-SS/D-linemen)First, lets look at the Bengals, and who we'll need to resign...Rashad Bauman CB Jon Kitna QB Nick Luchey FB Anthony Mitchell FS Reggie Myles FS Hannibal Navies LB Ifeayani Ohelate SS Carl Powell DE Matt Schobel TE Tony Stewart TE Kenny Watson RB Nate Webster LB Marcus Wilkins LB Now everyone else's D-linemen and SS'sBaltimore Ravens Ma'ake Kemoeatu DT Anthony Weaver DE Chad Williams SS Buffalo Bills Justin Bannan DT Ryan Denney DE Ron Edwards DT Cleveland Browns Antwan Harris S Orpheus Roye DE Denver Broncos Sam Brandon SS Marco Coleman DE Monsanto Pope DT Indianapolis Colts Raheem Brock DE Larry Tripplett DT Jacksonville Jaguars Deke Cooper SS Rob Meier DT Marcellus Wiley DE Kansas City Chiefs Lional Dalton DT New England Patriots Michael Stone SS New York Jets John Abraham DE James Reed DT Oakland Raiders Jarrod Cooper SS Ed Jasper DT Kenny Smith DT Pittsburgh Steelers Kimo Von Oelhoffen DE San Diego Chargers DeQuincy Scott DE Tennessee Titans Otis Leverette DE Kyle Vanden Bosch DE Tank Williams SS Arizona Cardinals Russell Davis NT Atlanta Falcons Erik Flowers DE Ronnie Heard SS Carolina Panthers Idrees Bashir S Marlon McCree SS Kemp Rasmussen DE Chicago Bears Bobby Gray S Dallas Cowboys Eric Ogbogu DE/OLB Detroit Lions Jared DeVries DE Kalimba Edwards DE Bracy Walker S Green Bay Packers Grady Jackson DT Aaron Kampman DE Earl Little S Minnesota Vikings Corey Chavous SS Lance Johnstone DE Willie Offord SS New Orleans Saints Darren Howard DE Willie Whitehead DT New York Giants Kendrick Clancy DT Philadelphia Eagles N.D. Kalu DE Juqua Thomas DE San Francisco 49ers Travis Hall DE Seattle Seahawks Rodney Bailey DE Rocky Bernard DT John Howell S Marquand Manuel S Joe Tafoya DE St. Louis Rams Adam Archuleta SS Tyoka Jackson DT Damione Lewis DT Ryan Pickett NT Tampa Bay Buccaneers Chris Hovan DT Ellis Wyms DT Washington Redskins Ryan Clark SS Demetric Evans DE If you want the entire list, I found it through Google. Here is it:http://boards.giants.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=68615 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMC Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 The only two players on your list of Bengals I would resign are Kitna and Myles....But that is not feasible, need more of them signed of course....Need to wrap up Steinbach and Levi...other than that there could be a large amount of turnover on this team on DL and S... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Kirk, this is not one I'm willing to sit by on at all. While I understand and agree to an extent with what you are saying, if the D would make a stop in the second half, they would have gotten off the field. I agree the offense didn't help in this matter in going 3 and out or turnovers, but when turnovers happen, the D has to respond. They responded by getting ran the F**K over. God knows there is enough blame to go around, but God I hate our run defense so much, I've been looking for small animals or children to kick all day !!!WHODEY !!!Oh, I agree, the defense didn't do the team any good by letting Parker, Bettis, and Haynes run over them. I'm not arguing that at all. This was, by far, the worst team effort by the team. I won't argue that point at all. But for the sake of keeping the discussion going, look at it this way:In the first half, the Pittsburgh offense averaged 4.7 yards per rush. In comparison, the Steelers offense averaged 4.7 yards in the second half. No difference. In the first half, the Steelers offense ran 24 total plays (16 rushes). They gained 111 yards. Conversely, the Bengals offense ran 34 total plays and won the time of possession battle at half-time (16:29-13:31). The score, at the time, was 7-6. However, in the second half, the Steelers ran a total of 36 total offensive plays (30 rushes, 6 passes). The Bengals offense had drives of plays of 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 7. Converting total plays to time of possession, that translates to 1:55, 1:09, 1:32, 1:46, 0:46, 0:55. The Bengals total second half time of possession was 8:02 -- the other 21:58 the Bengals defense was struggling to grab air between pounding Bettis runs, and exhausting Parker scats. I'm not going to point fingers to one side or the other, but the crap the Bengals defensive line is getting is not justified. If we blame people, we blame the offense (lack of drives, sloppy play), the defense (for not making big stops), special teams (missed FG, Kickoff out of bounds), and the coaches for getting the team "ready" for this result. Like I said, this to me, was the worst team effort of the season. Not a single unit, player, or coach (creativeness finding offensive plays, or defensive schemes to stop Pittsburgh's running game), stepped up and for that, they all deserve the blame. I think you and I can agree on that Army. (this has to be post of the year... )I don't want this to get lost in the shuffle.What kirk said. All of it. Agree 100%.When I look back on that game, it is the offenses' short-comings that pain me the most. By far. That's because I, like joisey and a few others, expect this team to get carried by the offense. The offense instead hung the D out to dry in the second half, and this D isn't good enough to have that happen to it for prolonged stretches. When it does, they get beat. Period.Here's an idle wonder. 1st and 10 after James' big interception gives the Bengals the ball and momentum at mid-field. How about NOT a stretch running play to Perry. How about something to Carson to keep pressure on the Steelers? Stupid sequence from Brat. Perry for a three yard loss. Rudi up gut for five. Now a testy third and 8 with the Steelers thinking they can avoid disaster. Then interception. Bad sequence. Really bad. Set the tone for the second half. And it got worse from there offensively. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 The only two players on your list of Bengals I would resign are Kitna and Myles....But that is not feasible, need more of them signed of course....Need to wrap up Steinbach and Levi...other than that there could be a large amount of turnover on this team on DL and S...Well, you either have to resign one of the TE's, or go get one through the draft or free agency. I imagine one of them will be back.I'd also keep Ohalete because he's cheap, and he is decent insurance. Watson for the same reason. We have a lot of money free right now... so I expect a couple extensions on the O-line... but now that we've erased the losing stigma... it's time to get a real free agent. Hovan is over-hyped... and is over-priced as such. I'm also not someone who knows follows other teams well enough to know how good some of these guys are... but Triplett (DT) from Ind, Abraham (DE) from NYJ, and Chavous (SS) from Min would all be huge in our transformation.Here's an idle wonder. 1st and 10 after James' big interception gives the Bengals the ball and momentum at mid-field. How about NOT a stretch running play to Perry. How about something to Carson to keep pressure on the Steelers? Stupid sequence from Brat. Perry for a three yard loss. Rudi up gut for five. Now a testy third and 8 with the Steelers thinking they can avoid disaster. Then interception. Bad sequence. Really bad. Set the tone for the second half. And it got worse from there offensively.I was thinking the exact same thing. An opportunity to make up for the missed opportunities in the first half... and we simply missed another opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walshfan Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Keith Blue in Round Two!has a nice ring to it!Gee if they draft Greg Blue SS Georgia to go along with KEITH they'd have the Blues Bros!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cincy9275 Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 everyone is going in to long rants about why our d can't stop the run. the reason is we don't have a very good front seven period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalPappaw Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 I apologize if what I'm about to say was already said in this string -- I just didn't have the patience to read them all.I did have the patience and stomach to watch the tape of the Steelers game and there was one glaring problem. Our front 4 can NOT get off blocks. That is consistent with what I've seen a few of you say -- i.e. we are NOT good enough up front.In contrast the Steelers were able to slip our blocks and make tackles.Marvin may be right that smaller, quick Defensive lineman are better than fat, slugs -- BUT those "quick, smaller" lineman MUST be able to get off blocks and make plays.If we draft or get a D-lineman in FA, we must get one that can get off blocks and then make plays.Okay pass the Kool Aid, I'm ready to play Green Bay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Keith Blue in Round Two!has a nice ring to it!Gee if they draft Greg Blue SS Georgia to go along with KEITH they'd have the Blues Bros!!!!!Uh why was I thinking it was Keith blue? *smack* I meant Greg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 There does not seem to be a good DT in the draft or SS.Seriously? You're kidding right? Maybe you were talking about last year... in which case you are right. However, 2006 is loaded.Rod Wright 6-5, 305 TexasJesse Maholena 6-2, 300 Tennessee Kyle Williams 6-2, 295 LSUHaloti Ngata 6-4, 345 OregonRod Wright 6-5, 305 TexasGabe Watson 6-3, 330 Michigan All these guys have been projected to go in one experts mind or another. Not to mention guys likeOrien Harris 6-2, 300 MiamiJonathan Lewis 6-1, 310 Virginia Tech One of them will drop to us for sure. As for SS, I agree. There isn't anything 1st round worthy... but it's also not our primary need. Our secondary has played very well. Next year Madieu will be back, and KK has played much better than anyone thought. He's not a pro-bowler... but we don't need to use a 1st rounder there.I've been a big Thornton supporter... but the combination of him and Robinson hasn't done much to stop the run the past few games. I don't know if it is them, or the system, or what... but something's got to change. My guess is we get one of the more beefy DT's late in the first round... Whether we go to a 3-4, or just just move Robinson over, I don't know. I'd be fine with either... but next year, the run defense problems will be a distant memory. I believe it.Haloti Ngata 6-4, 345 Oregon is a beast and should be a future bengal someone that big and still be fast gotta get this guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Haloti Ngata 6-4, 345 Oregon is a beast and should be a future bengal someone that big and still be fast gotta get this guy.It's hard to predict this early how any given draft will go... it's still mid-season...no combine yet... all of that, but if what the current projections hold any water, there is no way he will drop to us. We are a playoff team... and even if we miss the playoffs, we'll still get a late first round pick... and he's projected everywhere I look to go in the top 15. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 While I'd welcome a DT or two next April...if that's all we do it isn't going to be enough. That's build-for-the-future stuff, which has to be done, but the Bengals need immediate impact on the d-line. The Bengals are going to have to get serious about a top FA DT. No more Thorntons and Robinsons but a Corey Simon type of player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkendall Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 While I'd welcome a DT or two next April...if that's all we do it isn't going to be enough. That's build-for-the-future stuff, which has to be done, but the Bengals need immediate impact on the d-line. The Bengals are going to have to get serious about a top FA DT. No more Thorntons and Robinsons but a Corey Simon type of player.Fair enough Joisey... name your man. Of the DT's that are not currently under contract for 2006:Baltimore Ravens Ma'ake Kemoeatu DT Buffalo Bills Justin Bannan DT Ron Edwards DT Denver Broncos Monsanto Pope DT Indianapolis Colts Larry Tripplett DT Jacksonville Jaguars Rob Meier DT Kansas City Chiefs Lional Dalton DT New York Jets James Reed DT Oakland Raiders Ed Jasper DT Kenny Smith DT Arizona Cardinals Russell Davis NT Green Bay Packers Grady Jackson DT New Orleans Saints Willie Whitehead DT New York Giants Kendrick Clancy DT Seattle Seahawks Rocky Bernard DT St. Louis Rams Tyoka Jackson DT Damione Lewis DT Ryan Pickett NT Tampa Bay Buccaneers Chris Hovan DT Ellis Wyms DTBunch a winners in there, huh? In fact, I can't find a single name that is ranked in the top 25 anywhere. However, there are several big name DT's in the draft this coming year (and I think that guys like Madieu Williams, Landon Johnson, and Odell Thurman would bristle at your statement that a rookie won't make an immediate impact). Maybe the way to go is to draft a big DT... maybe even trade up to get a really good one... and use that FA money to get one of the big name DE's like Marcellus Wiley, or John Abraham, or Kyle Vanden Bosch, or Darren Howard... you get the idea... there a a ton of DE's in the top 25 that my hit the FA market this year. Just a thought...Fair point though Kirk. That is next year talk... and I think we can win this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirkendall Posted October 25, 2005 Report Share Posted October 25, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.