Irish Bengal Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 I hated Crenzel but the more I see him the more I like him. Bramlet doesn't look very good. I know he hasn't got alot of playing time this preseason. I thought he looked bad in NFL Europe long before his WRs got hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Bengal Posted August 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 My bad Krenzel with a "K" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DontPushMe Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Man this poll gets better every time its posted!And here i thought the one posted 5 days ago was good... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyline Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 I'll take Bramlet.Our coaches have worked on him for a couple of years now. He showed he can play in NFL Europe, so I think he's a capable #3. He would also come at a cheaper price than Krenzel, right? I guess the other side is that Kitna won't be here forever, and maybe you see Krenzel as a solid #2, whereas Bramlet may not be able to fill that role.I can't say myself, since I'm not able to watch the preseason games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who? Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 Krenzel would be your best bet I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshall Law Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 I think we stick with Bramlet...Krenzel is very smart, but not much of an athlete. It seems like his head gets in the way of his instincts(if he has any)whenever a tough play is needed. I think someday Krenzel will be a really good coach in the NFL, but I don't think he'll ever be more than an over-achieving colleg player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted August 25, 2005 Report Share Posted August 25, 2005 I went with Krenzel, but would like to see more playing time from both in the last 2 games to be sure who is better with the offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sportsdoc Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Krenzel looks better. But neither one seems to great against a # 1 defense. Thought Bramlet looked better early in NFL Europe but really did worse as time went on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbx182 Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 bramlett. saw krenzel throw 2 picks to odell in practice. couldn't hit the corner of the endzone, either. in this offense you better be able to throw, so i'd take the cowboy over the buckeye, on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Krenzel looks better. But neither one seems to great against a # 1 defense. Thought Bramlet looked better early in NFL Europe but really did worse as time went on.  bramlett. saw krenzel throw 2 picks to odell in practice. couldn't hit the corner of the endzone, either. in this offense you better be able to throw, so i'd take the cowboy over the buckeye, on this one. Alright! Two new members here I see. Welcome to the 'Zone Sportsdoc and jbx182! (Why did I want to say "blink" there? ) Anyway I think this poll should have a third option called "Six of one and a half dozen of the other. It doesn't matter." If things get so bad that we've already gone through Palmer and Kitna, my brains would be laying on the floor on one side of me, and a smoking .45 automatic on the other!Ain't no Sportsdoc in the world gonna fix that football related injury! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DontPushMe Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Either one of them could start for 31 teams in the NFL but i think Bramlet is a bit better! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalindian Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 If things get so bad that we've already gone through Palmer and Kitna, my brains would be laying on the floor on one side of me, and a smoking .45 automatic on the other! Billy! Don't be scaring the kids away!I'm gonna be a doctor someday, and it'd be damn hard to bring you back to life for '06 when they don't disappoint for sure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalszoneBilly Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Billy! Don't be scaring the kids away!I'm gonna be a doctor someday, and it'd be damn hard to bring you back to life for '06 Ahhh! Nuthin' a bit of high voltage wouldn't cure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swordman Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 i voted bramlet even if everything seem to show that they are going to keep krenzel...krenzel has nfl starting XP( ok he suck but e was o rookie) whereas bramlet has nfle starting XP (and i am not sure but sucked too isn't he???)bramlet is a ohio local guy so it is good for the fanbut there are two things that are good for bramlet1- he knows the system2- he is willing play in nfle ( i heard that krenzel refused and that is why he has been cut)So i guess it wil come down to the one who will pay better in preseason...by the way the poll is stuck at 50-50 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StripesNTn Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 2- he is willing play in nfle ( i heard that krenzel refused and that is why he has been cut) That has been disputed. Krenzel claims they didn't ask hi mtil last minute. His word against theirs. However from what i have seen , Krenzel has had the better preseason, dont know about practices. Krenzel is a proven winner, a plus around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottishbengal Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Does it matter? When was the last time a 3rd stringer took the field? (I have every confidence that out there in cyberville some stat-hound will come up with the answer and shoot me down in flames) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Does it matter? When was the last time a 3rd stringer took the field? (I have every confidence that out there in cyberville some stat-hound will come up with the answer and shoot me down in flames) Last year in Chicago? Wasn't Krenzel third string? Last year in Cleveland? Didn't the skidmarks go through Garci and Holcomb pretty quickly and go to a horrible rookie later in the season? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABengalsFan09 Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Does it matter? When was the last time a 3rd stringer took the field?Jeff Blake anyone???????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet23 Posted August 26, 2005 Report Share Posted August 26, 2005 Krenzel is a better game than practice qb. I believe they are grooming him to be the #2 next season. By then, the defense will be a force and able to carry the team as long as the qb doesn't screw it up. Ala T. Dilfer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.