Jump to content

How big of an issue is this ??


ArmyBengal

Recommended Posts

Bengals | L. Johnson Injury Update - 26 Feb 2005

Mark Curnutte, of the Cincinnati Enquirer, reports Cincinnati Bengals LB Landon Johnson (shoulder) has undergone shoulder surgery and has yet to be cleared to participate in offseason workouts later this year. Head coach Marvin Lewis expressed uncertainty on when Johnson would be able to return.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bengals | Concerned with Webster's Rehab - 26 Feb 2005

Mark Curnutte, of the Cincinnati Enquirer, reports the Cincinnati Bengals have expressed concern over the rehabilitation of LB Nate Webster (knee), who suffered a season-ending knee injury early last season. "He's not healthy right now," Lewis said. "Until he's back 100 percent, we're concerned."

I don't know about you, but the thought of the possibility of both of these guys being hurt does not bode well for our running game. Maybe we didn't bode anyway, but just food for thought. IMHO, this HAS to be a HUGE concern for ML and if not addressed, another 8-8 at best coming our way.

WHODEY !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why Kevin Hardy hasn't been cut yet, if our LB core was completely healthy (Webster and Abdullah on IR, plus Landon coming off shoulder surgery) then he would already be gone. As it stands right now, without Hardy we wouldn't have enough LB's to practice effectively in spring mini-camps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think that this would be a good reason to look into a LB at 17. We could fill our needs on the D-line in rounds 2-4 (with a C somewhere in there), but with so many LBs hurt I wouldn't mind snagging one in the first.

I wouldn't have minded it even without the injuries, but it looks like the need might be pressing.

If only Derrick Johnson made it to #17...oh...oh God... :player: :player: :player: :player:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only Derrick Johnson made it to #17...oh...oh God... :player: :player: :player: :player:

He probly will, and i think theres a good chance if he is there at 17, we dont pick him. IMO his value is mid-late 1st round. He will probly go higher because of reputation, and this being a weak draft class, but i wouldnt consider him a good pick before 20. I said this last year about Steven Jackson and no one believed me, but i was right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DPM, what is your thing with Jackson? Did he not sign an autograph for you or something? He is one of the more promising young RBs in the NFL, and you have some vendetta against him that I don't understand. Or were you just stating that he wasn't a good pick before #20 last year? Because if memory serves me correctly, there weren't really any teams in the top 20 last year who had a pressing need at RB.

And I haven't seen any reports or projections that don't have Johnson rated as the best LB in the draft or have him going lower than 15th, so I don't understand how you see him not getting taken until the late-1st. If Johnson is there at 17, I think he'll be a Bengal, but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DPM, what is your thing with Jackson? Did he not sign an autograph for you or something? He is one of the more promising young RBs in the NFL, and you have some vendetta against him that I don't understand.  Or were you just stating that he wasn't a good pick before #20 last year? Because if memory serves me correctly, there weren't really any teams in the top 20 last year who had a pressing need at RB.

And I haven't seen any reports or projections that don't have Johnson rated as the best LB in the draft or have him going lower than 15th, so I don't understand how you see him not getting taken until the late-1st.  If Johnson is there at 17, I think he'll be a Bengal, but that's just me.

Unlike you guys i dont base my opinions on a player off of fansites or how i feel about the player personally. What i saw in Jackson was an average starter at best, personally i wouldnt of drafted him last year untill the 2nd round if it was my team, i would of drafted either jones, perry, or bell before him. And sure he had good stats this year, but if you watched his games, he wasnt impressive at all. He looks slow, upright, and his large runs all game with big holes to run through.

And there were no teams above 24 that needed RB? Could of fooled me, Raiders, Cardnals, Lions, Eagles, Cowboys, Bucs, Broncos all had picks before 24 and needed RB. They simply didnt want jackson.

As for Johnson, you misread my post. I said that I wouldnt take him before the late 1st round. I expect him to be picked somewhere in the mid first based on his reputation/hype and it being a weak draft class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there were no teams above 24 that needed RB? Could of fooled me, Raiders, Cardnals, Lions, Eagles, Cowboys, Bucs, Broncos all had picks before 24 and needed RB. They simply didnt want jackson.

Not to mention the Bengals. But i'm sure if last year's draft was done over he wouldnt stay on the board until 24th let alone past the top 15...he showed potential to be a great back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there were no teams above 24 that needed RB? Could of fooled me, Raiders, Cardnals, Lions, Eagles, Cowboys, Bucs, Broncos all had picks before 24 and needed RB. They simply didnt want jackson.

Not to mention the Bengals. But i'm sure if last year's draft was done over he wouldnt stay on the board until 24th let alone past the top 15...he showed potential to be a great back.

I mean, yeah, now that you've seen what he's done for the year.

Hindsight is 20/20.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember this name: Alfred Fincher MLB- he could be taken in later rounds

and turn into a reliablle MLB... Allot of scouts are high on him.. Nothing spectacular just reliable MLB.....

WOW. Someone knows who Alfred Fincher is.

Alfred Fincher went to UConn (aka the University I attend). I watched him all year, and the man is a beast. He had huge games in all of UConn's big games (17 tackles against Pitt, 21 tackles against WVU). Definitely a low profile guy that I thought all year could make an impact in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there were no teams above 24 that needed RB? Could of fooled me, Raiders, Cardnals, Lions, Eagles, Cowboys, Bucs, Broncos all had picks before 24 and needed RB. They simply didnt want jackson.

Not to mention the Bengals. But i'm sure if last year's draft was done over he wouldnt stay on the board until 24th let alone past the top 15...he showed potential to be a great back.

I mean, yeah, now that you've seen what he's done for the year.

Hindsight is 20/20.

I disagree completely. In fact i think if the draft were done over again, jackson would be picked lower then 26. Probly into the early/mid 2nd round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like the topic says, "Sick of the WR, RB talk" but we still manage to talk about that s**t. <_<:angry: Oh well, so much for trying. :wacko:

WHODEY !!!

It's the off season my man. The rules run fast and loose on topics this time of year. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like the topic says, "Sick of the WR, RB talk" but we still manage to talk about that s**t.  <_<  :angry:  Oh well, so much for trying.  :wacko:

WHODEY !!!

It's the off season my man. The rules run fast and loose on topics this time of year. ;)

Hey, do you guys like ice cream? I love ice cream. Butter Pecan is my favorite.

Wait, what were we talking about? Oh, we don't need a RB. I think we're pretty much set up there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just like the topic says, "Sick of the WR, RB talk" but we still manage to talk about that s**t.   <_<  :angry:   Oh well, so much for trying.   :wacko:

WHODEY !!!

It's the off season my man. The rules run fast and loose on topics this time of year. ;)

Hey, do you guys like ice cream? I love ice cream. Butter Pecan is my favorite.

I'm more of a chocolate chip cookie dough man, myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...