HoosierCat Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 Per Dehner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted February 27, 2015 Report Share Posted February 27, 2015 these two moves, unlike the Pollak move, at least make sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GapControl Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 Cincinnati avoided incurring any penalties (dead money) on Robert Geathers' $3.05 million cap number in 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GapControl Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 So with Pollak gone the bengals have added about 5 mill to the cap? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottishbengal Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 Geathers going cannot be a shock to anyone. I must admit to being a wee bit surprised at Little (one eyebrow half raised) as the WR corps isn't the deepest. Admittedly Little wasn't a stud but he did have a good game (against Balti or Cleveland I think) which showed he had some ability.Move towards the running game wouldn't have helped his cause and the Bengals do like drafting wideouts hence only the one eyebrow half raised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combatbengal Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 I'd like to see Gresham and Tate released! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted February 28, 2015 Report Share Posted February 28, 2015 Geathers shouldn't really surprise, but he represents the type of guy they have kept around longer than they should have.Good luck to him moving forward and thanks for what he did give to the team.Greg Little ?? Who ??Yeah, i'm good with that.Pollak really shouldn't be that much of a surprise when considering his knees.I'm just of the line of thought that the team knows more about his medical condition than we do.Gresham is a free agent. We would have to sign him to release him, but yeah, I don't want him back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted March 1, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2015 I'd like to see Gresham and Tate released!They're both free agents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combatbengal Posted March 2, 2015 Report Share Posted March 2, 2015 Let em both go to other teams! Gresham drives me nuts. When he plays, he either get us a 15 yard penalty of fumbles the ball! Tate can't catch and on kick returns he makes horrible decisions- no wonder NE let him go!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passepartout Posted March 2, 2015 Report Share Posted March 2, 2015 Maybe they are trying to make room. For the cap and save some money. Along with being FA's are the concerns and the causes for releasing them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.