ArmyBengal Posted March 22, 2008 Report Posted March 22, 2008 How about titles for that new playbook involving the TE's ??"TE's and You, How to Coexist""Using TE's for Dummies""Don't Be So God D*mned Predictable"Anyway, I like the signing, but I hate the concept of thinking all we need is a RB to complete the offense. Don't get me wrong, I would love to have that stellar RB for Carson, but until the defense can put pressure on an opposing QB, we could only hope to win all games in a shootout. Refresh my memory again and tell me how the first Cleveland game went again last season ??WHODEY !!! Quote
rwalling Posted March 22, 2008 Report Posted March 22, 2008 Someone needs to e-mail Bob Bratkowski and let him know he needs to download an update for his playbook.Title it "The TE position is now a good option. Use it!!"Is he clear that the TE is an eligible receiver yet?! Quote
BengalszoneBilly Posted March 22, 2008 Report Posted March 22, 2008 Someone needs to e-mail Bob Bratkowski and let him know he needs to download an update for his playbook.Title it "The TE position is now a good option. Use it!!"Is he clear that the TE is an eligible receiver yet?!Doubtful, and I expect this same time next year members here will be clamoring for another alleged impact TE that Brat won't call plays for. Call it the circle of life. Quote
Ox Posted March 22, 2008 Report Posted March 22, 2008 So I've waited all day.. and still no mysterious fax at 11:59:59 from the Colts matching? Is this the twilight zone or something? Quote
rwalling Posted March 23, 2008 Report Posted March 23, 2008 Someone needs to e-mail Bob Bratkowski and let him know he needs to download an update for his playbook.Title it "The TE position is now a good option. Use it!!"Is he clear that the TE is an eligible receiver yet?!Doubtful, and I expect this same time next year members here will be clamoring for another alleged impact TE that Brat won't call plays for. Call it the circle of life.That or clamoring for a new OC...again. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 23, 2008 Report Posted March 23, 2008 Anyway, I like the signing, but I hate the concept of thinking all we need is a RB to complete the offense. Nope, the memo I found in my mailbox yesterday morning says the Bengals need a new starting RB, a new OT, a new and more powerful OC, a new #3 wideout to push Henry, a new #2 wideout to replace the aging Housh, and a new #1 wideout to replace Chad. So greedy. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.