ArmyBengal Posted June 20, 2007 Report Share Posted June 20, 2007 The Browns don't have any business in the top three in any of these catagories. Not even Jamal Lewis... So sorry for the Turds !!!WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengal4life Posted June 20, 2007 Report Share Posted June 20, 2007 Depth chart Offensive skill positions AFCNQB#1 Palmer#2 Big Ben#3 McNairRB#1 Rudi#2 Mcgahee#3 ParkerWR#1 Ocho Cinco#2 TJ#3 WardmoronActually I have to agree with him, except for the fact that I believe Willie is better than Willis. Other than that he is pretty accurate. The browns aren't on here because their posistion players suck.QB#1 Palmer#2 Big Ben#3 McNairRB#1 Parker#2 Johnson#3 McGahee WR#1 Johnson#2 Hines Ward#3 TJ.Parker has never quite shown he is capable of anything other than a few big games every year. Mcgahee is going to bring the Ravens running game back to respectability and Johnson is one of the most consistent backs in the league.Ward was better than TJ, a couple of seasons ago, but TJ has passed him like he was standing still since.Name calling is the last resort of an uninformed mind.Agreed on the TJ and Hines subject. TJ had 100 yards more than Ward last season and he is our #2.TJ = 1081Ward = 975 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 I sure hope someone else block quotes that block quote... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted June 21, 2007 Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 I sure hope someone else block quotes that block quote...Huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ox Posted June 21, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2007 I sure hope someone else block quotes that block quote...Huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dez0923 Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 To whomever said that I was uninformed, 6 Willie Parker PIT 1494 337 4.4 13 767 Rudi Johnson CIN 1309 341 3.8 12 22200 more yards on less carries for Parker. . . . nuff said on that matter. 16 T.J. Houshmandzadeh CIN 90 1081 12.0 9 21 Hines Ward PIT 74 975 13.2 6 not to mention the fact that TJ is opposite Chad Johnson. . one of the better WR in the league, and Hines is basically by himself. . . and Roethlisberger had a s**tty year. . . . oh, and Hines is the best blocking WR in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 To whomever said that I was uninformed, 6 Willie Parker PIT 1494 337 4.4 13 767 Rudi Johnson CIN 1309 341 3.8 12 22200 more yards on less carries for Parker. . . . nuff said on that matter. 16 T.J. Houshmandzadeh CIN 90 1081 12.0 9 21 Hines Ward PIT 74 975 13.2 6 not to mention the fact that TJ is opposite Chad Johnson. . one of the better WR in the league, and Hines is basically by himself. . . and Roethlisberger had a s**tty year. . . . oh, and Hines is the best blocking WR in the league.With Rudi and Parker, you have to look at more than one season to make a valid comparison. Parker looks like he's set to be a very good player in Pittsburgh, but he has yet to become the model of consistency that is Rudi Johnson. Still, the two are very close IMO.I do agree that Hines is a better receiver than T.J. though. He's been consistent for longer with less offense around him and an inferior quarterback (both Maddox and Roethlisberger). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dez0923 Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 HEYYYY! Someone said something intelligent here without insulting me/Pittsburgh/Pennsylvania Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 HEYYYY! Someone said intelligent here with insulting me/Pittsburgh/Pennsylvania????????Your a strange ranger dez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 This is why I think Rudi is a little better back than Willie(and also why Mcgahee will be better this season)2006 statsWillie's 5 lowest games 11-2010-2213-2916-4620-47Rudi's 5 lowest games12-4619-4716-4713-4717-52Sure Willie had a couple of big games (22-213 NO and 32-223 CLE) but he was unable to carry his weight in others. You cannot have a starting RB get less than 30 yards 3 times in a season, it makes you to 1 dimensional.IMO a RB that will give you almost 50 yards on a bad day is much better than an inconsistent one.As for your comparison of TJ and Ward, you proved my point with your stats thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.