schweinhart Posted March 18, 2007 Report Share Posted March 18, 2007 Any QB worth a salt shreds a zone with the kind of time the Bengals 4-man rush gives them. Man up and free some blitz to get more pressure. Okoye would at least be a pass rushing DT, which is compelling, but if that's all he is -- which is all he has been so far -- then they can use the 1st on a player they can get more out of who can stay on the field all downs or at least allow the Bengals to scheme beter with pressure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted March 18, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 18, 2007 Any QB worth a salt shreds a zone with the kind of time the Bengals 4-man rush gives them. Man up and free some blitz to get more pressure. Okoye would at least be a pass rushing DT, which is compelling, but if that's all he is -- which is all he has been so far -- then they can use the 1st on a player they can get more out of who can stay on the field all downs or at least allow the Bengals to scheme better with pressure.And that, in an excellent nutshell, is why I can believe Marvin has a huge man-crush on Amobi Okoye. The Bengals under Marvin aren't going to man up; he is not going to give up his reliance on the front four to create pressure, any more than Mikey is going to suddenly run out and throw $60m - $80m at some outside FA. We had a DC who used to try to "man up" and he's now wearing an Indianapolis SB ring.In short, Marvin (and his yes-man, Breshnahan) will abandon their front-four-focused approach when someone pries it from their cold, dead hands.Now, I'm not saying its the right approach, only that it is. To me, the only question is whether their interest in Okoye is really just of the "gee, wouldn't it be nice if he fell to us?" variety -- or of a Mike Ditka-esque "I'll give up my whole draft for this guy" bent. I can actually see the latter. And in that case I could see a trade with the Bills at 12 (assuming Okoye does fall that far) of something like everything but our 6th for their 1st and 3rd. And the Bengals subsequently snatching Okoye at 12. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalmaniac Posted March 19, 2007 Report Share Posted March 19, 2007 Landry or Willis would be great if okoye is gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrod382 Posted March 19, 2007 Report Share Posted March 19, 2007 And that, in an excellent nutshell, is why I can believe Marvin has a huge man-crush on Amobi Okoye. The Bengals under Marvin aren't going to man up; he is not going to give up his reliance on the front four to create pressure, any more than Mikey is going to suddenly run out and throw $60m - $80m at some outside FA. We had a DC who used to try to "man up" and he's now wearing an Indianapolis SB ring.In short, Marvin (and his yes-man, Breshnahan) will abandon their front-four-focused approach when someone pries it from their cold, dead hands.Now, I'm not saying its the right approach, only that it is.Very well said. Unfortunately I guess you're right, I just wish Marvin would cave on that. We don't have a great front four, so I would like to see us improvise with what we have (Athletic LB's).Honestly, day by day I think it's becoming more and more likely that the Bucs take Okoye at #4 or maybe trade down to 7 or 8 and take him. He's a great DT for the Tampa 2 and Jon Gruden fell in love with him at the Senior Bowl, he had an obvious man crush on him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasher Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 Please, no more 5'9'' corners, I still have nightmares of seeing Bauman leaping in futility at Randel El's pass back to cheeseburger. Yeah, he may be fast and he may have been great in college, but at 5'9'' against NFL receivers? I will take Revis and his size and physicality, Nelson, Ross, Hall, Griffin or the Fresno State kid over 5'9'' ESPECIALLY in the 1st round at that kind of money for 4 or 5 years... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 And that, in an excellent nutshell, is why I can believe Marvin has a huge man-crush on Amobi Okoye. The Bengals under Marvin aren't going to man up; he is not going to give up his reliance on the front four to create pressure, any more than Mikey is going to suddenly run out and throw $60m - $80m at some outside FA. We had a DC who used to try to "man up" and he's now wearing an Indianapolis SB ring.In short, Marvin (and his yes-man, Breshnahan) will abandon their front-four-focused approach when someone pries it from their cold, dead hands.Now, I'm not saying its the right approach, only that it is.Very well said. Unfortunately I guess you're right, I just wish Marvin would cave on that. We don't have a great front four, so I would like to see us improvise with what we have (Athletic LB's). I'm not buying it. Lewis used a 1st round draft pick on a DE/OLB who was expected to fill the pass rushing Joker role for the next 6 or 7 years. All things considered I'd say that showed a pretty firm commitment to bringing consistent pass rush pressure from a position other than the front four. I've said it before and I'll say it again, far too many people underestimate what the loss of David Pollack meant to the Bengals scheme last season, and how badly it set back the plans Marvin had. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasher Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 Landry or Willis would be great if okoye is gone. You are talking about three top 10 or at worst top 15 players. No way they slip to us at 18, especially with all the teams ahead of us with the same or similar needs.Player Class Position School 1. Calvin Johnson JR WR Georgia TechThe best receiver prospect to come along in years and a physical freak. 2. Brady Quinn SR QB Notre DameA franchise signal caller who really has everything that you look for. 3. Joe Thomas SR OT WisconsinCould have been a Top 10 - 15 overall pick last year if not for injury. 4. JaMarcus Russell JR QB L.S.U.Total package physically and might have the strongest arm in football. 5. Adrian Peterson JR RB OklahomaTerrific physical specimen and a rare player but durability is a concern. 6. LaRon Landry SR S L.S.U.Ballhawk who has been extremely productive throughout his career. 7. Alan Branch JR DT MichiganVersatile and could play either tackle or end depending on the scheme. 8. Gaines Adams SR DE ClemsonSack artist who could rise if he picks up where he left off as a junior. 9. Amobi Okoye SR DT LouisvilleVery talented and unique prospect who will be a 20-year-old rookie.10. Jamaal Anderson JR DE ArkansasDoesn't get a lot of national attention but he is a premier pro prospect.11. Patrick Willis SR ILB Ole Miss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 I've said it before and I'll say it again, far too many people underestimate what the loss of David Pollack meant to the Bengals scheme last season, and how badly it set back the plans Marvin had."crys for pollack" hopfully brooks can be what pollack was suppossed to be.Please, no more 5'9'' corners, I still have nightmares of seeing Bauman leaping in futility at Randel El's pass back to cheeseburger. Yeah, he may be fast and he may have been great in college, but at 5'9'' against NFL receivers? I will take Revis and his size and physicality, Nelson, Ross, Hall, Griffin or the Fresno State kid over 5'9'' ESPECIALLY in the 1st round at that kind of money for 4 or 5 years...isen't el only 5'10 or 5'11? even if he's 6'0 it's no worse then 5'11 corner facing off against a 6'3+ WRplus Houston is just barley under 5'10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasher Posted March 31, 2007 Report Share Posted March 31, 2007 I've said it before and I'll say it again, far too many people underestimate what the loss of David Pollack meant to the Bengals scheme last season, and how badly it set back the plans Marvin had."crys for pollack" hopfully brooks can be what pollack was suppossed to be.Please, no more 5'9'' corners, I still have nightmares of seeing Bauman leaping in futility at Randel El's pass back to cheeseburger. Yeah, he may be fast and he may have been great in college, but at 5'9'' against NFL receivers? I will take Revis and his size and physicality, Nelson, Ross, Hall, Griffin or the Fresno State kid over 5'9'' ESPECIALLY in the 1st round at that kind of money for 4 or 5 years...isen't el only 5'10 or 5'11? even if he's 6'0 it's no worse then 5'11 corner facing off against a 6'3+ WRplus Houston is just barley under 5'10too bad those cookies he eated weren't wheaties! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 You guys can forget about Rd. 2, our pick in rd. 2 will be Justin Durant mark my words.If Nelson is there at 18 he is our pick, I love Okoye in a Bengals uniform but I think he'll go in the 9-13 range. I would pull a "Saints" deal to trade up to get Landry. My gut, Michael Griffin in Rd. 1 and Durant in Rd. 2. I hope Matt Spaeth falls to us in Rd. 4 if not him then Jay Alford. I like Garret Wolfe in Rd. 5 or Paul Soliai. And I love Ryne Robinson with the last pick in the 7th rd.BTW all this gets thrown out the window if Patrick Willis falls to us at 18, and I think there may be a possibility that Alan Branch falls alot farther than people think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat Bengal Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 You guys can forget about Rd. 2, our pick in rd. 2 will be Justin Durant mark my words.If Nelson is there at 18 he is our pick, I love Okoye in a Bengals uniform but I think he'll go in the 9-13 range. I would pull a "Saints" deal to trade up to get Landry. My gut, Michael Griffin in Rd. 1 and Durant in Rd. 2. I hope Matt Spaeth falls to us in Rd. 4 if not him then Jay Alford. I like Garret Wolfe in Rd. 5 or Paul Soliai. And I love Ryne Robinson with the last pick in the 7th rd.BTW all this gets thrown out the window if Patrick Willis falls to us at 18, and I think there may be a possibility that Alan Branch falls alot farther than people think.Ok, so what IF Branch falls to us?Do we still take Durant?I would be happy with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesperateDerelict Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 Actually, I care less about the 1st round pick than I do pick #2 => Zach Miller!! If he's there, we grab him, and we are right back to being one of the top 3 Offensive teams where we need to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.