BTG Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Joseph: 22Whitworth: 77Rucker: 92Peko: 94Nicholson: 52McNeal: 10 (interesting choice....)Kilmer: 43Brazell: 81 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Frostee got Duane's old number? Bad omen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GROIIIDayton Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 McNeal still thinks he is playing QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 McNeal still thinks he is playing QB.No, WR's can take numbers in the 10's as well. It just means he intentionally took a number that allows him to line up in different spots. He was probably told to do this so we can be tricky with him without drawing a penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GROIIIDayton Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Thanks for the update Derek but he could line up where ever they wanted him to with a number in the 80's also. I was just joking anyway I thought maybe Chris Henry was playing QB too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ29 Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 So much for Kilmer being a wide receiver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mondo Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 We can use the extra depth @saftey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Kilmer: 43Welcome Safety 4 or CB 5Peko should have got 69 his old number backwords + when he lines up next too fanene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 McNeal: 10 (interesting choice....) True, but McNeal getting #15 would have been even more interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derekshank Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 Thanks for the update Derek but he could line up where ever they wanted him to with a number in the 80's also. I was just joking anyway I thought maybe Chris Henry was playing QB too.Actually he would have to check in with the ref before the play if he wanted to line up at QB. This would give away any trickyness of such activity. Having a number in the 10's gives him the ability to move from WR to QB right before the snap, catching the defense off guard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 Thanks for the update Derek but he could line up where ever they wanted him to with a number in the 80's also. I was just joking anyway I thought maybe Chris Henry was playing QB too.Actually he would have to check in with the ref before the play if he wanted to line up at QB. This would give away any trickyness of such activity. Having a number in the 10's gives him the ability to move from WR to QB right before the snap, catching the defense off guard. I thought that was just for linemen. I've seen direct snaps to RB's without mention of having to check in. In fact I think PDub lined up at QB a couple of years ago and ran a play off-tackle. I've never heard of someone having to check in to play QB but I may be wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Aye and diden't hines or randle el get direct snap where big ben fa ked getting itEstandia, Greg is number 45 (damn wanted him be 89 )Only UDFA I care about so not gonna post the rest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 wasen't ghent 45? he's now 80 o_O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 wasen't ghent 45? he's now 80 o_O Way to respect P-dub, eh? Ronnie friggin' Ghent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 wonder if they gave him a number in the 80's because plan playing more where 40's like trial TE number PS,Cut tony now so Estandia can have his college number Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Speaking of rookie numbers, the rookie pool allocations are out. The Bengals' rookie pool is just a bit less than $3.7 million. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwalling Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 So much for Kilmer being a wide receiver.If he looks like a safety, and hits like a safety, chances are he's a... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 perk of him a safety is he trains on defense so his tackling doesn't go down hill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.