AMPHAR

Another good break down: https://www.si.com/nfl/bengals/news/film-breakdown-how-joe-burrow-bengals-offensive-line-handled-49ers-pass-rush

Maybe it is, but it shouldn't be. He avoided the huge INT game during the slow start that just sinks your rating. If he can start stacking good games he'll climb pretty fast. Mahomes the favorite is sitting sub 100 rating mostly due to 15-8 ratio.

Awesome job by Cappa not giving up and getting a chip on Bosa.

Bengals in a tight game. As long as the Bengals win, I would love a QB shootout on national TV. Get the Burrow MVP wagon going.

After the sack fumble it was awesome to see the coaches surround Lou and there was probably a few "F bombs", I'm guessing directed at the Ref for the previous roughing the passer. By the way; Has the league exempted Burrow from the roughing passer call? It looked like he took at least 1 head shot late and couple more hits were late in the pocket.

Pratt's interception was amazing. Wilson and Pratt locked up for a while is huge and will be for a while.

Just a huge win. Complete effort all the way around. Sunday Night Football match ups to this point have been blah, IMO. They are going to get a mega match up coming up.

The way I look at it. Its Zac and Burrow's job to put scoring pressure on the 9ers so eventually "staying on schedule" isn't adequate enough and then hopefully force some late mistakes. If the Bengals can't move the ball, grind out first downs and points then the 9ers regardless of QB will just dump it off. Punt if they have to and play ball for another time.

I'd rather face the struggling starter and a OC thats calling the game in a manner that assumes the struggling starter will eventually rebound. See our own Joe Burrow. Maybe Purdy would have gotten out of his funk vs. the Bengals. Maybe not. Now the 9er focus will be back to basics and protect the QB more. They can pound the rock well enough. Bengals offense must put the ball in the air and beat them over the head with Chase/Higgins and put scoring pressure on them. Otherwise the 9ers will just circle the wagons and eventually get enough from McAffery and Co. to squeak out a home win. Although Purdy wasn't as bad as Zac Wilson, but I would have rather faced him vs. Mike White (???) two years ago. Instead our defense just allowed to them to dink and dunk and the offense sputtered a little and they got the "L" on the road to a back up. By the way many thought the season was over after that weekend and especially after the next weekend. It wasn't and it won't be this weekend either. I think its going to be tough to win out there.

A 1 point ugly victory by the Bengals will be huge. They are 5.5 point road dogs right now. Which isn't the biggest dog in week 8 but that's not respect by any stretch.

9ers coming off 2 game road losing streak heading home with the bye week on the horizon is going to be very tough to deal with. Any sort of ugly win for the Bengals would be a huge positive indicator for the rest of the season. No matter what the injury report says the 9ers will be looking to right the ship at home before heading into the bye.

From the Caskey Clicker review on Sacks 1. Volson completely blown up 2. Miscommunication - maybe by Burrow missing the hot read or a WR missing the hot read. Maybe Williams taking inside and doing poor job. 3. Trap Pass - He highlighted a couple of these. They simply did a poor job of executing. 1. was tipped ball to an open chase (faulted Mixon) 2. One, if block better is a huge play to Irv Smith instead an outlet to Chase for a decent gain. 3. Sack. These are play action type looks with a pulling guard (Cappa), hard block to execute by Karras.

Teams are not going to get away from two deep coverage, rush 4. Until they can prove to grind out TD drive after TD drive. Although the Titans certainly brought pressure. The O-line isn't good enough to keep Burrow clean IF a team decides to loop and stunt with 4/5 rushers. Volson is a pass pro nightmare. Don't ever recall Carman being that big a liability. Burrow has not been accurate enough. Then Higgins, Smith, Brown whoever just simply are dropping balls, not making drive extending plays. Defense has been up and down through 6 games. A couple players certainly are having promising possible elite seasons. You have to trust these players/coaches perform up to their standard post bye week. Every AFC team except Patriots and Broncos survived the first 6 weeks. So just about every AFC team can make a case for improvement the remaining 12 weeks.

Seattle was probably a tougher team than I expected. They certainly aren't winning with style points at this moment. So I guess the good news is they are playing well below expectations and still in the thick of things. I think the tackling has been soft and even with a very strong defensive effort yesterday; opposing players seem to get 3/4 yards after first contact. The line's standard seems to be 2/3 sacks a game. Given the amount of effort to revamp the line, I would love for that drop post bye week.

Joe Burrow is dying for competent o-line coaching.

Pass on Hunter Henry. Hurst is probably more than what they want to spend on TE; they would have to keep his salary on the book next year as it guaranteed.

Way better. Alexander had multiple years allowing under 2 sack average. Pollack's line the way they are playing is going to get sniped for 5/6 sacks in a game eventually this year.

Its possible to have an explosive offense with 36 sacks, but given who they have up front, it'd be nice to have a week with 0. Feels like they are under performing especially at LG and RG. Alexander threw up multiple sub 30 sack years. Everyone hated him, now 36 is acceptable.

D-line not getting off blocks makes bad tackling get even worse. Caskey predicted teams would try to exploit what the Titans put on film and it looks like he's right. Bengals offense will need to put scoring pressure on the Seattle play callers. If it gets to a point were Seattle can just pound away then the Bengals D will give up rushing yards. Don't care how bad Giants line is or isn't. The 2/3 sack game is becoming the norm with Bengals line. At this point its unacceptable.

QB School and Caskey film reviews are awesome for this week. My thoughts are: 1. There's so much conjecture from guys that have been in NFL game plan meetings. PFF grades aren't worth a crap. 2. Major protection issues vs. Titans. Caskey goes into more detail trying to explain why. JT takes it at face value as being bad. Caskey found fault with RBs chipping or lack there of numerous times. Bottomline for me no matter what, it was bad. Caskey shows several deep play concepts that ultimately get undermined by bad pass protection. 3. Joe Burrow displays good mechanics sometimes. 4. Most interesting was Caskey/JT opinions on the near Red Zone Int. JT blames poor design/possible route error. Caskey basically blames Burrow. Pre Snap show Titans have 4 to cover 3 on both sides. That left middle wide open and along with no D-line in middle. Thought there should have been a check to QB draw up the middle. Also noted it appeared Irwin darting underneath into the middle was the key concept that Burrow missed/ignored or whatever. Thought this might be the same concept they used with Mixon in New Orleans to score a TD. Its interesting because you have two guys still into coaching/ton of NFL game film review experience, still having different takes on the same data. No way in hell PFF is accurate in anything.

Being Concerned and forcing an injured player to play are world's apart. The concern is driven by his performance in Nashville. That does not equate to Burrow being injured and needing rest. I have not been briefed on Burrow's status so my guess is worth a crap. I have seen the rehab process a bunch of times unfortunately. Stage 1 - Rest, isolate, immobilize - That 's when you see Boots, Crutches, Scooters, Braces Stage 2 - Once the injured area has reached a level of repair they stress the area to re gain basic functionality. You see alot of stretching bands in this stage. Stage 3 - Cleared to practice and the player is off trying to regain whatever performance attributes they lost. This is what Burrow addressed after the Rams game. There is always risk of re-injury but that does not mean Stage 1 gets them anywhere. If he's truly in Stage 3 taking reps off the calf may delay his return to the fans expectations. He probably needs reps and work. This is what it sounded like he was saying post Rams game.

That's not acknowledging anything about further injury. That actually states he'd have to suffer another injury. He's healed. He's played like crap as he tries to make up for missed practice time and regaining what ever physical abilities he lost while healing in training camp. At best they are 2-2 but I think you'd still have to work some magic thinking to sell that based on the defenses performance in two of those games.

Run/Pass ratio is predicated on the amount of RPOs they insert into the game plan and call through out the game. That puts the end result of that ratio partly on Burrow's post snap decisions. Burrow enjoys RPOs based on some previous post game comments. Draft a franchise QB. Pay a franchise QB. Expect a franchise QB to deliver results. He gets a tremendous amount of credit showing up at Jeff Ruby's with a Free Agent. Great amount of credit in a sub-par performance that results in a win. No blame. He hasn't played well in 3 of the 4 games. The 2nd game vs. Ravens is decent. Zac is accountable for never having an elite offense. Zac is accountable for the way this team enters the season. IMO. Suggesting the Bengals treat Burrow like Hue did Dalton in 2014, might work. But that offense was just mid pack and the defense was the catalyst for a playoff run. Zac Taylor pundits once criticized him for running against SF in OT even though Burrow was getting pounded. How dare he take the ball out his hands! Now there a vocal loud radio show filled with opinions blaming Zac for Burrow being on the field and not taking the ball out of his hands. Just shows the low level logic, IMO. Burrow would not be on the field if there was greater risk injury. Running the ball ala 2014 to save an under performing QB, might work. But how many people are willing to point out the under performing QB? Do the Bengals have the defense to get the job done? I still say revert to 2014 running the ball is only getting them 2-2 at best. Defense has only put a winning performance on the board twice this year. Jane's and Joe's matter more that X's and O's. Always. Teams would pay another position group if they could scheme their way past poor QB play.

Joe Burrow has simply sucked. The suggestion of "rest" is something to explain the unknown reason as to why. Then of course you need a "fall guy" to explain why "rest" isn't being done. "Rest" to me means "Injured". That is what happens after an injury. They throw in a boot, cast, brace, walk around on crutches or a scooter. Isolate it and heal it. Then there is a battery of exercises once healed enough used to make it functional. My guess Burrow passed all that stuff a while ago, but that doesn't mean you are 100% NFL level. "Rest" could be counter productive. Sure it would gives us a reason to explain a miserable season so far and allow us to wash away the reasons of losing to a singular failure point. But Burrow's comments after the Rams game and the fact they've said he's starting vs. Arizona and the history of this organization lean me towards believing there is nothing to be gained by "resting". There are similar thinking but different theories to explain Joe Burrow sucking. If there was some magical play call or offensive scheme to overcome a league worse QB play, then team's would not be spending $250m+ on QBs. QBs would be getting the RB treatment which most NFL front offices have made it clear RBs are a dime a dozen. The hard part is simply Joe Burrow needs to play better and yes he was dealt a bad hand again in training camp. An equally harder part to accept is even if Joe Burrow was average the best they probably would be is 2-2. As they weren't beating the Ravens or Titans with those defensive performances. An average Burrow may have beaten the Browns given the number of defensive stops. A below average Burrow did beat the Rams thanks to the defense.

IMO, rest solution from fans is more about their sensibilities in handling their disappointment of a season not working out they hoped. If there was something to be gained from resting then they would be doing it. I refuse to believe there is medical advice suggesting rest is the best solution and the Brown family is putting Burrow at risk and then Burrow's camp not leaking that info. Quite frankly, I believe if there was not medical advice of resting and Burrow's camp wanted to rest anyway then he would be resting. Conspiracy theories are great for message board conjecture, but the Brown family being evil owners treating their players as raw meat putting them through a grinder is something I've never heard of from them. There is a recent example of AJ Green wanting to play and Mike Brown saying no and then sending him home for Christmas. I doubt there is someone in that building with medical facts/opinion saying "rest" and the entire building is going against it.