vettespd20 Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 What the hell is up with all this talk about Chad being traded? They said Marvin is not saying yes or no which is not a good sign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnglsboi8532 Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Its crap! He's the best player at his position hands down IMO and if he's traded we will def. not get equal trade value! Unless its helps the team a lot, bc that's all that matters, Carson is the only untouchable player, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buck3y3d Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Its crap! He's the best player at his position hands down IMO and if he's traded we will def. not get equal trade value! Unless its helps the team a lot, bc that's all that matters, Carson is the only untouchable player, IMO.Steve Smith is better than Chad. That is just a fact. TJ takes a lot of pressure off Chad. Smith does it all by himself. Still, I want Chad on this team, and wouldn't trade him unless the return was great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Everytime I see this brought up, I will continue to say it's the stupidest thought ever conceived...WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Could swore marvin said He is not being traded and why would they trade him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Could swore marvin said He is not being traded and why would they trade him.All I heard was Marvin's standard 'I don't talk to the media, you wouldn't understand, yada yada.' Not the same as a denial, but not proof of anything either.In the end, even PFT made only a half-hearted report simply mentioning all the other rumors that are flying around. If PFT isn't even fanning the flames, there's probably nothing to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Hobson clears the air...from bengals.com:ESPN's Chris Mortensen doesn't think his report citing a prominent Bengals source on Sunday regarding Chad Johnson was misquoted, but he does think it was misinterpreted."There were two parts to it," Mortensen said Wednesday. "The first part dealt with the source saying that because of Chad's passion and pride, they have to figure out a way to deal with him. The second part was my analysis that the discussions could bring them to a crossroads and that could involve a trade. At no time did a Bengals source tell me they could possibly trade him."Hair will be bummed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 Hair will be bummed. Nope, Hair used a DVR to transcribe what Mort said word for word and as a result knew for certain what Mort's source claimed. And at no point did Mort or I ever state or even imply that the Bengals had considered a trade. But I would, and I'm not shy when offering a personal opinion. For example, more TJ. Less Chad. As for the the media, the trade talk that I've heard can be traced to several other sources, most notably by Adam Schefter of the NFL Network. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalByTheBay Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 But I would, and I'm not shy when offering a personal opinion.Do tell! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
COB Posted October 24, 2007 Report Share Posted October 24, 2007 quote name='HairOnFire' post='223348' date='Oct 24 2007, 06:53 PM'][ Nope, Hair used a DVR to transcribe what Mort said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted October 25, 2007 Report Share Posted October 25, 2007 Referring to yourself in the third person? Very Chad-like! Get back to me when I start wearing gold teef for no reason or oversized yellow sportscoats covered in felt lettering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.