Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I mentioned this in the other thread. He is probably not saying he didn't do it, but that he was not guilty of the charges against him. I believe it public intoxication, tresspassing, and resisting arrest. He could say he was not intoxicated, that what he did was not tresspassing, and he did not resist arrest (it was a security guard, not a police officer). Not saying he won't be found guilty in the end, but his plea of not guilty does not mean he is saying "that was not me."

Posted
I mentioned this in the other thread. He is probably not saying he didn't do it, but that he was not guilty of the charges against him. I believe it public intoxication, tresspassing, and resisting arrest. He could say he was not intoxicated, that what he did was not tresspassing, and he did not resist arrest (it was a security guard, not a police officer). Not saying he won't be found guilty in the end, but his plea of not guilty does not mean he is saying "that was not me."

Resisting arrest came when he gave the tubby a weak stiff arm and three of them crashed into each other when the Kamikazee tubalard security guy from the right completely misses the drunken fool. Security personnel or not, that action probably constitutes resisting arrest.

Running onto the field is trespassing.

And public intoxication was evident by his filmed behavior if combined with obvious drinking.

And it can all be backed up in hi-definition network broadcast replays.

Surely a judge would not let him off on technicalities if they want to continue their careers.

Posted

I can't believe this drunk actually has a fiancee. It's amazing what some women are willing to marry.

Apparently her and his family are incredibly embarrassed and ashamed. He also has a slightly separated shoulder from that hit and some other injury that he had to go to the hospital for after getting out of jail (some back injury).

Posted
I can't believe this drunk actually has a fiancee. It's amazing what some women are willing to marry.

What's so hard to believe? We already know the guy has a gigantic set of balls! He's probably got the rest of the tackle to go with it! :rolleyes:

Posted

Judge: Next charge is getting owned by a security guard..how do you plea?

Defendent: Of all the charges sir, that is the ONE that I am guilty of. The hit was SO good that I fear that if I counter sue, he may come after me again!

:P

Posted

I mentioned this in the other thread. He is probably not saying he didn't do it, but that he was not guilty of the charges against him. I believe it public intoxication, tresspassing, and resisting arrest. He could say he was not intoxicated, that what he did was not tresspassing, and he did not resist arrest (it was a security guard, not a police officer). Not saying he won't be found guilty in the end, but his plea of not guilty does not mean he is saying "that was not me."

Resisting arrest came when he gave the tubby a weak stiff arm and three of them crashed into each other when the Kamikazee tubalard security guy from the right completely misses the drunken fool. Security personnel or not, that action probably constitutes resisting arrest.

Running onto the field is trespassing.

And public intoxication was evident by his filmed behavior if combined with obvious drinking.

And it can all be backed up in hi-definition network broadcast replays.

Surely a judge would not let him off on technicalities if they want to continue their careers.

I wish the law was that simple.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...