Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It appears the Bengals defense isn't the only thing that ranks in the bottom 3rd of the NFL! The Big surprise though to me was the Browns ranked up at #2! I will concede their site is a bit better than the Bengals, but I don't think the difference between the two is THAT large!

From Street and Smith's Sports Business Journal:

nflteamwebsiterankings17lv.jpg

nflteamwebsiterankings27fl.jpg

Posted

The fan interactivity is a closer gauge as far as the AFCN goes:

Pittsburgh- 9

Cleveland- 11

Cincinnati- 16

Baltimore- 24

Not so far apart in that aspect, but Bengals.com is good for updates and nothing more. I don't care for the set up at all !!!

WHODEY !!!

Posted

I don't think the site is all that bad. Sure, it's not flashy, it doesn't play tackling sounds when you place the cursor over a button on the menu bar. I use that site more than any other, except this one recently, for Bengals informaton. I never find myself dissatisfied with what I see, except when Hobson waits a week to post a new story. That is a rare problem, so 24th seems harsh to me. That said, I haven't really seen much of the other options and someone has to be 24th.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...