Irish Bengal Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I'd like to think Henry will produce in this offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Next_Big_Thing Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 My bet is actually a sleeper in Charlie Frye. With Dilfer there to coach him up, he's going to be good, and Dilfer is a bit long in the tooth. I expect Cleveland to start off 0-5 and then put Frye in and watch him blossum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I'd like to think that Henry will have a hard time getting on the field due to the quality of the wideouts ahead of him. So I voted for Clayton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 Got to say I think Miller will have a big year, he is in exactly the right situation in Pittsburgh particularly with Hines holding out. I was anti-Miller when it came to the Bengals drafting him but in Pitt he has found a good home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalboomer7 Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I live real close to where Charlie Frye went to high school and most people say he's pretty dumb, and was always sort of clumsy. Don't know personally the trith to that, just what I hear. I'm going with Braylon and I'm suprised with all the OSU fans on the board he isn't running away with it. I know he's a brownie, but teh guy can play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Bengal Posted August 11, 2005 Author Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I'd like to think that Henry will have a hard time getting on the field due to the quality of the wideouts ahead of him. So I voted for Clayton. I agree as far as Henry. I just hope all our rookies are successful. (Homerism)Probably Miller since the TE is a good outlet when Tiny Ben has no one to throw to down field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 My vote goes to Clayton. I doubt Henry will play often enough to compete for this distinction, Braylon will be playing with a horrible sub-Raven offense, and Heath Miller isn't likely to be a huge producer as a rookie tight end. Clayton reminds me a lot of Peter Warrick, but in that offense, I think he could thrive early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyBengal Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 No QB in Cleveland this year = not much from BraylonWho knows about Clayton... Last chance for BollerHenry will be good, but not the BESTI look for Miller to have a good year, assuming he's healthy and the holdouts continue. Even if Ward is there, there's not much else. Miller should be the best of the group based upon his teams needs.WHODEY !!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckj414 Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I say Clayton. After the way his stint as New York's head coach ended, it seems everyone has forgotten what a great OC Jim Fassell is. I think Boller will make it to average under Fassell's tuteledge, which will give Clayton more touches than anyone on that list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengalindian Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 I'm hoping it is Braylon Edwards, because if it is Clayton, then that means the offense is somewhat clicking in Baltimore, and that only means worse for the Bengals. Also, Heath Miller is a big sleeper this year, just like Roethlisberger, so he may take it in the whole AFC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 With the exit of Plax in Pitt, Fred Gibson, the Bulldog WR could get in the mix. Considering the QB's at CLE and BAL, I don't expect much from Edwards and Clayton. Could have a Lee Evans type year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redsbengalsbucks Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 Have to go with Braylon he is there only big threat at WR's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who? Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 Of course I'm going to say Braylon, Dilfer isn't looking as bad as you all think, it all depends on if our line can gel together this season. Heath Miller would be my 2nd choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DesperateDerelict Posted August 12, 2005 Report Share Posted August 12, 2005 None of the above . . . it is VERY rare when a receiver has a stellar 1st year, and most of your choices have missed at least some training camp due to injuries or holdout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.