Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Got to say I think Miller will have a big year, he is in exactly the right situation in Pittsburgh particularly with Hines holding out. I was anti-Miller when it came to the Bengals drafting him but in Pitt he has found a good home.

Posted

I live real close to where Charlie Frye went to high school and most people say he's pretty dumb, and was always sort of clumsy. Don't know personally the trith to that, just what I hear. I'm going with Braylon and I'm suprised with all the OSU fans on the board he isn't running away with it. I know he's a brownie, but teh guy can play.

Posted
I'd like to think that Henry will have a hard time getting on the field due to the quality of the wideouts ahead of him. So I voted for Clayton.

I agree as far as Henry. I just hope all our rookies are successful. (Homerism)

Probably Miller since the TE is a good outlet when Tiny Ben has no one to throw to down field.

Posted

My vote goes to Clayton. I doubt Henry will play often enough to compete for this distinction, Braylon will be playing with a horrible sub-Raven offense, and Heath Miller isn't likely to be a huge producer as a rookie tight end. Clayton reminds me a lot of Peter Warrick, but in that offense, I think he could thrive early.

Posted

No QB in Cleveland this year = not much from Braylon

Who knows about Clayton... Last chance for Boller

Henry will be good, but not the BEST

I look for Miller to have a good year, assuming he's healthy and the holdouts continue. Even if Ward is there, there's not much else. Miller should be the best of the group based upon his teams needs.

WHODEY !!!

Posted

I say Clayton. After the way his stint as New York's head coach ended, it seems everyone has forgotten what a great OC Jim Fassell is. I think Boller will make it to average under Fassell's tuteledge, which will give Clayton more touches than anyone on that list.

Posted

I'm hoping it is Braylon Edwards, because if it is Clayton, then that means the offense is somewhat clicking in Baltimore, and that only means worse for the Bengals. Also, Heath Miller is a big sleeper this year, just like Roethlisberger, so he may take it in the whole AFC.

Posted

With the exit of Plax in Pitt, Fred Gibson, the Bulldog WR could get in the mix. Considering the QB's at CLE and BAL, I don't expect much from Edwards and Clayton.

Could have a Lee Evans type year.

Posted

Of course I'm going to say Braylon, Dilfer isn't looking as bad as you all think, it all depends on if our line can gel together this season. Heath Miller would be my 2nd choice.

Posted

None of the above . . . it is VERY rare when a receiver has a stellar 1st year, and most of your choices have missed at least some training camp due to injuries or holdout.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...