Who can we least afford to lose?

[walshfan]

At this point in time the player would have to be Rudi Johnson..

with Perry a question mark and Watson not the durable type, our running game would suffer..

[schweinhart]

If it's offense, I'd have to say Levi.

Got to say there, Walsh, there's no reason to say Watson is not the durable type at RB. When he had the op to start for the Deadskins for several games, he was plenty durable...and effective. If Rudi goes out, I'd be all right w/ Watson coming in as an all-downs back. In fact, I'm not sure the overall offense wouldn't be improved with Watson in instead of Rudi because of Watson's ability to catch and run.

[CBin2k7]

If it's offense your talking, I think it would most definetly come on the o-line. Either Willie or Rich Braham.

[DesperateDerelict]

As far as I'm concerned, there's only one irreplaceable guy . . . . MARVIN LEWIS!

[Spain]

On defense I would go J Smith just because his backup Clemmons sucks.

[cHaD711Johnson]

Clemons has produced more than Justin Smith the past few years

[membengal]

Clemons has produced more than Justin Smith the past few years

Completely and irrefutably incorrect.

[walshfan]

If it's offense, I'd have to say Levi.

Got to say there, Walsh, there's no reason to say Watson is not the durable type at RB. When he had the op to start for the Deadskins for several games, he was plenty durable...and effective. If Rudi goes out, I'd be all right w/ Watson coming in as an all-downs back. In fact, I'm not sure the overall offense wouldn't be improved with Watson in instead of Rudi because of Watson's ability to catch and run.

good point my man....Watson does bring allot to the table in terms of running and his pass catching abilities...