Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If he's capable the Bears would have retained him rather than released him (???????????)

Posted

If he's capable the Bears would have retained him rather than released him (???????????)

Well part of his release is due to his new attitude that he wanted to be traded. I think it is money related. It almost always is.

Posted

If he's capable the Bears would have retained him rather than released him (???????????)

I think it is money related. It almost always is.

And the Bengals have cap space to spare

Posted

No thanks. Makes no sense. He's not that great and even if you bring in the fact of Zimmer, he's got no role here and he's not THE answer at safety so we might as well stay with our starters and develop the young kids to see what we have

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...