Jump to content

Trade with Miami?


BoilerBengal

Recommended Posts

Just wondering what you guys thought about trading Rudi Johnson to Miami for something worthwhile since Miami is in desperate need of a RB after the retirement of Ricky Williams. I mean we dont just draft a first round RB to be a backup and third down back, and Rudi's contract is up this year. I think it'd be a great idea to pick up an extra first round pick and possibly a defensive player from Miami. The Dolphins will probably give up alot since they are so desperate. I think Marvin should look into it. Just a thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wondering what you guys thought about trading Rudi Johnson to Miami for something worthwhile since Miami is in desperate need of a RB after the retirement of Ricky Williams. I mean we dont just draft a first round RB to be a backup and third down back, and Rudi's contract is up this year. I think it'd be a great idea to pick up an extra first round pick and possibly a defensive player from Miami. The Dolphins will probably give up alot since they are so desperate. I think Marvin should look into it. Just a thought...

First off, welcome to the 'Zone Boiler.

I'm not comfortable with the thought of giving up Rudi, and I don't think Marvin would be either. Now any other backs besides Johnson or Perry, and I might be interested, as long as the Bengals pick up an IMPACT player.

Basically...if we can get a steal from Miami, (which I really doubt) DO IT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

now maybe we could trade perry... that could be something to think about. but i dont see any trades happening.

Nobody trades their 1st round draft pick without giving them a try, aside from the Chargers/Giants deal on draft day, but the reason there is more than obvious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I don't see a trade with Miami coming. Ogunleye would be an amazing pick up for the Bengals, but we need Johnson this year at least. The way Shula went off on the last thread that mentioned Rudi leaving I'm surprised I haven't seen a response here yet. Good luck!! :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

now maybe we could trade perry... that could be something to think about. but i dont see any trades happening.

Nobody trades their 1st round draft pick without giving them a try, aside from the Chargers/Giants deal on draft day, but the reason there is more than obvious!

all im saying is i would trade perry before rudi but id rather keep them both but as of right now im more of a rudi fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they'll make a trade for Skip Hicks...We don't need him and Miami needs a back, bad. Something like a conditional 4th rounder....nothing fancy, but let's be honest here folks. Miami is in serious need of running back help. their whole offense revolves around the running game.

Of course, they wouldn't be in this mess if they knew how to draft and stopped trading their picks away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hicks may be a possibility, the Dolphins only option now is Travis Minor so Hicks could be very attractive after his season in Europe. The players that were mentioned were Trung Candidate and James Stewart, but both were said not to be in the Dolphins sites. As far as trades, they figured Buffalo had the talent to deal, but that they didn't see a division rival handing over a RB. That left the Raiders with Hambrick, Zereoue, Wheatly, and Fargas as possible trading partners. If that doesn't work out I don't see why the Dolphins wouldn't look into geting Hicks or maybe Watson. It would probably get them just as good a RB as the trade with the Raiders, but since the Raiders RBs are higher profile, and they'd have to deal with Al Davis it would cost them more than dealing with Mikey and Co.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only real options are trading Watson or Hicks.

1. Hicks is a big back around 230 which would suit Wannstedts' plans in Miami for power running .

2. Watson had some decent stats in washington a couple of seasons ago, and skill wise he should be comparable to anything they have on their Roster.

As for Rudi' or Perry - nah, Ain't gonna happen, now if Ogunleye was tossed into the trade mix, it would be awful temptin'... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only real options are trading Watson or Hicks.

1. Hicks is a big back around 230 which would suit Wannstedts' plans in Miami for power running .

2. Watson had some decent stats in washington a couple of seasons ago, and skill wise he should be comparable to anything they have on their Roster.

As for Rudi' or Perry - nah, Ain't gonna happen, now if Ogunleye was tossed into the trade mix, it would be awful temptin'... :rolleyes:

Who dey! :player:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I don't see trading Rudi or Perry as an option, I think we are looking like a team with such an outstanding O-line that we could put anyone behind it and expect 1200 yards easy. If that Ogund whats his name guy were in the mix, I would jump through hoops in excitment, however, he is demanding BIG dollars. Could we work that kind of a contract ?? I don't know, just food for thought. I still don't see it happening.

WHODEY !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wondering what you guys thought about trading Rudi Johnson to Miami for something worthwhile since Miami is in desperate need of a RB after the retirement of Ricky Williams. I mean we dont just draft a first round RB to be a backup and third down back, and Rudi's contract is up this year. I think it'd be a great idea to pick up an extra first round pick and possibly a defensive player from Miami. The Dolphins will probably give up alot since they are so desperate. I think Marvin should look into it. Just a thought...

Some of you posters here are crazy!!!

I'm definitely not comfortable with giving Rudi to Miami and relying on a "could be" (Perry) and a "NFL Europe Hero" (Hicks).

I'm saying NO, NAH, NO, NO, NO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Miami is really interested, which I don't think they are, and if they offer a first rounder (which I don't think they will) or a 2-3 starters on defense, then you have pull the trigger. It will only help the team later down the road and obviously if every trusts Marvin on Palmer, then you have to trust him on Chris Perry.

BUT, I think Ricky Williams will be back with Miami before the first game of the season. Seriously, Williams is not right in the head. He'll come around....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Miami is really interested, which I don't think they are, and if they offer a first rounder (which I don't think they will) or a 2-3 starters on defense, then you have pull the trigger. It will only help the team later down the road and obviously if every trusts Marvin on Palmer, then you have to trust him on Chris Perry.

BUT, I think Ricky Williams will be back with Miami before the first game of the season. Seriously, Williams is not right in the head. He'll come around....

Ricky chose to smoke more pot instead of playing football. He won't be back.

As for "trading" for Hicks, why on earth would they do that? By the end of the preseason, we will cut Goodman, Hicks, and/or Watson. There is no question about that. We aren't the only ones who will cut a good running back either. The Raiders have a huge stable of running backs, and will likely cut one by the time the season starts.

Miami will either pounce on a cut, or make a trade with the Eagles for Westbrook or Buckhalter LONG before they come our way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miami will most likely wait for the cuts, I think the Eagles would be asking too much for either Westbrook or Buckhalter for them to pursue a trade. The Bengals may cut Goodman, probably will, but not Hicks and Watson. They will want to keep some RBs for depth and special teams, maybe even sign one of them to the practice squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean we dont just draft a first round RB to be a backup and third down back,

And you don't pick a QB No.1 to have him sit as second or even third string either I suppose?

This year the offence will need to keep the pressure off of Palmer. With the no. 1 running game (Rudi), the no.2 running game (Perry) and the no.3 running game (Perry as a receiver) I think that gives the plenty of options for the offence and plenty of headaches for the opposition defence.

Rudi has a big contract to play for in a system that did well for him last year. The Bengals don't need to lessen their armoury at all.

It aint gonna happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...