kingwilly Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 2001 r1 WR'sBusts:David Terrrell - #8Koren Robinson - #9Rod Gardner - #15Freddie Mitchel - #25Boons:Santana Moss - #16Reggie Wayne - #302002 r1 WR'sBusts:Ashley Lelie #19Boons:Done Stallworth #13Javon Walker #202003 r1 WR'sBusts:Charles Rogers #2Boons:Andre Johnson #3Bryant Johnson #172004 r1 WR'sBusts:Roy Williams #7Michael Clayton #15Michael Jenkins #29Rashaun WoodsBoons:Larry Fitzgerald #3Lee Evans #132005 r1 WR'sBusts:Troy Williamson #7Mike Williams #10Matt Jones #21Mark Clayton #22Boons:Braylon Edwards #3Roddy White #272006 r1 WR'sBusts:Boons:Santonio Holmes #252007 r1 WR'sBusts:Ted Ginn Jr. #9Craig Davis #30Boons:Calvin Johnson #2Dwayne Bowe #23Robert Meachum #27Anthony Gonzalez #322008 r1 WR'sNONE TAKEN in r12009 r1 WR's - a bit early but here is my opinion.Busts:Darius Heyward-Bey #7Boons:Michael Crabtree #10Jeremy Macklin #19Percy Harvin #22Hakem Nicks #29Kenny Britt #30TOTALS:Busts: 17Boons: 20Some of these guys are a mixed bag, like Javon Walker, or simply too early to tell. Quote
icehole3 Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 I think something that the boons have in common is they all scored a lot of TDs in college/>http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/player/_/stat/receiving/sort/receivingTouchdowns/year/2004 Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 1, 2010 Report Posted March 1, 2010 2008 r1 WR'sNONE TAKEN This. Because outside of Dez Bryant this years WR class, as currently ranked, is as weak as 2008. Furthermore, that years WR class, as ranked prior to the draft, flipped on it's head when the actual picks were made. Quote
kingwilly Posted March 2, 2010 Author Report Posted March 2, 2010 2008 r1 WR'sNONE TAKEN This. Because outside of Dez Bryant this years WR class, as currently ranked, is as weak as 2008. Furthermore, that years WR class, as ranked prior to the draft, flipped on it's head when the actual picks were made.agree. in 08, none were truly worth an r1 pick. Perhaps DeSean Jackson or Manningham have performed AHEAD of where they we taken.NADS. Quote
kingwilly Posted March 2, 2010 Author Report Posted March 2, 2010 don't u mean boom or bust?no. I don't mean boom. I mean boon.look, I am not an azzhole but instead of posting why not just look it up? it is pretty easy. Quote
COB Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Boons:Done Stallworth #13Funny error there. Quote
kingwilly Posted March 2, 2010 Author Report Posted March 2, 2010 Boons:Done Stallworth #13Funny error there.yep. and sad. Quote
walzav29 Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Boon by definition works, BUT usually its boom or bust. />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boom_and_bust Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 I actually understood the boon thing from the start. However, when you say bust...don't you mean boobs? Quote
kingwilly Posted March 2, 2010 Author Report Posted March 2, 2010 I actually understood the boon thing from the start. However, when you say bust...don't you mean boobs?In this case "moobs" ...which could also mean we can use the terms "musts" and "moons". Quote
Trevor Posted March 2, 2010 Report Posted March 2, 2010 Koren robinson was a bbeast.... too bad he was an idiot.... Now david terrel was just aweful lol im so glad we got chad Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.