gregstephens Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-7774-Cincinnati-Bengals-Examiner~y2009m9d6-Bengals-set-practice-squad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 You made a penny off me, make sure you send me my half of that asap :-)In the following sentence"Corey Lynch was a surprise cut to many, being a safety whose coverage ability, when good, is great."Did you mean 'when healthy'?My biggest issue with Lynch is his lack of foot speed, and I would say due to the number of other safeties on the roster his cut was not one that suprised me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingwilly Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 I've not no problem with them adding Shirley to the PS. Seeing him pancake that 300+lb Rams DT, like a grown man shoving down a teenager, is exactly the type of ability he brings. Get his technique down, discipline the crap out of the guy and turn him loose at G. If he does take this approach and get professional, he could be a ridiculously good G in this league. Dominant.If he stays aloof and tries just hard enough to not get cut, they should just cut him and use a spot for a guy who wil make the effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregstephens Posted September 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You made a penny off me, make sure you send me my half of that asap :-)I have made a donation in your name to the 'Earth Foundation', ala George Costanza.And I agree with your points on Lynch. I was trying to bang the article asap, so it was an abridged version without the depth I probably could have expounded on.Thanks for the click, btw. Due to the new formulation, your click netted me 83/100 of a cent, as opposed to the former one cent, so your check for 42/100 cents will be forthcoming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 ok, but I still don't understand the "when good" part.....but no matter, I need to figure out what to do next with my 42/100th of a cent. I could pair it wiht my 1 cent dividend check from Fifth Third and really splurge, I suppose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ickey44 Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 "Corey Lynch was a surprise cut to many, being a safety whose coverage ability, when good, is great."So his coverage is good and great at the same time? That doesn't make any sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregstephens Posted September 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 "Corey Lynch was a surprise cut to many, being a safety whose coverage ability, when good, is great."So his coverage is good and great at the same time? That doesn't make any sense.No, what I meant was when he was on, he was really on. When he was off, he was really off. That was always my impression of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You may want to say it a little differently, then......no offense intended Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregstephens Posted September 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You may want to say it a little differently, then......no offense intendedNone taken. It was worded a little awkwardly. Will go in and fix it. Thanks for the input. It really does help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You made a penny off me, make sure you send me my half of that asap :-)I have made a donation in your name to the 'Earth Foundation', ala George Costanza.And I agree with your points on Lynch. I was trying to bang the article asap, so it was an abridged version without the depth I probably could have expounded on.Thanks for the click, btw. Due to the new formulation, your click netted me 83/100 of a cent, as opposed to the former one cent, so your check for 42/100 cents will be forthcoming.Do you mean "the human fund?" You have to be accurate when quoting George:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregstephens Posted September 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 You made a penny off me, make sure you send me my half of that asap :-)I have made a donation in your name to the 'Earth Foundation', ala George Costanza.And I agree with your points on Lynch. I was trying to bang the article asap, so it was an abridged version without the depth I probably could have expounded on.Thanks for the click, btw. Due to the new formulation, your click netted me 83/100 of a cent, as opposed to the former one cent, so your check for 42/100 cents will be forthcoming.Do you mean "the human fund?" You have to be accurate when quoting George:)THAT'S what it was! Been a long time since I've seen that episode, but man that was a great show.Much obliged."I hereby make a donation of 44/100 cent to the human fund in the name of TJ Jackson." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 According to the wife, you may be slightly overestimating my value Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.