HairOnFire Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 so you would like either orakpo or raji at #6? Perhaps like isn't the word I'd use to describe my feelings about drafting Orakpo or Raji at #6. I simply don't see better options.and if so are you conceding that the big contracts given to the two "pass rush specialists" was mis-spent? Not at all. In fact, I think it's obvious the Bengals haven't done enough yet, and should continue adding Pass rushing talent whenever possible. To be fair, that doesn't mean the #6 pick has to be used in this manner. Only that it shouldn't be ruled out simply because Odom and Geathers are already under contract. either way i see your argument about depth. if put under the gun i most assuredly take raji over orakpo, and the way this seems to be playing out the bengals may not have a choice. They'll always have a choice, but yeah....it's beginning to feel like the draft isn't going to fall in the way many Bengals wanted. As it stands right now the 3rd ranked OT on the board, regardless of which player it turns out to be, is either going to be poor value or a very questionable pick due to character concerns. So do the Bengals force the issue or do they let the draft come to them by taking the BPA at #6? Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 It is going to be the BPA at 6. And that prob. will be Crabtree... Quote
Thurmanation Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 It is going to be the BPA at 6. And that prob. will be Crabtree...Crabtree reminds me of Simpson. They even look alike..lolAlso i would LOVE to have a cheap JThornton playing end. He was a monster coming off the edge a couple games last year. Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 The difference between Crabtree and Simpson is clear...Crabtree can play, Simpson cannot(1 catch for 1 yard in '08) Quote
Kazkal Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 Crabtree 0 catches 0 yards... simpson was injured most of last season and for all we know if we take crabtree he could have career ending injury day after we draft him. Quote
TJJackson Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 Cra-Cra-Cra-Crabtree! Cra-Cra-Cra-Cra-Crabtree!*laff* Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 Cra-Cra-Cra-Crabtree! Cra-Cra-Cra-Cra-Crabtree!*laff*Channing Crowder, Miami Dolphins.David Pollack-retiredOdell Thurman- rotting away somewhereand Reggie Myles- bagging groceries, wishing he knew how to play cornerback. Quote
TJJackson Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 It's ok, really....we would never expect someone like you to understand that every player's career eventually comes to an endBy your same "logic" (I lack a more appropriate term to describe your addled thought processes), you should be making of every once-great player who is now doing something less grand and/or exciting.But we all understand you've just decide to attack me today, and the my choice of avatar (not anyone else's) is one of your poorly conceived lines of attack. Enjoy. Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 Hey all I am saying is I was right about Channing Crowder and you were 100% wrong. You thought you were hot s**t making up names for me and Crowder, but who is laughing not, retard. Quote
TJJackson Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 We all laughed (and continue to laugh and point) because you had him as a early 1st round pickGo look up your history Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 And you completely kept attacking me for it, saying how f**king retarded it was and how bad of a player he was because he ran a 4.7 40.Looks i was ri-ri-ri-ri-right Quote
TJJackson Posted March 14, 2009 Report Posted March 14, 2009 And you completely kept attacking me for it, saying how f**king retarded it was and how bad of a player he was because he ran a 4.7 40.Looks i was ri-ri-ri-ri-rightNo, not at allYou're mistaking what we were (and still are) laughing aboutAgain, it was about you declaring as an absolute certainty that he'd be drafted in the first round....and not only that, you were fixated on the player to the point that no others could be consideredFact is, you're similarly fixated again......and the fact that you had to have this explained to you makes it all the funnier.....one might say 40 times funnier Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 And you completely kept attacking me for it, saying how f**king retarded it was and how bad of a player he was because he ran a 4.7 40.Looks i was ri-ri-ri-ri-rightNo, not at allYou're mistaking what we were (and still are) laughing aboutAgain, it was about you declaring as an absolute certainty that he'd be drafted in the first round....and not only that, you were fixated on the player to the point that no others could be consideredFact is, you're similarly fixated again......and the fact that you had to have this explained to you makes it all the funnier.....one might say 40 times funnierI am not fixated on Crabtree at all, I am just saying that your papa Mikey bear is fixated on him. With a shot to get the #1 overall prospect in the draft, I would think he would have his hands all over that. I would rather have Raji, or Maualuga(not at 6) than Crabtree, I am just saying don't be suprised if he gets selected. This shouldn't be a suprise to you TJ, I mean how long have you been a fan? Quote
ArmyBengal Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 I had you fixated on Crabtree as well, but with your 2nd to last sentence, I get where you are coming from on this. Quote
Bearcat1975 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 That Crabtree pick does have Mike Brown written all over it. Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 You can't call me crazy on this because you all know excatly what Papa Bear is thinking Quote
TJJackson Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 That Crabtree pick does have Mike Brown written all over it.Agreed. As in "only an idiot would want this guy at 6 for the Bengals".Of course, Mike Brown is only one idiot of many Quote
Whur CHad At? Posted March 15, 2009 Report Posted March 15, 2009 That Crabtree pick does have Mike Brown written all over it.Agreed. As in "only an idiot would want this guy at 6 for the Bengals".Of course, Mike Brown is only one idiot of manyAgreed. Quote
HairOnFire Posted March 16, 2009 Report Posted March 16, 2009 Crabtree reminds me of Simpson. They even look alike..lol I admit it's a dated reference, but Crabtree looks exactly like........Andre 2000. Pun intended. Quote
HAPPYJAQ Posted March 16, 2009 Report Posted March 16, 2009 How many Bengals receivers does it take to catch 92 passes?Maybe we're going to a Run and Shoot offense. Quote
Clackwoods Posted March 17, 2009 Report Posted March 17, 2009 yes but can we afford to spend draft picks on adding depth to our D when our OL can't keep our QB in one piece?Spend a second on a Center and a third on OT depth. Draft either Raji, Orakpo, Curry, or Rey with the sixth pick and call it a day. We will protect Carson and then we can use the back half of our draft for depth at other positions. If we did that I would be very happy! Quote
Clackwoods Posted March 17, 2009 Report Posted March 17, 2009 It is going to be the BPA at 6. And that prob. will be Crabtree...Crabtree reminds me of Simpson. They even look alike..lolAlso i would LOVE to have a cheap JThornton playing end. He was a monster coming off the edge a couple games last year.How does a small school WR remind you of one of the most prolific college WR's ever? lmao I wouldn't mind taking Crabtree and trading Chad for a first and drafting Rey Rey! Quote
Clackwoods Posted March 17, 2009 Report Posted March 17, 2009 And you completely kept attacking me for it, saying how f**king retarded it was and how bad of a player he was because he ran a 4.7 40.Looks i was ri-ri-ri-ri-rightNo, not at allYou're mistaking what we were (and still are) laughing aboutAgain, it was about you declaring as an absolute certainty that he'd be drafted in the first round....and not only that, you were fixated on the player to the point that no others could be consideredFact is, you're similarly fixated again......and the fact that you had to have this explained to you makes it all the funnier.....one might say 40 times funnierI am not fixated on Crabtree at all, I am just saying that your papa Mikey bear is fixated on him. With a shot to get the #1 overall prospect in the draft, I would think he would have his hands all over that. I would rather have Raji, or Maualuga(not at 6) than Crabtree, I am just saying don't be suprised if he gets selected. This shouldn't be a suprise to you TJ, I mean how long have you been a fan?Chad I am with you on this, but I am fixated on Crabtree and I don't care what anyone has to say about it.....He would be here the rest of Carson's career and now with Coles here we could do what Detroit did with Calvin Johnson. He could be the number 2 receiver and ease in until he is ready to dominate in year 2. How many people in here would rather have Calvin Johnson than Leon Hall? I would much rather have Calvin and be talking about drafting a CB to start in round 2.Fast forward 2 years from now and think, who would you rather have a Calvin Johnson talent at WR and still looking for a pass rusher (That may or may not pan out if picked this year) or a PassRusher that will improve our defense, but then we are stuck with a 33 year old Coles and a 32 year old Chad Johnson and a young Caldwell and a bust in Simpson. Then we are talking about taking a number one receiver at around 15-25 which presents a much greater bust rate.Hopefully you can see my logic! Quote
cincyhokie Posted March 17, 2009 Report Posted March 17, 2009 And you completely kept attacking me for it, saying how f**king retarded it was and how bad of a player he was because he ran a 4.7 40.Looks i was ri-ri-ri-ri-rightNo, not at allYou're mistaking what we were (and still are) laughing aboutAgain, it was about you declaring as an absolute certainty that he'd be drafted in the first round....and not only that, you were fixated on the player to the point that no others could be consideredFact is, you're similarly fixated again......and the fact that you had to have this explained to you makes it all the funnier.....one might say 40 times funnierI am not fixated on Crabtree at all, I am just saying that your papa Mikey bear is fixated on him. With a shot to get the #1 overall prospect in the draft, I would think he would have his hands all over that. I would rather have Raji, or Maualuga(not at 6) than Crabtree, I am just saying don't be suprised if he gets selected. This shouldn't be a suprise to you TJ, I mean how long have you been a fan?Chad I am with you on this, but I am fixated on Crabtree and I don't care what anyone has to say about it.....He would be here the rest of Carson's career and now with Coles here we could do what Detroit did with Calvin Johnson. He could be the number 2 receiver and ease in until he is ready to dominate in year 2. How many people in here would rather have Calvin Johnson than Leon Hall? I would much rather have Calvin and be talking about drafting a CB to start in round 2.Fast forward 2 years from now and think, who would you rather have a Calvin Johnson talent at WR and still looking for a pass rusher (That may or may not pan out if picked this year) or a PassRusher that will improve our defense, but then we are stuck with a 33 year old Coles and a 32 year old Chad Johnson and a young Caldwell and a bust in Simpson. Then we are talking about taking a number one receiver at around 15-25 which presents a much greater bust rate.Hopefully you can see my logic!I love how everyone is so quick to label Simpson as a bust. The man was drafted LAST year! Chad Johnson was drafted in 2001...where was his production the first 2 years????? Relax people, give the man a shot. Quote
Clackwoods Posted March 17, 2009 Report Posted March 17, 2009 And you completely kept attacking me for it, saying how f**king retarded it was and how bad of a player he was because he ran a 4.7 40.Looks i was ri-ri-ri-ri-rightNo, not at allYou're mistaking what we were (and still are) laughing aboutAgain, it was about you declaring as an absolute certainty that he'd be drafted in the first round....and not only that, you were fixated on the player to the point that no others could be consideredFact is, you're similarly fixated again......and the fact that you had to have this explained to you makes it all the funnier.....one might say 40 times funnierI am not fixated on Crabtree at all, I am just saying that your papa Mikey bear is fixated on him. With a shot to get the #1 overall prospect in the draft, I would think he would have his hands all over that. I would rather have Raji, or Maualuga(not at 6) than Crabtree, I am just saying don't be suprised if he gets selected. This shouldn't be a suprise to you TJ, I mean how long have you been a fan?Chad I am with you on this, but I am fixated on Crabtree and I don't care what anyone has to say about it.....He would be here the rest of Carson's career and now with Coles here we could do what Detroit did with Calvin Johnson. He could be the number 2 receiver and ease in until he is ready to dominate in year 2. How many people in here would rather have Calvin Johnson than Leon Hall? I would much rather have Calvin and be talking about drafting a CB to start in round 2.Fast forward 2 years from now and think, who would you rather have a Calvin Johnson talent at WR and still looking for a pass rusher (That may or may not pan out if picked this year) or a PassRusher that will improve our defense, but then we are stuck with a 33 year old Coles and a 32 year old Chad Johnson and a young Caldwell and a bust in Simpson. Then we are talking about taking a number one receiver at around 15-25 which presents a much greater bust rate.Hopefully you can see my logic!I love how everyone is so quick to label Simpson as a bust. The man was drafted LAST year! Chad Johnson was drafted in 2001...where was his production the first 2 years????? Relax people, give the man a shot.That was a hypothetical situation based on his production last season. I understand that not all small school receivers are like Jerry Rice. It takes time for them to develop, but I don't think we can justify passing on Crabtree just because we have Simpson! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.