HoosierCat Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 http://www.bengals.com/news/news.asp?story_id=6770Mildly surprised they let Schlegal go, he was a decent backup, but rumor last January was that he was in for back surgery, so that may have something to do with it. Quote
ChadJohnson-85 Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 I bet they wish they didn't cut them now that Retard Brooks is going to be suspended for the next two years... Quote
Pidge Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 Is Highsmith still unsigned? A slow backer is better than no backer. Quote
ChadJohnson-85 Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 Is Highsmith still unsigned? A slow backer is better than no backer.I'd like to see Ali in stripes. Quote
Pidge Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 Is Highsmith still unsigned? A slow backer is better than no backer.I'd like to see Ali in stripes.Me too. His 40 time puts people off but he made plenty of plays in college. I think he's quick enough to make a difference at least. Quote
HAPPYJAQ Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 Is Highsmith still unsigned? A slow backer is better than no backer.I'd like to see Ali in stripes.Me too. His 40 time puts people off but he made plenty of plays in college. I think he's quick enough to make a difference at least.Highsmith signed with Arizona. After the Brooks incident, Schlegal might be on speed dial, though. Quote
Pidge Posted May 1, 2008 Report Posted May 1, 2008 Is Highsmith still unsigned? A slow backer is better than no backer.I'd like to see Ali in stripes.Me too. His 40 time puts people off but he made plenty of plays in college. I think he's quick enough to make a difference at least.Highsmith signed with Arizona. After the Brooks incident, Schlegal might be on speed dial, though.Well, that's that then. Anthony, you're back in business. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.