walzav29 Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 Chad is doing exactly the same thing that Carl Pickens did. It's the Carl Pickens Clause for Christs sake. http://www.sportslawnews.com/archive/Artic...ycllausearb.htmSomeone clue me in on what I'm missing. Did he not sign it? Are they not using it so they can calm him down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 The clause was nullified when they redid the CBA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidge Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 It was removed from the last CBA I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 The most they can do is suspend him 4 games for conduct detrimental to the team. He wouldn't get paid for those games and they could reclaim 4/17 of his annual bonus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJJackson Posted April 30, 2008 Report Share Posted April 30, 2008 The "would not get paid" part - yesThe "reclaim his bonus" part - maybe in terms of cap dollars, but I very much doubt he is required to write them a check Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.