Jump to content

PFT on the Chad "problem"


Bengals1

Recommended Posts

January 31, 2008, 3:31 p.m.

Several readers have asked whether the ongoing antics of Chad Johnson, featuring a radio row effort to get himself traded without coming out and demanding a trade, runs afoul of the Bengals’ notorious “loyalty clause,” also known as the “Carl Pickens clause.”

The easy answer is no, but only because the Pickens clause was rendered null and void by the 2006 revisions to the Collective Bargaining Agreement. The amendment specifically prohibits an attack on a signing bonus based on adverse public statements. Thus, the bonus money Johnson received as part of his April 2006 contract extension is safe.

However, the CBA does not prevent the imposition of discipline for conduct detrimental to the team. And how can it not be detrimental for a player who is under contract to attempt, city by city, to generate buzz for a possible trade?

Whether the Bengals try to impose discipline on Johnson for his antics remains to be seen. But given the lengths to which team president Mike Brown went to justify the loyalty clause, including but not limited to writing a column for the Cincinnati Enquirer, it’s clear that the Bengals understand the connection between a player “blurting off at the mouth” (thanks, Emmitt) and team performance.

As Brown wrote more than seven years ago: “For as long as team sports have been played, it has been demonstrated that teams that bond well perform well on the field. Players who openly criticize their teammates and coaches undermine the team’s ability to win games.”

So while the team’s options are limited, discipline can be imposed. And a league source with knowledge of the dynamics of the Bengals front office predicts that the current situation could eventually result in a T.O.-style feud.

“Mike Brown won’t trade him under any circumstances,” the source said. “They will let him sit and rot.”

Stay tuned, folks. Once Ocho Stinko watches someone hoisting the Lombardi on Sunday night, the desire to get his own fingerprints on it will only increase. And his campaign to land with a team that he regards as a contender will continue to intensify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But given the lengths to which team president Mike Brown went to justify the loyalty clause, including but not limited to writing a column for the Cincinnati Enquirer, it’s clear that the Bengals understand the connection between a player “blurting off at the mouth” (thanks, Emmitt) and team performance.

:lmao: Oh, puhhh-leeeze! The clause didn't have a thing to do with the Bengals understanding any connection. It had to do with Mike Brown ensuring that he could recoup bonus money if a player went thermonuclear on the organization and forced his way off the team (see Pickens, Carl). And no, Chad hasn't gotten anywhere near Pickens' or even Dillon's level yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The clause didn't have a thing to do with the Bengals understanding any connection. It had to do with Mike Brown ensuring that he could recoup bonus money if a player went thermonuclear on the organization and forced his way off the team (see Pickens, Carl). And no, Chad hasn't gotten anywhere near Pickens' or even Dillon's level yet.

The operative word here being "yet". ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporter interviewed NFC GM that said Chad will get traded and that the Bengals will get a first round pick for him....

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

I kinda thought it was funny too...but she followed it up with, "A team paid a first round pick for Deion Branch...and Chad is WAY better than Deion Branch..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And no, Chad hasn't gotten anywhere near Pickens' or even Dillon's level yet.

He's getting close to Dillon territory, isn't he?

Chad's using his words carefully, not naming names, playing the victim, not trashing the franchise as a whole etc..., so yeah he's close, but just handling it differently.

That this keeps happening every few years to star players here, is a perfect example of how little things have changed.

Head cases like Chad just can't handle the difficulty in playing here. Again, you play here to earn a check, not to win or go to the post season.

I wish these guys would get that straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can just combine this with my thoughts on the Kelley Washington topic as well.

It's all mentality. Chad is pissed because no one came out and said we love Chad in the organization and he's pissed because he thinks TJ is gonna get more money. He has one of the top 5 QB's in the league and he's lobbying for the 1-15 Miami Dolphins to call him up. <_<

Listen how Kwash talks about how different the mentallity is @ NE, about how it's about selflessness and team and winning. And he didn't have that here, either. He was always whining about PT and if I remember correctly(which I may not) wasn't too enthusiastic about playing ST while in Cincy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...