icehole3 Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://www.1530homer.com/pages/lancesBlog.htmlIf you go there and listen to Lap's comments, it sounds like Cleveland couldnt block Ahmad Brooks and when he left they licked their chops seeing ole number 58 coming into the game. If Caleb is in there against Seattle Im predicting a Seattle win. Listening to Lapham it sounds like the reason guys were getting out of their gaps was because Caleb Miller was getting popped out of the defense like a cork and guys started sliding towards him, if thats the case he must be cut when guys come back from injuries, Im sorry he has to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjakq27 Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://www.1530homer.com/pages/lancesBlog.htmlIf you go there and listen to Lap's comments, it sounds like Cleveland couldnt block Ahmad Brooks and when he left they licked their chops seeing ole number 58 coming into the game. If Caleb is in there against Seattle Im predicting a Seattle win. Listening to Lapham it sounds like the reason guys were getting out of their gaps was because Caleb Miller was getting popped out of the defense like a cork and guys started sliding towards him, if thats the case he must be cut when guys come back from injuries, Im sorry he has to go.Using one of Lap's favorite lines, " he's got no lead in his butt." Miller is another one of those try-hard guys that this team has in abundance . I think he was drafted with special teams in mind with an occasional start or moderate playing time but it is obvious that he is not a top level, everydown backer. I look for the 'hawks to run early and often if Miller is in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HairOnFire Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://www.1530homer.com/pages/lancesBlog.htmlIf you go there and listen to Lap's comments, it sounds like Cleveland couldnt block Ahmad Brooks and when he left they licked their chops seeing ole number 58 coming into the game. I hate to throw cold water on anyones rant....(No, I don't)...but Bres is on record claiming that Brooks was injured on the 2nd defensive snap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC_Bengals_Fan Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 I hate to throw cold water on anyones rant....(No, I don't)...but Bres is on record claiming that Brooks was injured on the 2nd defensive snap.Hey, Brooks is pretty impressive. They may have been ready to pack it in based on those 2 incredible snaps by Brooks. But wait - here comes Caleb Miller! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierCat Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 I have absolutely no difficulty in believing that the browns were thrilled to see Brooks replaced with Frodo Miller. Ahmad may still be struggling to become a complete LB, but as we saw at the end of preseason and in the Balti game, if you just let him fly to the ball, he does pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlainThePain Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 Miller being in the game probably accounts for some of the runs, but he doesn't account for those bombs to Braylon Edwards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarsonCity Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Well, Caleb better step it up this week because it looks like Brooks won't be playing. From PFT...LB Ahmad Brooks (groin), C Eric Ghiaciuc (thumb), and LB Lemar Marshall (groin) are doubtful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ickey44 Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Yeah, we're screwed... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripes Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 I thought Ghiaciuc was expected to play... if he's out, that's another big hit. I doubt Step will play well two straight weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazkal Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Caleb isn't the greatest backer (just too small) but he's far from reason we let up that many points...He's had solid games and wasn't he starting in the game we shut the browns out of last year? like he said starter snaps do help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1 Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 We could have probably signed J. Trotter but Marvin didn't want him 'cause he can't play special teams anymore.Just my 2-cents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icehole3 Posted September 23, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 we're going to play some downs with 2 LBs, great only in cincy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whur CHad At? Posted September 23, 2007 Report Share Posted September 23, 2007 Caleb Miller is the worst LB in NFL History besides Brian Bosworth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.